IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v33y2022i1p1-18.html

We Are All Theorists of Technology Now: A Relational Perspective on Emerging Technology and Organizing

Author

Listed:
  • Diane E. Bailey

    (Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850)

  • Samer Faraj

    (Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada)

  • Pamela J. Hinds

    (Department of Management Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Paul M. Leonardi

    (Technology Management Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106)

  • Georg von Krogh

    (Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Technologies are changing at a rapid pace and in unpredictable ways. The scale of their impact is also far-reaching. Technologies such as artificial intelligence, data analytics, robotics, digital platforms, social media, blockchain, and 3-D printing affect many parts of the organization simultaneously, enabling new interdependencies within and between units and with actors that many organizations have typically considered to be outside their boundaries. Consequently, today’s emerging technologies have the potential to fundamentally shape all aspects of organizing. This article introduces the special issue “Emerging Technologies and Organizing.” We treat these new technologies as “emerging” because their uses and effects are still varied and have yet to stabilize around a recognizable set of patterns and because the technologies themselves are, by design, always changing and adapting. To theorize the relationship between emerging technologies and organizing, we draw on relational thinking in philosophy and sociology to develop a relational perspective on emerging technologies. Our goal in doing so is to create a new way for organizational scholars to incorporate the ever-increasing role of technology in their theorizing of key organizational processes and phenomena. By developing a relational perspective that treats emerging technologies not as stable entities, but as a set of evolving relations, we provide a novel way for organizational scholars to account for the role of technology in their topics of interest. We sketch the outlines of this relational perspective on emerging technologies and discuss the implications it has for what organizational scholars study and how we study it.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane E. Bailey & Samer Faraj & Pamela J. Hinds & Paul M. Leonardi & Georg von Krogh, 2022. "We Are All Theorists of Technology Now: A Relational Perspective on Emerging Technology and Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:1-18
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1562
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Samer Faraj & Georg von Krogh & Eric Monteiro & Karim R. Lakhani, 2016. "Special Section Introduction—Online Community as Space for Knowledge Flows," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(4), pages 668-684, December.
    2. Paul M. Leonardi, 2021. "COVID‐19 and the New Technologies of Organizing: Digital Exhaust, Digital Footprints, and Artificial Intelligence in the Wake of Remote Work," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(1), pages 249-253, January.
    3. Ryan Allen & Prithwiraj (Raj) Choudhury, 2022. "Algorithm-Augmented Work and Domain Experience: The Countervailing Forces of Ability and Aversion," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 149-169, January.
    4. Yash Raj Shrestha & Vivianna Fang He & Phanish Puranam & Georg von Krogh, 2021. "Algorithm Supported Induction for Building Theory: How Can We Use Prediction Models to Theorize?," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(3), pages 856-880, May.
    5. Paul M. Leonardi, 2007. "Activating the Informational Capabilities of Information Technology for Organizational Change," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 18(5), pages 813-831, October.
    6. Lindsey D. Cameron & Hatim Rahman, 2022. "Expanding the Locus of Resistance: Understanding the Co-constitution of Control and Resistance in the Gig Economy," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 38-58, January.
    7. Marie-Claude Boudreau & Daniel Robey, 2005. "Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 16(1), pages 3-18, February.
    8. Vivianna Fang He & Phanish Puranam & Yash Raj Shrestha & Georg von Krogh, 2020. "Resolving governance disputes in communities: A study of software license decisions," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 41(10), pages 1837-1868, October.
    9. Markus Menz & Sven Kunisch & Julian Birkinshaw & David J. Collis & Nicolai J. Foss & Robert E. Hoskisson & John E. Prescott, 2021. "Corporate Strategy and the Theory of the Firm in the Digital Age," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 58(7), pages 1695-1720, November.
    10. Madeleine Rauch & Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari, 2022. "Waging War from Remote Cubicles: How Workers Cope with Technologies That Disrupt the Meaning and Morality of Their Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 83-104, January.
    11. Hilary Bradbury & Benyamin M. Bergmann Lichtenstein, 2000. "Relationality in Organizational Research: Exploring The Space Between," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 11(5), pages 551-564, October.
    12. Sarah Lebovitz & Hila Lifshitz-Assaf & Natalia Levina, 2022. "To Engage or Not to Engage with AI for Critical Judgments: How Professionals Deal with Opacity When Using AI for Medical Diagnosis," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 126-148, January.
    13. Michael Barrett & Eivor Oborn & Wanda J. Orlikowski & JoAnne Yates, 2012. "Reconfiguring Boundary Relations: Robotic Innovations in Pharmacy Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1448-1466, October.
    14. Karunakaran, Arvind & Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2022. "Crowd-based accountability: examining how social media commentary reconfigures organizational accountability," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 114401, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    15. von Krogh, Georg & Spaeth, Sebastian & Lakhani, Karim R., 2003. "Community, joining, and specialization in open source software innovation: a case study," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1217-1241, July.
    16. Carliss Y. Baldwin & Kim B. Clark, 2000. "Design Rules, Volume 1: The Power of Modularity," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262024667, December.
    17. Cristina Alaimo & Jannis Kallinikos, 2022. "Organizations Decentered: Data Objects, Technology and Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 19-37, January.
    18. Wanda J. Orlikowski & Susan V. Scott, 2014. "What Happens When Evaluation Goes Online? Exploring Apparatuses of Valuation in the Travel Sector," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 25(3), pages 868-891, June.
    19. Shahzad (Shaz) Ansari & Raghu Garud & Arun Kumaraswamy, 2016. "The disruptor's dilemma: TiVo and the U.S. television ecosystem," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(9), pages 1829-1853, September.
    20. Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2014. "What happens when evaluation goes online? Exploring apparatuses of valuation in the travel sector," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 57602, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    21. Yu-Kai Lin & Likoebe M. Maruping, 2022. "Open Source Collaboration in Digital Entrepreneurship," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 212-230, January.
    22. Brian T. Pentland & Youngjin Yoo & Jan Recker & Inkyu Kim, 2022. "From Lock-In to Transformation: A Path-Centric Theory of Emerging Technology and Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 194-211, January.
    23. Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2022. "Organizations decentered: data objects, technology and knowledge," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112470, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    24. Carliss Y. Baldwin, 2019. "Setting the stage for corporate headquarters: a technological explanation for the rise of modern industrial corporations," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 8(1), pages 1-16, December.
    25. Arvind Karunakaran & Wanda J. Orlikowski & Susan V. Scott, 2022. "Crowd-Based Accountability: Examining How Social Media Commentary Reconfigures Organizational Accountability," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 170-193, January.
    26. Georg von Krogh & Eric von Hippel, 2006. "The Promise of Research on Open Source Software," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 975-983, July.
    27. Wanda J. Orlikowski, 1996. "Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 7(1), pages 63-92, March.
    28. Cristina B. Gibson & Patrick D. Dunlop & Ann Majchrzak & Terence Chia, 2022. "Sustaining Effectiveness in Global Teams: The Coevolution of Knowledge Management Activities and Technology Affordances," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 1018-1048, May.
    29. Zlatko Bodrožić & Paul S. Adler, 2022. "Alternative Futures for the Digital Transformation: A Macro-Level Schumpeterian Perspective," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 105-125, January.
    30. Paul M. Leonardi & Diane E. Bailey & Casey S. Pierce, 2019. "The Coevolution of Objects and Boundaries over Time: Materiality, Affordances, and Boundary Salience," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(2), pages 665-686, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahr, Dominik & Odekerken-Schröder, Gaby & Doorn, Jenny van, 2025. "Evolution of service robots in marketing: A relational framework and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    2. Rebecca Karp & Siobhan O’Mahony, 2025. "Confronting the Limits of Symbolic Actions: How Entrepreneurs Narrow the Presentation-Performance Gap," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1643-1675, September.
    3. White, Leroy, 2026. "Fifty years of Soft Operational Research: The contribution of EURO and EJOR to its foundation and development," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 328(3), pages 735-748.
    4. Lulu Yan & Cong Cheng & Ying Zhang & Zefeng Miao, 2025. "Large Language Models in International Business Research: Opportunities, Challenges, and Prospects," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 65(6), pages 1137-1165, December.
    5. Dov Te’eni & Myriam Raymond & Frantz Rowe & Etienne Thénoz & Philippe Trimborn, 2026. "Organizational learning for exploring Generative AI: CORE-sandbox experiments," Post-Print hal-05461433, HAL.
    6. Wang, Kui & He, Junjia & Zhang, Xiaodan & Xiang, Diandian & Zhang, Ping, 2025. "Unraveling the performance puzzle of digital transformation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity and faultline strength," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    7. Qu, Guimin & Jing, Hao, 2025. "Is new technology always good? Artificial intelligence and corporate tax avoidance: Evidence from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    8. Callen Anthony & Beth A. Bechky & Anne-Laure Fayard, 2023. "“Collaborating” with AI: Taking a System View to Explore the Future of Work," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(5), pages 1672-1694, September.
    9. Valtonen, Alena & Saunila, Minna & Ukko, Juhani & Treves, Luke & Ritala, Paavo, 2025. "AI and employee wellbeing in the workplace: An empirical study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    10. Kessler, Alexander & Frank, Hermann & Fuetsch, Elena, 2025. "Conceptualizing digitalization orientation as a strategic posture – How to boost the impact of digital technologies in businesses: A qualitative good practices approach," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    11. Abayomi Baiyere & Markus P. Zimmer & Kalina S. Staykova & Jan Jöhnk, 2025. "Beyond Digital vs. IT: The Untold Story of Their Relationship from an Organizing Logic Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 2039-2075, December.
    12. Chen, Qin & Wang, Hongchuan & Ma, Chengcheng & Ru, Peng, 2025. "How professionals respond to disruptive effects of artificial intelligence on their jurisdiction: The role of interactive governance," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 386(C).
    13. Li, Guoxiang & Wen, Huan & Sun, Qian & Xue, Jinjun, 2025. "The role of the digital economy in promoting energy justice: Evidence from procedural justice and restorative justice," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    14. Manotti, Jacopo & Sanasi, Silvia & Ghezzi, Antonio, 2025. "Sustainable business model innovation: A technology affordance perspective in the New Space Economy," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    15. Sophie Kelmenson & Nichola Lowe & Greg Schrock, 2024. "Working with technology: The case for worker-centered innovation," Local Economy, London South Bank University, vol. 39(7-8), pages 307-324, December.
    16. Beth S. Schinoff & Julianna Pillemer & Kristie M. Rogers & Jennifer Louise Petriglieri, 2025. "Blurring Boundaries in Coworker Relationships: How a Nonwork Setting Becomes a Relational Holding Environment," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 2061-2086, November.
    17. Agnieszka Kasperska & Anna Matysiak & Ewa Cukrowska-Torzewska, 2025. "Career Penalties for Flexible Working: How Organizational Culture Shapes Managerial Decisions," Working Papers 2025-17, Faculty of Economic Sciences, University of Warsaw.
    18. Patrick Nicolas Tinguely & Junghyun Lee & Vivianna Fang He, 2023. "Designing human resource management systems in the age of AI," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(4), pages 263-269, December.
    19. Oluwatobi Yusuf, 2024. "Emerging Technologies To Enhance Optimization In The Process Industries," Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, Open Knowledge, vol. 1(1), pages 188-199.
    20. Hannah Trittin-Ulbrich & Markus P. Zimmer & Stefanie Habersang & Leonhard Dobusch & Maren Gierlich-Joas & Elke Schüßler & Benjamin Mueller & Cristina Mihale-Wilson & Julia Zeller-Lanzl & Stephan Bohn , 2025. "Digital Responsibility: Building Bridges Between Organization Theory and Information Systems," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 77(4), pages 597-642, December.
    21. Moshe Farjoun & Nudrat Mahmood, 2024. "On Habit and Organizing: A Transactional Perspective Relating Firms, Consumers, and Social Institutions," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 1157-1176, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youngjin Yoo & Ola Henfridsson & Jannis Kallinikos & Robert Gregory & Gordon Burtch & Sutirtha Chatterjee & Suprateek Sarker, 2024. "The Next Frontiers of Digital Innovation Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 1507-1523, December.
    2. Alaimo, Cristina & Kallinikos, Jannis, 2022. "Organizations decentered: data objects, technology and knowledge," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112470, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    3. Susan Scott & Wanda Orlikowski, 2022. "The Digital Undertow: How the Corollary Effects of Digital Transformation Affect Industry Standards," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 311-336, March.
    4. Katherine C. Kellogg, 2022. "Local Adaptation Without Work Intensification: Experimentalist Governance of Digital Technology for Mutually Beneficial Role Reconfiguration in Organizations," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 571-599, March.
    5. Saverio Dave Favaron & Giada Di Stefano, 2025. "Let Us Not Speak of Them, But Look and Pass? Organizational Responses to Online Reviews," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 651-676, March.
    6. Vanessa M. Conzon & James C. Mellody, 2025. "Concerted Quantification: How Knowledge Workers Limit Overwork While Maintaining Client Satisfaction," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1834-1860, September.
    7. Scott, Susan V. & Orlikowski, Wanda J., 2022. "The digital undertow: how the corollary effects of digital transformation affect industry standards," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 112426, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    8. Cristina Alaimo & Jannis Kallinikos, 2022. "Organizations Decentered: Data Objects, Technology and Knowledge," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 19-37, January.
    9. Stella Pachidi & Hans Berends & Samer Faraj & Marleen Huysman, 2021. "Make Way for the Algorithms: Symbolic Actions and Change in a Regime of Knowing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 32(1), pages 18-41, January.
    10. Diane E. Bailey, 2022. "Emerging Technologies at Work: Policy Ideas to Address Negative Consequences for Work, Workers, and Society," ILR Review, Cornell University, ILR School, vol. 75(3), pages 527-551, May.
    11. Diane Bailey & Samer Faraj & Pamela Hinds & Georg von Krogh & Paul Leonardi, 2019. "Special Issue of Organization Science: Emerging Technologies and Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 642-646, May.
    12. de Jong, Jeroen P.J. & Ben-Menahem, Shiko M. & Franke, Nikolaus & Füller, Johann & von Krogh, Georg, 2021. "Treading new ground in household sector innovation research: Scope, emergence, business implications, and diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(8).
    13. Felipe A. Csaszar & Harsh Ketkar & Hyunjin Kim, 2024. "Artificial Intelligence and Strategic Decision-Making: Evidence from Entrepreneurs and Investors," Strategy Science, INFORMS, vol. 9(4), pages 322-345, December.
    14. Olive, Mattia Vincenzo & Gastaldi, Luca & Appio, Francesco Paolo, 2026. "Relational coordination in medical work: The role of digital health practices," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    15. Becker, Markus C. & Rullani, Francesco & Zirpoli, Francesco, 2021. "The role of digital artefacts in early stages of distributed innovation processes," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(10).
    16. Metz, Ashley & Hartley, Paul, 2020. "Scenario development as valuation: Opportunities for reflexivity," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    17. Shirish Sundaresan & Isin Guler, 2025. "Algorithmic Recommendation Tools and Experiential Learning in Clinical Care," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 36(5), pages 1786-1802, September.
    18. Orlikowski, Wanda J. & Scott, Susan V., 2023. "The digital undertow and institutional displacement: a sociomaterial approach," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 119271, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    19. Zhao, Jie & Syed, Tahir Abbas, 2026. "Making sense of algorithms: Workers' coping strategies for algorithmic management on digital platforms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    20. Dahlander, Linus & Beretta, Michela & Thomas, Arne & Kazemi, Shahab & Fenger, Morten H.J. & Frederiksen, Lars, 2023. "Weeding out or picking winners in open innovation? Factors driving multi-stage crowd selection on LEGO ideas," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(10).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.