IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/bmr111/v5y2016i2p42-57.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Results of the Research on Prevention of Mobbing/Bullying as a Psycho-Social Stressor when Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility

Author

Listed:
  • Jolita Vveinhardt
  • Regina Andriukaitiene

Abstract

This paper examines the results of the empirical research aimed to identify the prevalence of mobbing/bullying as a psycho-social stressor in socially responsible organizations as well as in the ones that do not adhere to a sense of corporate social responsibility. The aim of the research- to identify the prevalence of MBPS in organizations carrying corporate social responsibility and in organizations not practicing corporate social responsibility. The objectives of the research- (1) to validate the methodology of the research specifying the structure of the instrument; (2) to present the psychosomatic characteristics of the instrument; (3) to assess the prevalence of MBPS in regard to socio-demographic criteria. The methods of the research- analysis and synthesis of scientific literature, questionnaire survey based on validated questionnaire, statistical analysis and comparison. The paper presents the introduction, the methodology of the research, the psycho-metric characteristics of the questionnaire and the socio-demographic data from the respondents as well other aspects in regard to the data.

Suggested Citation

  • Jolita Vveinhardt & Regina Andriukaitiene, 2016. "Results of the Research on Prevention of Mobbing/Bullying as a Psycho-Social Stressor when Implementing Corporate Social Responsibility," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 5(2), pages 42-57, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:42-57
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/download/9726/5876
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/bmr/article/view/9726
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jolita Vveinhardt & Egle Stonkute, 2015. "Corporate Social Responsibility as a Brand: Practical Activity or Social Hypocrisy?," International Conference on Marketing and Business Development Journal, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, vol. 1(1), pages 9-20, July.
    2. Faria, João Ricardo & Mixon, Franklin G. & Salter, Sean P., 2012. "An economic model of workplace mobbing in academe," Economics of Education Review, Elsevier, vol. 31(5), pages 720-726.
    3. Pranas Zukauskas & Jolita Vveinhardt & Borisas Melnikas & Martin Grančay, 2015. "Dynamics of Attack Actions in the Mobbing Strategy: The Case of Lithuania," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 16(4), pages 733-752, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Timothy Perri, 2018. "Economics of evaluation (with special reference to promotion and tenure committees)," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 1-19, February.
    2. Amina Muazzam & Ambreen Anjum & Anna Visvizi, 2020. "Problem-Focused Coping Strategies, Workplace Bullying, and Sustainability of HEIs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-13, December.
    3. João R. Faria & Franklin G. Mixon & Kamal P. Upadhyaya, 2016. "Human capital, collegiality, and stardom in economics: empirical analysis," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 106(3), pages 917-943, March.
    4. João Ricardo Faria & Franklin G. Mixon, 2020. "The Peter and Dilbert Principles applied to academe," Economics of Governance, Springer, vol. 21(2), pages 115-132, June.
    5. Joao Ricardo Faria & Peter McAdam, 2014. "Does Tenure Make Researchers Less Productive? The Case of the “Specialist”," School of Economics Discussion Papers 0514, School of Economics, University of Surrey.
    6. João Ricardo Faria & Peter F. Wanke & João J. Ferreira & Franklin G. Mixon, 2018. "Research and innovation in higher education: empirical evidence from research and patenting in Brazil," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 116(1), pages 487-504, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:bmr111:v:5:y:2016:i:2:p:42-57. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Simon Lee (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://bmr.sciedupress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.