Valuing Easements: A Simple Bargaining Framework
The literatureâ€™s guidance on appraising easement values is limited, such as the sometimes unworkable advice to locate appropriate comparables. A simple economic analysis involving applications of bargaining theory (splitting a cooperative surplus) and game theory (anticipating other partiesâ€™ actions) might provide a viable alternative means of analysis in some easement situations.
Volume (Year): 16 (1998)
Issue (Month): 2 ()
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: American Real Estate Society Clemson University School of Business & Behavioral Science Department of Finance 401 Sirrine Hall Clemson, SC 29634-1323|
Web page: http://www.aresnet.org/
|Order Information:|| Postal: Diane Quarles American Real Estate Society Manager of Member Services Clemson University Box 341323 Clemson, SC 29634-1323|
Web: http://pages.jh.edu/jrer/about/get.htm Email:
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Colwell, Peter F & Yavas, Abdullah, 1994. "The Demand for Agricultural Land and Strategic Bidding in Auctions," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 8(2), pages 137-149, March.
- Kim, Taewon, 1989. "Bidding in Real Estate: A Game Theoretic Approach," The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, Springer, vol. 2(4), pages 239-251, December.
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jre:issued:v:16:n:2:1998:p:127-138. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (JRER Graduate Assistant/Webmaster)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.