IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this article

Market power, efficiency and bank profitability: evidence from Ghana

Listed author(s):
  • Abdul Alhassan

    ()

  • Michael Tetteh

    ()

  • Freeman Brobbey

    ()

Registered author(s):

    This study examines the determinants of bank profitability in Ghana within the market power, relative market power and efficient structure frameworks. Using annual data on 26 Ghanaian banks from 2003 to 2011, we employ the Herfindahl Index and concentration ratio as our proxies for market power hypothesis while efficiency scores from the data envelopment analysis is employed as a proxy for the efficient structure hypothesis. The system generalized method of moment is employed to estimate a panel data model with return on assets, return on equity and net interest margin as our proxies for bank profitability. The results of the empirical estimation reject both the market power and relative market power hypotheses in the Ghanaian banking industry. While technical efficiency is found to have a positive relationship with profitability to support the efficient structure hypothesis, a negative relationship between scale efficiency and profitability is reflected by the inability of banks to operate at the optimal scale of operations. We also document evidence on the low persistence of profit which suggests a competitive banking industry. Implications for industry regulation are discussed. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s10644-015-9174-6
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.

    Article provided by Springer in its journal Economic Change and Restructuring.

    Volume (Year): 49 (2016)
    Issue (Month): 1 (February)
    Pages: 71-93

    as
    in new window

    Handle: RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:49:y:2016:i:1:p:71-93
    DOI: 10.1007/s10644-015-9174-6
    Contact details of provider: Web page: http://www.springer.com

    Order Information: Web: http://www.springer.com/economics/development/journal/10644/PS2

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:ecopln:v:49:y:2016:i:1:p:71-93. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sonal Shukla)

    or (Rebekah McClure)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.