IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v12y2019i7p107.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ Attitudes Toward Peer Feedback: Paving a Way for Students’ English Writing Improvement

Author

Listed:
  • Sirikarn Kuyyogsuy

Abstract

This study aimed at exploring students’ attitudes toward peer feedback to develop their English writing ability. A mixed methods research, an embedded experimental design, was adopted to elicit students’ viewpoints toward peer feedback making use of five-point Likert scale questionnaires comprising 36 statements and six open-ended questions, which were conducted to 21 undergraduate students majoring in English in one university in the three Southern border provinces of Thailand. For the data analysis, A paired samples t-test was quantitatively analyzed, wherereas content themantic analysis was adopted for qualitative data. The overall findings illustrated that the students had a positive attitude toward using peer feedback that achieved a high level in four domains in terms of the writing process, affective strategies, critical thinking skills and social interaction ability. From the result, it could also be seen that students understood about the writing strategy and were able to conduct peer feedback process more effectively, produced improved writing performance with better grammar structure. Additionally, discussing by peers evevated critical thinking skills and developed social skills through working collaboratively. Importantly, peer feedback process supports a student-centered approach and allows students to become more autonomous learners in writing. Consequently, peer feedback should be taken into consideration in the curricula of L2 writing.

Suggested Citation

  • Sirikarn Kuyyogsuy, 2019. "Students’ Attitudes Toward Peer Feedback: Paving a Way for Students’ English Writing Improvement," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(7), pages 107-107, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:7:p:107
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/39822/40770
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/39822
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Maria Fernanda Poveda de Brusa & Liliya Harutyunyan, 2019. "Peer Review: A Tool to Enhance the Quality of Academic Written Productions," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(5), pages 1-30, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sirikarn Kuyyogsuy, 2019. "Patterns of Interaction on Peer Feedback: Pair Dynamics in Developing Students’ Writing Skills," International Journal of Higher Education, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(3), pages 191-191, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:12:y:2019:i:7:p:107. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.