IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/jfr/afr111/v3y2014i3p27.html

The Presentation Arrangements of Pro Forma Earnings Disclosures: Managerial Incentives and Market Responses

Author

Listed:
  • Guannan Wang

Abstract

This study examines whether the presentation of pro forma earnings disclosures within earnings announcements reflects managerial incentives, as well as the impact of these presentation decisions on equity market pricing of earnings. Using hand-collected data, I measure “presentation†along two dimensions- emphasis of pro forma earnings within the earnings announcement, and the display format of earnings. Consistent with expectations, I document three empirical regularities. First, these presentation decisions appear to reflect managerial opportunism, such as the desire to beat benchmark earnings. Second, these decisions affect the market reaction to disclosed earnings. Finally, implementation of Regulation G, which mandated improved reconciliation of pro forma earnings to GAAP earnings, reduces both opportunistic presentation as well as the influence of presentation arrangements over investors’ decision making. Overall, the results suggest that presentation of pro forma earnings also reflects managerial incentives and market pricing, and that regulatory efforts to mitigate these effects have been successful.

Suggested Citation

  • Guannan Wang, 2014. "The Presentation Arrangements of Pro Forma Earnings Disclosures: Managerial Incentives and Market Responses," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(3), pages 1-27, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:3:y:2014:i:3:p:27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/download/5073/3037
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.sciedupress.com/journal/index.php/afr/article/view/5073
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edward J. Riedl & Suraj Srinivasan, 2010. "Signaling Firm Performance Through Financial Statement Presentation: An Analysis Using Special Items," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 8-8, March.
    2. Edward J. Riedl & Suraj Srinivasan, 2010. "Signaling Firm Performance Through Financial Statement Presentation: An Analysis Using Special Items," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1), pages 289-332, March.
    3. Bhattacharya, Nilabhra & Black, Ervin L. & Christensen, Theodore E. & Larson, Chad R., 2003. "Assessing the relative informativeness and permanence of pro forma earnings and GAAP operating earnings," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 36(1-3), pages 285-319, December.
    4. Allee, Kristian D. & Bhattacharya, Nilabhra & Black, Ervin L. & Christensen, Theodore E., 2007. "Pro forma disclosure and investor sophistication: External validation of experimental evidence using archival data," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 201-222, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Han-Chung & Lee, Yen-Jung & Lo, Sheng-Yi & Yu, Yong, 2021. "Qualitative characteristics of non-GAAP disclosures and non-GAAP earnings quality," Journal of Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(1).
    2. Edith Leung & David Veenman, 2018. "Non‐GAAP Earnings Disclosure in Loss Firms," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 56(4), pages 1083-1137, September.
    3. Steven Young, 2014. "The drivers, consequences and policy implications of non-GAAP earnings reporting," Accounting and Business Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 44(4), pages 444-465, August.
    4. Mary E. Barth & Ian D. Gow & Daniel J. Taylor, 2012. "Why do pro forma and Street earnings not reflect changes in GAAP? Evidence from SFAS 123R," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 17(3), pages 526-562, September.
    5. Florian Meier, 2020. "The Age of Cheap Money and Passive Investing: Are Pro Forma Earnings Value Relevant?," Journal of Finance and Investment Analysis, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 9(2), pages 1-1.
    6. Haeyoung Shin & Michael Lacina & Shanshan Pan, 2024. "The order in a series of continuous special items and the likelihood of income classification shifting," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 63(3), pages 829-862, October.
    7. Jason V. Chen & Kurt H. Gee & Jed J. Neilson, 2021. "Disclosure Prominence and the Quality of Non‐GAAP Earnings," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 59(1), pages 163-213, March.
    8. He, Liyu, 2020. "Discount rate behaviour in fair value reporting," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 28(C).
    9. Claudia Arena & Simona Catuogno & Nicola Moscariello, 2021. "The unusual debate on non-GAAP reporting in the current standard practice. The lens of corporate governance," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 25(3), pages 655-684, September.
    10. Shanti, 2016. "Mental Accounting in Managers� Preferences Related to Aggregation Versus Disaggregation Income Statement Items," GATR Journals jber114, Global Academy of Training and Research (GATR) Enterprise.
    11. Silvia Gardini & F. Marta L. Di Lascio & Franco Visani, 2017. "Opportunism in disclosing pro-forma indicators: rationale and contextual drivers," BEMPS - Bozen Economics & Management Paper Series BEMPS42, Faculty of Economics and Management at the Free University of Bozen.
    12. Guragai, Binod & Attachot, Weerapat & Peabody, S. Drew, 2020. "Financial statement presentation of discontinued operations: Determinants and consequences," Advances in accounting, Elsevier, vol. 49(C).
    13. Yu-An Chen & Ann F. Medinets & Dan Palmon, 2022. "Disclosure regulations work: The case of regulation G," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 1037-1062, April.
    14. Theodore E. Christensen & Enrique Gomez & Matthew Ma & Jing Pan, 2021. "Analysts’ role in shaping non-GAAP reporting: evidence from a natural experiment," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 172-217, March.
    15. Zalata, Alaa Mansour & Roberts, Clare, 2017. "Managing earnings using classification shifting: UK evidence," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 52-65.
    16. Chen, Chen & Hanlon, Dean & Khedmati, Mehdi & Wake, James, 2023. "Annual report readability and equity mispricing," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 19(3).
    17. Kalyani Mulchandani & Ketan Mulchandani, 2022. "Does institutional ownership limit classification shifting: evidence from Indian firms," International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 19(4), pages 466-477, December.
    18. Barua, Abhijit & Kim, Jung Hoon, 2017. "Reporting order of financial statements in SEC filings: Evidence from 10-K filings of S&P 500 entities," Research in Accounting Regulation, Elsevier, vol. 29(2), pages 167-171.
    19. Gaynor, Lisa Milici & McDaniel, Linda & Yohn, Teri Lombardi, 2011. "Fair value accounting for liabilities: The role of disclosures in unraveling the counterintuitive income statement effect from credit risk changes," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 125-134, April.
    20. Partha Mohanram & Wei Sun & Baohua Xin & Jigao Zhu, 2025. "Does financial information presentation format matter? Evidence from Chinese firms’ reporting of research and development expense," Review of Accounting Studies, Springer, vol. 30(2), pages 1638-1682, June.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:jfr:afr111:v:3:y:2014:i:3:p:27. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sciedu Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.