IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/jbrese/v201y2025ics0148296325005673.html

The core attributes of conscientious brands: A stakeholder perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Tjandra, Nathalia C.
  • Feri, Alessandro
  • Ind, Nicholas
  • Iglesias, Oriol
  • Backhaus, Christof
  • Seegebarth, Barbara

Abstract

Conscientious brands go beyond corporate social responsibility initiatives, which are often disconnected from brand strategy, by embedding a moral belief system that drives strategic decisions and actions, and spurs positive transformative change. Recent research has highlighted several key attributes of conscientious brands, but most studies have only been based on the views of managers. To better understand the construct from a diverse stakeholder perspective, we conducted 68 in-depth qualitative interviews with senior managers of global brands, senior managers of marketing agencies, and consumers. The findings show that conscientious brands are driven by a transformative purpose, and a belief in stakeholder fairness, temporal responsibility and organizational openness. Additionally, the actions that result from beliefs are rooted in moral integrity and measured through key performance indicators. The findings also provide valuable nuances on the aligned, complementary, and conflictual perspectives of each stakeholder group.

Suggested Citation

  • Tjandra, Nathalia C. & Feri, Alessandro & Ind, Nicholas & Iglesias, Oriol & Backhaus, Christof & Seegebarth, Barbara, 2025. "The core attributes of conscientious brands: A stakeholder perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325005673
    DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115744
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0148296325005673
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115744?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kaptein, Muel & Wempe, Johan, 2002. "The Balanced Company: A Theory of Corporate Integrity," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199255511.
    2. Marina Gigliotti & Andrea Runfola, 2022. "A stakeholder perspective on managing tensions in hybrid organizations: Analyzing fair trade for a sustainable development," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3198-3215, November.
    3. Claudine Gartenberg & Andrea Prat & George Serafeim, 2019. "Corporate Purpose and Financial Performance," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(1), pages 1-18, February.
    4. Mantovani, Danielle & de Andrade, Lucas Magalhães & Negrão, Angela, 2017. "How motivations for CSR and consumer-brand social distance influence consumers to adopt pro-social behavior," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 156-163.
    5. Oriol Iglesias & Nicholas Ind, 2020. "Towards a theory of conscientious corporate brand co-creation: the next key challenge in brand management," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 27(6), pages 710-720, November.
    6. Patel, Pankaj C. & João Guedes, Maria & Pagano, Michael S. & Olson, Gerard T., 2020. "Industry profitability matters: The value of sustainable growth rate and distance from bankruptcy as enablers of venture survival," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 80-92.
    7. Lori Holder-Webb & Jeffrey Cohen & Leda Nath & David Wood, 2009. "The Supply of Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosures Among U.S. Firms," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 497-527, February.
    8. Olivier Boiral, 2013. "Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(7), pages 1036-1071, September.
    9. Werhane, Patricia H., 2006. "A Place for Philosophers in Applied Ethics and the Role of Moral Reasoning in Moral Imagination: A Response to Richard Rorty," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 401-408, July.
    10. Szerena Szabo & Jane Webster, 2021. "Perceived Greenwashing: The Effects of Green Marketing on Environmental and Product Perceptions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 719-739, July.
    11. Patricia Werhane, 2015. "Competing with Integrity: Richard De George and the Ethics of Global Business," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(4), pages 737-742, April.
    12. Skarmeas, Dionysis & Leonidou, Constantinos N., 2013. "When consumers doubt, Watch out! The role of CSR skepticism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(10), pages 1831-1838.
    13. Cambier, Fanny & Poncin, Ingrid, 2020. "Inferring brand integrity from marketing communications: The effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 260-270.
    14. repec:eme:aaaj00:aaaj-04-2012-00998 is not listed on IDEAS
    15. Saurabh Mishra & Sachin Modi, 2013. "Positive and Negative Corporate Social Responsibility, Financial Leverage, and Idiosyncratic Risk," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 117(2), pages 431-448, October.
    16. Stephanie L. Wang & Yadong Luo & Vladislav Maksimov & Jinyun Sun & Nikhil Celly, 2019. "Achieving Temporal Ambidexterity in New Ventures," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(4), pages 788-822, June.
    17. Alhouti, Sarah & Johnson, Catherine M. & Holloway, Betsy Bugg, 2016. "Corporate social responsibility authenticity: Investigating its antecedents and outcomes," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(3), pages 1242-1249.
    18. Audi, Robert & Murphy, Patrick E., 2006. "The Many Faces of Integrity," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(1), pages 3-21, January.
    19. Ruth V. Aguilera, 2023. "Corporate Purpose in Comparative Perspective: The Role of Governance," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 193-201, June.
    20. Ashish Pandey & Rajen Gupta, 2008. "A Perspective of Collective Consciousness of Business Organizations," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 80(4), pages 889-898, July.
    21. Fuan Li & Sixue Zhang & Xuelian Yang, 2018. "Moral Integrity and Relationship Commitment: An Empirical Examination in a Cross-Cultural Setting," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(3), pages 785-798, September.
    22. Brach, Simon & Walsh, Gianfranco & Shaw, Deirdre, 2018. "Sustainable consumption and third-party certification labels: Consumers’ perceptions and reactions," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(2), pages 254-265.
    23. Sarah Kaplan, 2023. "The Promises and Perils of Corporate Purpose," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 288-301, June.
    24. Olivier Boiral, 2013. "Sustainability reports as simulacra? A counter-account of A and A+ GRI reports," Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 26(7), pages 1036-1071, September.
    25. Jeremy Schwartz, 2016. "Integrity: the virtue of compromise," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 2(1), pages 1-7, December.
    26. Roy Suddaby & Luca Manelli & Ziyun Fan, 2023. "Corporate Purpose: A Social Judgement Perspective," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 8(2), pages 202-211, June.
    27. Bidhan L. Parmar & Adrian Keevil & Andrew C. Wicks, 2019. "People and Profits: The Impact of Corporate Objectives on Employees’ Need Satisfaction at Work," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 154(1), pages 13-33, January.
    28. Hamed Taherdoost, 2016. "Sampling Methods in Research Methodology; How to Choose a Sampling Technique for Research," Post-Print hal-02546796, HAL.
    29. Monika Hajdas & Ryszard Kłeczek, 2021. "The real purpose of purpose-driven branding: consumer empowerment and social transformations," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 28(4), pages 359-373, July.
    30. Abdul Rohmanue & Erik S. Jacobi, 2024. "The influence of marketing communications agencies on activist brands’ moral competency development and ability to engage in authentic brand activism: Wieden+Kennedy ‘Just Does It’," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 31(2), pages 126-139, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Russell Abratt & Emmanuel Silva Quaye & Nicola Kleyn, 2025. "Conscientious corporate brands: the roles of organisational purpose, organisational culture, brand authenticity and corporate social responsibility," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 32(5), pages 418-437, September.
    2. Walter, Nadine & Föhl, Ulrich & Sander, Frauke & Nies, Angelique, 2024. "Act as you preach! Authentic brand purpose versus “woke washing’s” impact on brand credibility: The moderating role of cause involvement and consumer skepticism," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    3. Patrick Velte, 2022. "Does sustainable corporate governance have an impact on materiality disclosure quality in integrated reporting? International evidence," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(6), pages 1655-1670, December.
    4. F. Cappellieri & R. Vinciguerra & A. Ricciardi & M. Pizzo, 2025. "Independent minority directors against self-serving and manipulative practices in non- financial reporting," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 29(2), pages 453-501, June.
    5. William Sun & Simon Robinson & Paweł Łukasz Polowczyk, 2018. "Integrity and Its counterfeits: implications for economy, business and management," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 4(1), pages 1-4, December.
    6. Cambier, Fanny & Poncin, Ingrid, 2020. "Inferring brand integrity from marketing communications: The effects of brand transparency signals in a consumer empowerment context," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 260-270.
    7. Eugene Kang & Nguyen Bao Lam, 2023. "The impact of environmental disclosure on initial public offering underpricing: Sustainable development in Singapore," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(1), pages 119-133, January.
    8. Albrecht, Disen Huang & Anantharaman, Divya & Zhao, Keyi, 2025. "Is a picture worth a thousand words? Image usage in ESG reports," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. C. B. Bhattacharya & Sankar Sen & Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Michael Neureiter, 2023. "Corporate Purpose and Employee Sustainability Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 183(4), pages 963-981, April.
    10. Pham, Hanh Song Thi & Tran, Hien Thi, 2020. "CSR disclosure and firm performance: The mediating role of corporate reputation and moderating role of CEO integrity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 127-136.
    11. Hohenstein, Yannick, 2025. "The impact of profitability on scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions in Europe," Junior Management Science (JUMS), Junior Management Science e. V., vol. 10(2), pages 292-333.
    12. Amin, Abu & Hossain, Md Miran & Lee, Narae & Saadi, Samir, 2025. "Corporate political activities and firms' carbon emissions," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    13. Sheela Sundarasen & Usha Rajagopalan & Beata Zyznarska-Dworczak, 2025. "Sustainability Reporting as a Governance Tool for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): A Bibliometric and Content Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-16, May.
    14. Ashish Ashok Uikey & Ruturaj Baber & Zericho R Marak, 2025. "Transforming Green Transparency into Green Brand Loyalty and Repurchase Intentions: The Role of Brand Image and Credibility among Electric Vehicle Users," Post-Print hal-04925852, HAL.
    15. Hyuck Jin Lee, 2024. "Does corporate ESG, an essential factor for overcoming the climate crisis, affect sustainability: The effects of psychological distance and purchase intention," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 8747-8758, December.
    16. Matthew A. Douglas & Diane A. Mollenkopf & Vincent E. Castillo & John E. Bell & Emily C. Dickey, 2022. "Journeys, Not Destinations: Theorizing a Process View of Supply Chain Integrity," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(1), pages 195-220, November.
    17. Silvia Ruiz & Silvia Romero & Belen Fernandez‐Feijoo, 2021. "Stakeholder engagement is evolving: Do investors play a main role?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1105-1120, February.
    18. Ahsen, Anette von & Gauch, Kevin, 2024. "Opportunities and Challenges of Purpose-Led Companies: An Empirical Study Through Expert Interviews," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 149875, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    19. Kameleddine B. Benameur & Mohamed M. Mostafa & Ahmed Hassanein & Mohammed Z. Shariff & Wasim Al-Shattarat, 2024. "Sustainability reporting scholarly research: a bibliometric review and a future research agenda," Management Review Quarterly, Springer, vol. 74(2), pages 823-866, June.
    20. Jahn, Johannes & Brühl, Rolf, 2019. "Can bad news be good? On the positive and negative effects of including moderately negative information in CSR disclosures," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 117-128.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:jbrese:v:201:y:2025:i:c:s0148296325005673. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/jbusres .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.