IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/ijhe11/v8y2019i3p191.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Patterns of Interaction on Peer Feedback: Pair Dynamics in Developing Students’ Writing Skills

Author

Listed:
  • Sirikarn Kuyyogsuy

Abstract

The study investigated students’ patterns of interaction and their viewpoints toward incorporating peer feedback in L2 writing class, making use of a video stimulated recall (VSR) interview and the compositions. Data were analyzed qualitatively; two groups of six students with mixed English proficiency were analyzed in terms of the language-related episodes (LREs). The participants of the study were 21 undergraduate students, majoring in English in a university in the three southernmost border provinces of Thailand. For data analysis, peer dialogues were recoded, transcribed and coded to identify students’ patterns of interactions in terms of collaborative, expert/novice, dominant/dominant and dominant/passive patterns, based on Storch’s (2002) scheme. Moreover, the findings revealed that the students’ English proficiency level did not influence the LREs and their writing ability. Additionally, students’ writing performance was improved in the identified patterns of the collaborative and expert/novice instances. Specifically, students perceived the writing process, developed affective strategies, reinforced their critical thinking ability and enhanced their social interaction skills.  Besides, it encouraged them to become more effectively autonomous learners. Hence, peer feedback should be implemented in L2 writing. Â

Suggested Citation

  • Sirikarn Kuyyogsuy, 2019. "Patterns of Interaction on Peer Feedback: Pair Dynamics in Developing Students’ Writing Skills," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(3), pages 191-191, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/download/15607/9681
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/ijhe/article/view/15607
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Fernanda Poveda de Brusa & Liliya Harutyunyan, 2019. "Peer Review: A Tool to Enhance the Quality of Academic Written Productions," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(5), pages 1-30, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sirikarn Kuyyogsuy, 2019. "Students’ Attitudes Toward Peer Feedback: Paving a Way for Students’ English Writing Improvement," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 107-107, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:ijhe11:v:8:y:2019:i:3:p:191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.