IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/poprpr/v41y2022i4d10.1007_s11113-022-09715-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Forecasting a Tribal Population Using the Cohort-Component Method: A Case Study of the Hopi

Author

Listed:
  • David A. Swanson

    (University of California Riverside
    University of Washington
    Mississippi State University)

Abstract

Population forecasting is a difficult endeavor. When it involves a “small” population, forecasting becomes even more difficult because of the lack of adequate input data to appropriately implement a technique preferred by demographers, the cohort-component method (CCM). Small populations also are subject to high levels of stochastic uncertainty, which can lead to substantial temporal fluctuations in size as well as mortality, fertility, and migration rates over short periods of time. When the population is further defined in terms of characteristics such as tribal membership requirements, the acquisition of relevant age-sex and component data for the discrete population adds even more difficulty because the usual data sources may not have precise data for a given tribe, especially when there is a need for long-term forecasts as is the case in disputes over water allotments. In this case study of the Hopi tribal population, I show that these problems can be overcome, resulting in reasonably accurate forecasts over a long period of time. To do this, I identify three key input data sources: (1) an historic tribal census that serves as the basis for tribal membership; (2) the Social Security Administration’s life tables, which are specific to cohorts by year of birth, staring in 1900; and (3) an accurate annual record of tribal membership record that covers a time period that can be used as a benchmark once the forecast is launched from the historic tribal census. For this case study. these three data sources allow me to launch an 80 year CCM forecast of the Hopi Tribal Population from its 1937 tribal census to 2017 and conduct an ex post facto assessment of the accuracy of the forecasted total population in five-year increments from 1992 to 2017 using the annual tribal membership roll for this period; the assessment finds that the forecast matches up well with the tribal membership roll. So without adjustments, the forecast is taken out 20 years more, from 2017 to 2037. The results suggest that accurate long-term forecasts are possible using the cohort-component method for the Hopi, which, in turn, suggests that this same CCM process could be used to develop reasonably accurate long-term population forecasts of other tribes for which a tribal census was conducted that is linked to current tribal membership rolls, especially when these forecasts are required in resolving disputes over water allotments.

Suggested Citation

  • David A. Swanson, 2022. "Forecasting a Tribal Population Using the Cohort-Component Method: A Case Study of the Hopi," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(4), pages 1831-1852, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:41:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11113-022-09715-5
    DOI: 10.1007/s11113-022-09715-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-022-09715-5
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11113-022-09715-5?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Carolyn Liebler & Timothy Ortyl, 2014. "More Than One Million New American Indians in 2000: Who Are They?," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 51(3), pages 1101-1130, June.
    2. Jeffrey Passel, 1976. "Provisional evaluation of the 1970 census count of American Indians," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 13(3), pages 397-409, August.
    3. David Swanson & Alan Schlottmann & Bob Schmidt, 2010. "Forecasting the Population of Census Tracts by Age and Sex: An Example of the Hamilton–Perry Method in Action," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 29(1), pages 47-63, February.
    4. Sarah Cannon & Christine Percheski, 2017. "Fertility change in the American Indian and Alaska Native population, 1980–2010," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 37(1), pages 1-12.
    5. David A. Swanson & Jeff Tayman, 2011. "On Estimating a De Facto Population and Its Components," Review of Economics & Finance, Better Advances Press, Canada, vol. 1, pages 17-31, November.
    6. Jeff Tayman & Stanley Smith & Jeffrey Lin, 2007. "Precision, bias, and uncertainty for state population forecasts: an exploratory analysis of time series models," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 26(3), pages 347-369, June.
    7. Jacob S. Siegel, 1953. "Forecasting the Population of Small Areas," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 29(1), pages 72-88.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tom Wilson & Irina Grossman & Monica Alexander & Phil Rees & Jeromey Temple, 2022. "Methods for Small Area Population Forecasts: State-of-the-Art and Research Needs," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(3), pages 865-898, June.
    2. Patrick Broman & Tahu Kukutai, 2021. "Fixed not fluid: European identification in the Aotearoa New Zealand census," Journal of Population Research, Springer, vol. 38(2), pages 103-138, June.
    3. Carolyn A. Liebler, 2018. "Counting America’s First Peoples," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 677(1), pages 180-190, May.
    4. Jack Baker & David Swanson & Jeff Tayman, 2021. "The Accuracy of Hamilton–Perry Population Projections for Census Tracts in the United States," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 40(6), pages 1341-1354, December.
    5. Jeffrey Burnette & Weiwei Zhang, 2019. "Distributional Differences and the Native American Gender Wage Gap," Economies, MDPI, vol. 7(2), pages 1-18, May.
    6. Carolyn A. Liebler & Renuka Bhaskar & Sonya Rastogi, 2014. "Dynamics of Race: Joining, Leaving, and Staying in the American Indian/Alaska Native Race Category between 2000 and 2010," CARRA Working Papers 2014-10, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau.
    7. Carolyn A. Liebler & Sonya R. Porter & Leticia E. Fernandez & James M. Noon & Sharon R. Ennis, 2017. "America’s Churning Races: Race and Ethnicity Response Changes Between Census 2000 and the 2010 Census," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 54(1), pages 259-284, February.
    8. Peter A. Morrison & Brad Edmondson & Kristie Ferrantella & David Lockhart & Samantha Reis & Anna Tapp, 2020. "Estimating Nantucket’s Effective Population," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 39(3), pages 577-604, June.
    9. Jennifer Glick & Seung Han, 2015. "Socioeconomic Stratification from Within: Changes Within American Indian Cohorts in the United States: 1990–2010," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 34(1), pages 77-112, February.
    10. Stanley Smith & Terry Sincich, 1988. "Stability over time in the distribution of population forecast errors," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 25(3), pages 461-474, August.
    11. Tom Wilson, 2016. "Evaluation of Alternative Cohort-Component Models for Local Area Population Forecasts," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 35(2), pages 241-261, April.
    12. Jack Baker & Adelamar Alcantara & Xiaomin Ruan & Kendra Watkins & Srini Vasan, 2013. "A Comparative Evaluation of Error and Bias in Census Tract-Level Age/Sex-Specific Population Estimates: Component I (Net-Migration) vs Component III (Hamilton–Perry)," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 32(6), pages 919-942, December.
    13. Andrew Francis-Tan & Zheng Mu, 2019. "Racial Revolution: Understanding the Resurgence of Ethnic Minority Identity in Modern China," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 38(5), pages 733-769, October.
    14. Osman Gulseven, 2016. "Forecasting Population and Demographic Composition of Kuwait Until 2030," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 1429-1435.
    15. repec:rre:publsh:v:33:y:2003:i:1:p:85-103 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Guillaume Marois & Alain Bélanger, 2014. "Microsimulation Model Projecting Small Area Populations Using Contextual Variables: An Application to the Montreal Metropolitan Area, 2006-2031," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 7(1), pages 158-193.
    17. Gary Sandefur & Arthur Sakamoto, 1988. "American Indian household structure and income," Demography, Springer;Population Association of America (PAA), vol. 25(1), pages 71-80, February.
    18. Tom Wilson, 2022. "Preparing local area population forecasts using a bi-regional cohort-component model without the need for local migration data," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 46(32), pages 919-956.
    19. Jeff Tayman, 2011. "Assessing Uncertainty in Small Area Forecasts: State of the Practice and Implementation Strategy," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 30(5), pages 781-800, October.
    20. Guy Abel & Jakub Bijak & Jonathan J. Forster & James Raymer & Peter W.F. Smith & Jackie S.T. Wong, 2013. "Integrating uncertainty in time series population forecasts: An illustration using a simple projection model," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 29(43), pages 1187-1226.
    21. Vítor Miranda, 2015. "A resurgence of black identity in Brazil? Evidence from an analysis of recent censuses," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 32(59), pages 1603-1630.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:41:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11113-022-09715-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.