IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orstsc/v8y2023i2p193-201.html

Corporate Purpose in Comparative Perspective: The Role of Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Ruth V. Aguilera

    (D’Amore-McKim School of Business, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115; ESADE Business School, Ramon Llull University, 08034 Barcelona, Spain)

Abstract

Corporate purpose has become a central part of doing business as usual and in the social movement to involve corporations in solving complex societal and environmental challenges. In this essay, I first deconstruct what corporate purpose means from a sociological perspective, and I submit that it is important to identify to whom that purpose is targeted. Second, I seek to make the point that corporate purpose is not universal in that there is not a one-rule-fits-all template on how to develop corporate purpose. I draw on comparative corporate governance, stakeholder management, and institutional theory arguments to illustrate how corporate purpose means different things in different societies and that the departure point of the emanation of corporate purpose varies across countries. This differential meaning is explained in part by the institutional setting as well as very different societal expectations of corporations. Finally, building on insights from existing corporate governance research, I argue that stakeholder engagement can be a useful tool toward effectively deploying corporate purpose.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruth V. Aguilera, 2023. "Corporate Purpose in Comparative Perspective: The Role of Governance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 193-201, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:8:y:2023:i:2:p:193-201
    DOI: 10.1287/stsc.2023.0198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2023.0198
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/stsc.2023.0198?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andreas Georg Scherer & Christian Voegtlin, 2020. "Corporate Governance for Responsible Innovation: Approaches to Corporate Governance and Their Implications for Sustainable Development," Post-Print hal-02623585, HAL.
    2. Dale Griffin & Omrane Guedhami & Chuck C Y Kwok & Kai Li & Liang Shao, 2017. "National culture: The missing country-level determinant of corporate governance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 48(6), pages 740-762, August.
    3. Hart, Oliver & Zingales, Luigi, 2022. "The New Corporate Governance," CEPR Discussion Papers 17276, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    4. Sophie Bacq & Ruth V. Aguilera, 2022. "Stakeholder Governance for Responsible Innovation: A Theory of Value Creation, Appropriation, and Distribution," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(1), pages 29-60, January.
    5. Gerald F. Davis, 2021. "Corporate Purpose Needs Democracy," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(3), pages 902-913, May.
    6. Rosalie L Tung & Günter K Stahl, 2018. "The tortuous evolution of the role of culture in IB research: What we know, what we don’t know, and where we are headed," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 49(9), pages 1167-1189, December.
    7. Hart, Oliver D. & Zingales, Luigi, 2022. "The New Corporate Governance," Working Papers 317, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    8. Ioannis Ioannou & George Serafeim, 2012. "What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 43(9), pages 834-864, December.
    9. James D. Westphal, 2023. "Systemic Symbolic Management, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Corporate Purpose: A Cautionary Tale," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 221-232, June.
    10. Aleksandra Kacperczyk, 2009. "With greater power comes greater responsibility? takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 261-285, March.
    11. Valentina Marano & Steve Sauerwald & Marc Essen, 2022. "The influence of culture on the relationship between women directors and corporate social performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(7), pages 1315-1342, September.
    12. Joseph T. Mahoney, 2023. "Corporate Personhood and Fiduciary Duties as Critical Constructs in Developing Stakeholder Management Theory and Corporate Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 212-220, June.
    13. Graham, John R. & Grennan, Jillian & Harvey, Campbell R. & Rajgopal, Shivaram, 2022. "Corporate culture: Evidence from the field," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 146(2), pages 552-593.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Russell Abratt & Emmanuel Silva Quaye & Nicola Kleyn, 2025. "Conscientious corporate brands: the roles of organisational purpose, organisational culture, brand authenticity and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 32(5), pages 418-437, September.
    2. William Ocasio & Matthew Kraatz & David Chandler, 2023. "Making Sense of Corporate Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 123-138, June.
    3. Rodolphe Durand, 2023. "From the Boardroom: Making Purpose Research Relevant for Practice," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 149-158, June.
    4. Jérémy Lévêque & Victor Acker & Kevin Levillain & Blanche Segrestin, 2025. "Dual Purpose Corporations and Boards Expertise - an Exploratory Study in French Société à Mission," Post-Print hal-04914415, HAL.
    5. Maizatul Akmal Musa & Shahril Eashak Ismail, 2025. "Stakeholder Participation and Social Responsibility: A Dynamic Framework for Corporate Governance," Information Management and Business Review, AMH International, vol. 17(3), pages 68-85.
    6. Joseph T. Mahoney, 2023. "Corporate Personhood and Fiduciary Duties as Critical Constructs in Developing Stakeholder Management Theory and Corporate Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 212-220, June.
    7. Tjandra, Nathalia C. & Feri, Alessandro & Ind, Nicholas & Iglesias, Oriol & Backhaus, Christof & Seegebarth, Barbara, 2025. "The core attributes of conscientious brands: A stakeholder perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sarah Kaplan, 2023. "The Promises and Perils of Corporate Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 288-301, June.
    2. Kamini Gupta & Donal Crilly & Thomas Greckhamer, 2020. "Stakeholder engagement strategies, national institutions, and firm performance: A configurational perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1869-1900, October.
    3. Estévez-Mendoza, Carlos & Montoro-Sánchez, Ángeles, 2024. "Exploring the relationship between innovation and corporate governance," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    4. Anita M. McGahan, 2023. "The New Stakeholder Theory on Organizational Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 245-255, June.
    5. Anthony Goerzen & Michael Sartor & Kristin Brandl & Stacey Fitzsimmons, 2023. "Widening the lens: Multilevel drivers of firm corporate social performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(1), pages 42-60, February.
    6. Valentina Marano & Steve Sauerwald & Marc Essen, 2022. "The influence of culture on the relationship between women directors and corporate social performance," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 53(7), pages 1315-1342, September.
    7. Montagnes, B. Pablo & Peskowitz, Zachary & Sridharan, Suhas A., 2025. "How well do voting choice policies represent investor preferences?," Working Papers 371, The University of Chicago Booth School of Business, George J. Stigler Center for the Study of the Economy and the State.
    8. Maria Roszkowska‐Menkes, 2025. "ESG pay and corporate social irresponsibility: Does culture matter?," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(4), pages 1860-1885, October.
    9. Rong Ma & Rakesh B. Sambharya, 2024. "International diversification and corporate social responsibility disclosure quality: Employee versus environmental dimensions," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(5), pages 4248-4264, September.
    10. Hernández-Atienza, Fernando & Rodríguez-Sanz, Juan Antonio & Tejerina-Gaite, Fernando, 2024. "The pathways of board diversity in European contexts: Exploring the influence of director types on firm performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(PA).
    11. Srivastava, Saurabh & Singh, Shiwangi & Dhir, Sanjay, 2020. "Culture and International business research: A review and research agenda," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 29(4).
    12. Bejan, Camelia, 2024. "On the shareholders versus stakeholders debate," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 218(C), pages 68-88.
    13. Ranjan DasGupta & Arup Roy, 2025. "Performance shortfall condition and environmental, social, governance performance: Does economic policy uncertainty and national culture matter?," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 36(1), pages 81-132, March.
    14. Shira Cohen & Igor Kadach & Gaizka Ormazabal & Stefan Reichelstein, 2023. "Executive Compensation Tied to ESG Performance: International Evidence," Journal of Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 61(3), pages 805-853, June.
    15. Jo, Hoje & Song, Moon H. & Tsang, Albert, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder governance around the world," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 42-69.
    16. Messner, Wolfgang & Migliorini, Monica, 2024. "Fifty Shades of Ads. The Influence of Cultural and Institutional Factors on Television Advertisement Expenditure," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(6).
    17. Fang, Yiwei & Fiordelisi, Franco & Hasan, Iftekhar & Leung, Woon Sau & Wong, Gabriel, 2023. "Corporate culture and firm value: Evidence from crisis," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    18. Mazzi, Francesco & Slack, Richard & Tsalavoutas, Ioannis, 2018. "The effect of corruption and culture on mandatory disclosure compliance levels: Goodwill reporting in Europe," Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 52-73.
    19. Efing, Matthias & Ehmann, Stefanie & Kampkötter, Patrick & Moritz, Raphael, 2024. "All Hat and No Cattle? ESG Incentives in Executive Compensation," CEPR Discussion Papers 19610, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    20. Dongyoung Lee, 2020. "Corporate social responsibility of U.S.‐listed firms headquartered in tax havens," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(9), pages 1547-1571, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:8:y:2023:i:2:p:193-201. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.