IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/poprpr/v34y2015i4p461-480.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Conflicts in the Use of the ACS by Federal Agencies Between Statutory Requirements and Survey Methodology

Author

Listed:
  • Katherine Nesse
  • Mallory Rahe

Abstract

The American Community Survey (ACS) has been fully implemented since 2005. The Census Bureau has released four 5-year datasets, the most geographically detailed dataset. Yet, government agencies still grapple with how to use the multiple datasets and estimates. The Census Bureau publishes guidelines for their use, emphasizing the need to balance timeliness and precision in choosing an estimate and encouraging the use of the margin of error. This study examines how three federal agencies use the ACS to implement programs to understand whether the published guidelines address the issues of importance to government agencies. These programs all use income data from the ACS, but for different ends: eligibility criteria, evaluation of federal guideline implementation, and allocation of funds among urban areas. After reviewing agency publications, studying changes in policy, and conducting personal interviews with officials, we find that the agencies consider not only precision and timeliness when choosing an estimate, but also statutory requirements, computational limitations, and geographic needs. Federal agencies are cognizant that these estimates are subject to error, but find that the margin of error adds complexity that does not necessarily result in better implementation of programs. The ACS offers users multiple dataset choices, with varying degrees of reliability, to estimate population characteristics. Current Census Bureau guidelines for the ACS do not meet the needs of many government agencies, as federal statutes are not designed with the current survey methodology in mind. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Suggested Citation

  • Katherine Nesse & Mallory Rahe, 2015. "Conflicts in the Use of the ACS by Federal Agencies Between Statutory Requirements and Survey Methodology," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 34(4), pages 461-480, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:34:y:2015:i:4:p:461-480
    DOI: 10.1007/s11113-014-9352-7
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11113-014-9352-7
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s11113-014-9352-7?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah Griffin & Preston Waite, 2006. "American Community Survey overview and the role of external evaluations," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 25(3), pages 201-223, June.
    2. Joseph Salvo & Arun Lobo, 2006. "Moving from a decennial census to a continuous measurement survey: factors affecting nonresponse at the neighborhood level," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 25(3), pages 225-241, June.
    3. Linda Gage, 2006. "Comparison of Census 2000 and American Community Survey 1999–2001 Estimates: San Francisco and Tulare Counties, California," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 25(3), pages 243-256, June.
    4. repec:mpr:mprres:7602 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Karen E. Cunnyngham, "undated". "Reaching Those in Need: State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates in 2010," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 53f19dadfd8c4b80ac3b6fd51, Mathematica Policy Research.
    6. Robert Scardamalia, 2006. "The American Community Survey: general commentary on the findings from external evaluations," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 25(3), pages 293-303, June.
    7. George Hough & David Swanson, 2006. "An evaluation of the American Community Survey: results from the Oregon test site," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 25(3), pages 257-273, June.
    8. repec:mpr:mprres:7603 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Esa Eslami, "undated". "Trends in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates: Fiscal Year 2010 to Fiscal Year 2012 (Summary)," Mathematica Policy Research Reports f44863ea1d3c4d30bac4593a6, Mathematica Policy Research.
    10. Paul Auken & Roger Hammer & Paul Voss & Daniel Veroff, 2006. "The American Community Survey in counties with “seasonal” populations," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 25(3), pages 275-292, June.
    11. Esa Eslami & Joshua Leftin & Mark Strayer, 2012. "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates: Fiscal Year 2010," Mathematica Policy Research Reports b8466bca88894ddb9414bf316, Mathematica Policy Research.
    12. repec:mpr:mprres:4507 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Prener, Chris & Braswell, Taylor & Monti, Daniel J., 2018. "St. Louis's "Urban Prairie": Vacant Land and the Potential for Revitalization," SocArXiv bc7eh, Center for Open Science.
    2. Bev Wilson & Mallory L. Rahe, 2016. "Rural prosperity and federal expenditures, 2000–2010," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 8(1-2), pages 3-26, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Esa Eslami, 2015. "State Trends in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Eligibility and Participation Among Elderly Individuals, Fiscal Year 2008 to Fiscal Year 2013," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 25a1f599ddc441789708acc44, Mathematica Policy Research.
    2. Prell, Mark & Newman, Constance & Scherpf, Erik, 2015. "Annual and Monthly SNAP Participation Rates," Economic Research Report 262206, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    3. Karen Cunnyngham & Amang Sukasih & Laura Castner, "undated". "Empirical Bayes Shrinkage Estimates of State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates in Fiscal Year 2010 to Fiscal Year 2012 for All Eligible People and the Working Poor," Mathematica Policy Research Reports c993f0e997274d9eb4d9ba7f0, Mathematica Policy Research.
    4. Karen Cunnyngham & Joel Smith, "undated". "Creation of the 2010 CPS-Based Eligibility File, SNAP QC-Based Participation Estimates, and SNAP Participation Rates," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 48a8a75e53354fe4aa6690299, Mathematica Policy Research.
    5. Esa Eslami, "undated". "Characteristics of Elderly Individuals Participating in and Eligible for SNAP (Issue Brief)," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 6305be67a4f34f559359ecc63, Mathematica Policy Research.
    6. Esa Eslami, "undated". "Trends in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates: Fiscal Year 2010 to Fiscal Year 2013," Mathematica Policy Research Reports e20d082aba7c4fa2915f3da34, Mathematica Policy Research.
    7. D. Ribar & Christopher A. Swann, 2014. "If at first you don't succeed: applying for and staying on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(27), pages 3339-3350, September.
    8. David Swanson & George Hough, 2012. "An Evaluation of Persons per Household (PPH) Estimates Generated by the American Community Survey: A Demographic Perspective," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 31(2), pages 235-266, April.
    9. Peter Ganong & Jeffrey B. Liebman, 2018. "The Decline, Rebound, and Further Rise in SNAP Enrollment: Disentangling Business Cycle Fluctuations and Policy Changes," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 10(4), pages 153-176, November.
    10. repec:mpr:mprres:8034 is not listed on IDEAS
    11. repec:mpr:mprres:7988 is not listed on IDEAS
    12. Anne Peterson & Brittany McGill & Betsy Thorn & Brian Estes & Carole Trippe & Bryan Johnson & Ellen Thompson & Errol Baker & Jonathan Ladinsky & Gretchen Rowe, "undated". "Assessing the Feasibility of Implementing SNAP in the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands," Mathematica Policy Research Reports b383658102c7435e900af4b7f, Mathematica Policy Research.
    13. Esa Eslami & Karen Cunnyngham, "undated". "Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates: Fiscal Years 2010 and 2011," Mathematica Policy Research Reports f09afead72254cffb3ad79d11, Mathematica Policy Research.
    14. Quinn Moore & Kevin Conway & Brandon Kyler & Andrew Gothro, "undated". "Direct Certification in the National School Lunch Program: State Implementation Progress, School Year 2012-2013," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 906a9b7e366f4cec88c0fd552, Mathematica Policy Research.
    15. Karen Cunnyngham, "undated". "Empirical Bayes Shrinkage Estimates of State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates in Fiscal Year 2013 to Fiscal Year 2015 for All Eligible People and Working Poor People," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ab9ee4f3a6ce4fbeb6be4427d, Mathematica Policy Research.
    16. Tatiana Homonoff & Jason Somerville, 2021. "Program Recertification Costs: Evidence from SNAP," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 13(4), pages 271-298, November.
    17. Colleen Heflin & Michah W. Rothbart & Mattie Mackenzie-Liu, 2022. "Below the Tip of the Iceberg: Examining Early Childhood Participation in SNAP and TANF from Birth to Age Six," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(2), pages 729-755, April.
    18. Nyakundi Michieka & Archana Pradhan & Tesfa Gebremedhin, 2010. "A Spatial Analysis of Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Economic Conditions in the Applachian Region," Working Papers Working Paper 2010-08, Regional Research Institute, West Virginia University.
    19. Karen Cunnyngham, "undated". "Empirical Bayes Shrinkage Estimates of State Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Participation Rates in Fiscal Year 2015 to Fiscal Year 2017 for All Eligible People and Working Poor People," Mathematica Policy Research Reports fb70d51ab56a4c958c7ef8696, Mathematica Policy Research.
    20. Leanne Giordono & David W. Rothwell & Stephanie Grutzmacher & Mark Edwards, 2022. "Understanding SNAP use patterns among older adults," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(2), pages 609-634, June.
    21. repec:mpr:mprres:7956 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. James Mabli & Emily Sama Martin & Laura Castner, "undated". "Effects of Economic Conditions and Program Policy on State Food Stamp Program Caseloads, 2000 to 2006," Mathematica Policy Research Reports ec950dbf29b04dca965ac615e, Mathematica Policy Research.
    23. Karen E. Cunnyngham & Laura A. Castner & Allen L. Schirm, "undated". "Empirical Bayes Shrinkage Estimates of State Food Stamp Program Participation Rates in 2004-2006 for All Eligible People and the Working Poor," Mathematica Policy Research Reports 9fed8b527c7b418698532a947, Mathematica Policy Research.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:34:y:2015:i:4:p:461-480. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.