IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/isp/journl/v12y2018i1p216-227.html

Incorporation Of Management Control In The Analysis Of University Environmental Management

Author

Listed:
  • Jennifer L. Gómez
  • Liliana D. Monroy

Abstract

The studies consulted at national and international level analyze and characterize the background, challenges and environmental management practices developed in different university campuses. In this regard, it is identified that there is a lack of studies on the Management Control Systems (MCS) existent in the environmental actions carried out by the universities. However, management control is the process by which managers ensure that resources are effective and efficient to achieve the objectives of the organization (Anthony, 1965; Quoted in Straub & Zecher, 2013), this paper shows management control as a potential tool that can be used in the analysis of university environmental management to achieve a committed management with organizational sustainability. To this end, the proposals of the most relevant MCS models in the academic literature will be analyzed, such as: a) Simons’ levers of the control framework (1995), b) Otley's performance management framework (1999), c) Ferreira and Otley’s performance management systems framework (2009), d) Broadbent and Laughlin’s performance management system (2009), and e) Malmi and Brown’s the Management Control Systems package (2008). As a result of the research, the characterization of the contributions and limitations of these systems will be obtained, so that the feedback provided can be used in the process of continuous improvement of the university environmental management.

Suggested Citation

  • Jennifer L. Gómez & Liliana D. Monroy, 2018. "Incorporation Of Management Control In The Analysis Of University Environmental Management," Economy & Business Journal, International Scientific Publications, Bulgaria, vol. 12(1), pages 216-227.
    • Handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:216-227
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.scientific-publications.net/get/1000031/1536784287860693.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martina K. Linnenluecke & Sally V. Russell & Andrew Griffiths, 2009. "Subcultures and sustainability practices: the impact on understanding corporate sustainability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(7), pages 432-452, November.
    2. Erik Strauß & Christina Zecher, 2013. "Management control systems: a review," Metrika: International Journal for Theoretical and Applied Statistics, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 233-268, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Berend van der Kolk & Wesley Kaufmann, 2018. "Performance measurement, cognitive dissonance and coping strategies: exploring individual responses to NPM-inspired output control," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 29(2), pages 93-113, August.
    2. Helena Costa Oliveira & Marta Gomes & Isabel Maldonado & Susana Bastos & Paulino Silva, 2025. "Integrating the SDGs into Corporate Strategy: A Case Study of EDP Group," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-28, June.
    3. Raphaëlle Stewart & Faheem Ali & Casper Boks & Niki Bey, 2018. "Architect, Catalyst, Advocate, and Prophet: A Four-Lens View of Companies to Support Ecodesign Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-27, September.
    4. Catherine Le Roux & Marius Pretorius, 2016. "Conceptualizing the Limiting Issues Inhibiting Sustainability Embeddedness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, April.
    5. Anca Băndoi & Claudiu George Bocean & Mara Del Baldo & Lucian Mandache & Leonardo Geo Mănescu & Cătălina Soriana Sitnikov, 2021. "Including Sustainable Reporting Practices in Corporate Management Reports: Assessing the Impact of Transparency on Economic Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, January.
    6. Helmut Wasserbacher & Martin Spindler, 2021. "Machine Learning for Financial Forecasting, Planning and Analysis: Recent Developments and Pitfalls," Papers 2107.04851, arXiv.org.
    7. Szutowski Dawid, 2019. "Management Control Systems and Innovation Process Efficiency. A Conceptual Model," Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia, Sciendo, vol. 19(2), pages 160-175, December.
    8. Lu Jiao & Graeme Harrison & Jinhua Chen, 2023. "Revenue growth in not‐for‐profit organisations: The effects of interactive and diagnostic controls and organisational culture," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 63(2), pages 2273-2294, June.
    9. Stefan N. Groesser & Niklas Jovy, 2016. "Business model analysis using computational modeling: a strategy tool for exploration and decision-making," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 61-88, February.
    10. Zurah Chepkoech Mohammed & Vincent Ngeno & Charles Lagat, 2019. "Environmentally Sustainable Supply Chain Practices, Organisation Culture on Firm Performance. A Mediation Approach," International Journal of Emerging Trends in Social Sciences, Scientific Publishing Institute, vol. 6(2), pages 34-45.
    11. Kristina Ročkutė & Inga Minelgaitė & Ligita Zailskaitė-Jakštė & Robertas Damaševičius, 2018. "Brand Awareness in the Context of Mistrust: The Case Study of an Employment Agency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-13, March.
    12. Hadi Al-Abrrow & Jaber Ali & Alhamzah Alnoor, 2022. "Multilevel Influence of Routine Redesigning, Legitimacy and Functional Affordance on Sustainability Accounting: Mediating Role of Organizational Sense-making," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 23(2), pages 287-312, April.
    13. Jeremy Morrow & Simon Mowatt, 2020. "The freedom within framework: A multilevel perspective on developing green capabilities through routines in service organisations," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(7), pages 2895-2907, November.
    14. Rodrigo Lozano, 2018. "Proposing a Definition and a Framework of Organisational Sustainability: A Review of Efforts and a Survey of Approaches to Change," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Margaret Brunton & Gabriel Eweje & Nazim Taskin, 2017. "Communicating Corporate Social Responsibility to Internal Stakeholders: Walking the Walk or Just Talking the Talk?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(1), pages 31-48, January.
    16. Rodrigo Lozano, 2020. "Analysing the use of tools, initiatives, and approaches to promote sustainability in corporations," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(2), pages 982-998, March.
    17. Tiina Onkila, 2015. "Pride or Embarrassment? Employees’ Emotions and Corporate Social Responsibility," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(4), pages 222-236, July.
    18. Zahid, Muhammad & Rahman, Haseeb Ur & Ullah, Zabeeh & Muhammad, Ali, 2021. "Sustainability and branchless banking: The development and validation of a distinct measurement scale," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Stefanie Einhorn & Bernhard Fietz & Thomas W. Guenther & Edeltraud Guenther, 2024. "The relationship of organizational culture with management control systems and environmental management control systems," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(8), pages 2321-2371, August.
    20. Ewelina Zarzycka & Justyna Dobroszek & Lauri Lepistö & Sinikka Moilanen, 2019. "Coexistence of innovation and standardization: evidence from the lean environment of business process outsourcing," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 30(3), pages 251-286, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A - General Economics and Teaching

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:isp:journl:v:12:y:2018:i:1:p:216-227. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Svetoslav Ivanov (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.scientific-publications.net/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.