IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ororsc/v33y2022i1p1-18.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

We Are All Theorists of Technology Now: A Relational Perspective on Emerging Technology and Organizing

Author

Listed:
  • Diane E. Bailey

    (Department of Communication, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850)

  • Samer Faraj

    (Desautels Faculty of Management, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 0G4, Canada)

  • Pamela J. Hinds

    (Department of Management Science & Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Paul M. Leonardi

    (Technology Management Program, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106)

  • Georg von Krogh

    (Department of Management, Technology, and Economics, ETH Zürich, 8092 Zürich, Switzerland)

Abstract

Technologies are changing at a rapid pace and in unpredictable ways. The scale of their impact is also far-reaching. Technologies such as artificial intelligence, data analytics, robotics, digital platforms, social media, blockchain, and 3-D printing affect many parts of the organization simultaneously, enabling new interdependencies within and between units and with actors that many organizations have typically considered to be outside their boundaries. Consequently, today’s emerging technologies have the potential to fundamentally shape all aspects of organizing. This article introduces the special issue “Emerging Technologies and Organizing.” We treat these new technologies as “emerging” because their uses and effects are still varied and have yet to stabilize around a recognizable set of patterns and because the technologies themselves are, by design, always changing and adapting. To theorize the relationship between emerging technologies and organizing, we draw on relational thinking in philosophy and sociology to develop a relational perspective on emerging technologies. Our goal in doing so is to create a new way for organizational scholars to incorporate the ever-increasing role of technology in their theorizing of key organizational processes and phenomena. By developing a relational perspective that treats emerging technologies not as stable entities, but as a set of evolving relations, we provide a novel way for organizational scholars to account for the role of technology in their topics of interest. We sketch the outlines of this relational perspective on emerging technologies and discuss the implications it has for what organizational scholars study and how we study it.

Suggested Citation

  • Diane E. Bailey & Samer Faraj & Pamela J. Hinds & Paul M. Leonardi & Georg von Krogh, 2022. "We Are All Theorists of Technology Now: A Relational Perspective on Emerging Technology and Organizing," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 33(1), pages 1-18, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:1-18
    DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2021.1562
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1562
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/orsc.2021.1562?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wang, Kui & He, Junjia & Zhang, Xiaodan & Xiang, Diandian & Zhang, Ping, 2025. "Unraveling the performance puzzle of digital transformation: The moderating role of TMT heterogeneity and faultline strength," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Li, Guoxiang & Wen, Huan & Sun, Qian & Xue, Jinjun, 2025. "The role of the digital economy in promoting energy justice: Evidence from procedural justice and restorative justice," China Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    3. Patrick Nicolas Tinguely & Junghyun Lee & Vivianna Fang He, 2023. "Designing human resource management systems in the age of AI," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 12(4), pages 263-269, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:33:y:2022:i:1:p:1-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.