IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/compec/v62y2023i4d10.1007_s10614-022-10308-9.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparison of Different Rules on Loans Evaluation in Peer-to-Peer Lending by Gradient Boosting Models Under Moving Windows with Two Timestamps

Author

Listed:
  • Ligang Zhou

    (Macau University of Science and Technology)

  • Chao Ma

    (Macau University of Science and Technology)

Abstract

This study investigates different investment rules on loans in peer-to-peer lending, such as default probability (DP), credit grade from the platform, internal rate of return (IRR), net present value (NPV), and Sharpe ratio (SR). We use classical models and gradient boosting models (GBM) to evaluate loans in a practical setting by considering two timestamps associated with each observation in the data set collected from a P2P platform. The empirical study demonstrates the realistic performance of different investment rules. Furthermore, some investment decisions based on IRR, NPV, and SR can outperform those based on DP and credit grade from the platform, which may provide a P2P lending platform with an impetus for deploying decision support systems to help investors improve investment performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Ligang Zhou & Chao Ma, 2023. "A Comparison of Different Rules on Loans Evaluation in Peer-to-Peer Lending by Gradient Boosting Models Under Moving Windows with Two Timestamps," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 62(4), pages 1481-1504, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:62:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-022-10308-9
    DOI: 10.1007/s10614-022-10308-9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10614-022-10308-9
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10614-022-10308-9?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fitzpatrick, Trevor & Mues, Christophe, 2021. "How can lenders prosper? Comparing machine learning approaches to identify profitable peer-to-peer loan investments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 294(2), pages 711-722.
    2. Guo, Yanhong & Zhou, Wenjun & Luo, Chunyu & Liu, Chuanren & Xiong, Hui, 2016. "Instance-based credit risk assessment for investment decisions in P2P lending," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 249(2), pages 417-426.
    3. Xuchen Lin & Xiaolong Li & Zhong Zheng, 2017. "Evaluating borrower’s default risk in peer-to-peer lending: evidence from a lending platform in China," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 49(35), pages 3538-3545, July.
    4. Riza Emekter & Yanbin Tu & Benjamas Jirasakuldech & Min Lu, 2015. "Evaluating credit risk and loan performance in online Peer-to-Peer (P2P) lending," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(1), pages 54-70, January.
    5. Mingfeng Lin & Nagpurnanand R. Prabhala & Siva Viswanathan, 2013. "Judging Borrowers by the Company They Keep: Friendship Networks and Information Asymmetry in Online Peer-to-Peer Lending," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 59(1), pages 17-35, August.
    6. Yufei Xia & Lingyun He & Yinguo Li & Nana Liu & Yanlin Ding, 2020. "Predicting loan default in peer‐to‐peer lending using narrative data," Journal of Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(2), pages 260-280, March.
    7. Zanin, Luca, 2020. "Combining multiple probability predictions in the presence of class imbalance to discriminate between potential bad and good borrowers in the peer-to-peer lending market," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    8. Carlos Serrano-Cinca & Begoña Gutiérrez-Nieto & Luz López-Palacios, 2015. "Determinants of Default in P2P Lending," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mengyin Li & Phillip H. Phan & Xian Sun, 2021. "Business Friendliness: A Double-Edged Sword," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Gaigalienė Asta & Česnys Dovydas, 2018. "Determinants of Default in Lithuanian Peer-To-Peer Platforms," Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, Sciendo, vol. 80(1), pages 19-36, December.
    3. Hyunwoo Woo & So Young Sohn, 2022. "A credit scoring model based on the Myers–Briggs type indicator in online peer-to-peer lending," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Xia, Yufei & Zhao, Junhao & He, Lingyun & Li, Yinguo & Yang, Xiaoli, 2021. "Forecasting loss given default for peer-to-peer loans via heterogeneous stacking ensemble approach," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 37(4), pages 1590-1613.
    5. Li, Zhiyong & Li, Aimin & Bellotti, Anthony & Yao, Xiao, 2023. "The profitability of online loans: A competing risks analysis on default and prepayment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 306(2), pages 968-985.
    6. Jin, Ming & Yin, Mingmei & Chen, Zhongfei, 2021. "Do investors prefer borrowers from high level of trust cities? Evidence from China’s P2P market," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    7. Samuel Ribeiro-Navarrete & Juan Piñeiro-Chousa & M. Ángeles López-Cabarcos & Daniel Palacios-Marqués, 2022. "Crowdlending: mapping the core literature and research frontiers," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 16(8), pages 2381-2411, November.
    8. Štefan Lyócsa & Petra Vašaničová & Branka Hadji Misheva & Marko Dávid Vateha, 2022. "Default or profit scoring credit systems? Evidence from European and US peer-to-peer lending markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 8(1), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Xueru Chen & Xiaoji Hu & Shenglin Ben, 2021. "How do reputation, structure design and FinTech ecosystem affect the net cash inflow of P2P lending platforms? Evidence from China," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(4), pages 1055-1082, December.
    10. Xi Yang & Wenjuan Fan & Shanlin Yang, 2020. "Identifying the Influencing Factors on Investors’ Investment Behavior: An Empirical Study Focusing on the Chinese P2P Lending Market," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-21, July.
    11. Zhao Wang & Cuiqing Jiang & Huimin Zhao, 2022. "Know Where to Invest: Platform Risk Evaluation in Online Lending," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 765-783, September.
    12. Wang, Qi & Xiong, Xiong & Zheng, Zunxin, 2021. "Platform Characteristics and Online Peer-to-Peer Lending: Evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 38(C).
    13. Wu, Yu & Zhang, Tong, 2021. "Can credit ratings predict defaults in peer-to-peer online lending? Evidence from a Chinese platform," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 40(C).
    14. Chen, Pei-Fen & Lo, Shihmin & Tang, Hai-Yuan, 2022. "What if borrowers stop paying their loans? Investors’ rates of return on a peer-to-peer lending platform," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 359-377.
    15. Benjamin Käfer, 2016. "Peer-to-Peer Lending – A (Financial Stability) Risk Perspective," MAGKS Papers on Economics 201622, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Faculty of Business Administration and Economics, Department of Economics (Volkswirtschaftliche Abteilung).
    16. Sha, Yezhou, 2022. "Rating manipulation and creditworthiness for platform economy: Evidence from peer-to-peer lending," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 84(C).
    17. Zhang, Zan & Hu, Wenjun & Chang, Tsangyao, 2019. "Nonlinear effects of P2P lending on bank loans in a Panel Smooth Transition Regression model," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 468-473.
    18. Liu, Yi & Yang, Menglong & Wang, Yudong & Li, Yongshan & Xiong, Tiancheng & Li, Anzhe, 2022. "Applying machine learning algorithms to predict default probability in the online credit market: Evidence from China," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    19. Wang, Congcong & Tong, Lin, 2020. "Lender rationality and trade-off behavior: Evidence from Lending Club and Renrendai," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 55-66.
    20. Serena Gallo, 2021. "Fintech platforms: Lax or careful borrowers’ screening?," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 7(1), pages 1-33, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:compec:v:62:y:2023:i:4:d:10.1007_s10614-022-10308-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.