IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/wjel11/v15y2025i8p239.html

A Systematic Literature Review on Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in EFL Reading

Author

Listed:
  • Xing Liu
  • Marlia Puteh

Abstract

Critical thinking (CT) is crucial in teaching reading in English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Nonetheless, there remains a dearth of comprehensive research and insight into applying CT taxonomies, successful pedagogical practices, and teacher challenges in improving CT skills in EFL reading. This systematic literature review examines effective CT taxonomies, pedagogical strategies, and challenges in improving CT skills within EFL reading instruction. It synthesizes findings from 11 empirical studies published between 2014 and 2024, selected from Scopus and Web of Science databases using the PRISMA framework along with predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The findings reveal that Bloom's taxonomy is the predominant framework alongside three significant teaching approaches in cultivating CT skills- traditional, constructivist, and technology-enhanced. Traditional approaches typically rely on teacher-centred instruction, including grammar teaching, text analysis, and comprehension exercises, which prioritize factual recall rather than fostering deep analytical thinking. The constructivist approach includes project-based learning, survey-question-read-recite-review, question-answer-relationships, and the exposure-exploration-evaluation model. The technology-enhanced approach, including online classes, flipped classroom teaching, and asynchronous web-based collaboration, has effectively cultivated CT skills. Despite the increasing integration of CT-based instructional frameworks and strategies, challenges remain in educators' pedagogical competence, instructional methodologies, teaching resources, assessment instruments, and professional development. This study points out that it takes more research to create context-specific CT pedagogical models, enhance teacher training programs, and refine assessment frameworks to successfully integrate CT skills into EFL reading instruction.

Suggested Citation

  • Xing Liu & Marlia Puteh, 2025. "A Systematic Literature Review on Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills in EFL Reading," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 15(8), pages 239-239, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/download/28369/17264
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/wjel/article/view/28369
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yang Liu, 2017. "Critical Literacy Practices in EFL Reading Classroom -An Experimental Study towards Chinese University Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 133-133, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      JEL classification:

      • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
      • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:wjel11:v:15:y:2025:i:8:p:239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://wjel.sciedupress.com .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.