IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/oropre/v63y2015i6p1528-1546.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Active Postmarketing Drug Surveillance for Multiple Adverse Events

Author

Listed:
  • Joel Goh

    (Harvard Business School, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02163)

  • Margrét V. Bjarnadóttir

    (Robert H. Smith School of Business, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742)

  • Mohsen Bayati

    (Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

  • Stefanos A. Zenios

    (Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305)

Abstract

Postmarketing drug surveillance is the process of monitoring the adverse events of pharmaceutical or medical devices after they are approved by the appropriate regulatory authorities. Historically, such surveillance was based on voluntary reports by medical practitioners, but with the widespread adoption of electronic medical records and comprehensive patient databases, surveillance systems that utilize such data are of considerable interest. Unfortunately, existing methods for analyzing the data in such systems ignore the open-ended exploratory nature of such systems that requires the assessment of multiple possible adverse events. In this article, we propose a method, SEQMEDS, that assesses the effect of a single drug on multiple adverse events by analyzing data that accumulate sequentially and explicitly captures interdependencies among the multiple events. The method continuously monitors a vector-valued test-statistic derived from the cumulative number of adverse events. It flags a potential adverse event once the test-statistic crosses a stopping boundary. We employ asymptotic analysis that assumes a large number of observations in a given window of time to show how to compute the stopping boundary by solving a convex optimization problem that achieves a desired Type I error and minimizes the expected time to detection under a pre-specified alternative hypothesis. We apply our method to a model in which the interdependency among the multiple adverse events is captured by a Cox proportional hazards model with time-dependent covariates and demonstrate that it provides an approximation of a fully sequential test for the maximum hazard ratio of the drug over multiple adverse events. A numerical study verifies that our method delivers Type I /II errors that are below pre-specified levels and is robust to distributional assumptions and parameter values.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel Goh & Margrét V. Bjarnadóttir & Mohsen Bayati & Stefanos A. Zenios, 2015. "Active Postmarketing Drug Surveillance for Multiple Adverse Events," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 63(6), pages 1528-1546, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:63:y:2015:i:6:p:1528-1546
    DOI: 10.1287/opre.2015.1435
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/opre.2015.1435
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/opre.2015.1435?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stephen G. Eick & William A. Massey & Ward Whitt, 1993. "The Physics of the Mt/G/∞ Queue," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(4), pages 731-742, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tinglong Dai & Sridhar Tayur, 2020. "OM Forum—Healthcare Operations Management: A Snapshot of Emerging Research," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 22(5), pages 869-887, September.
    2. Vishal Ahuja & Carlos A. Alvarez & John R. Birge & Chad Syverson, 2021. "Enhancing Regulatory Decision Making for Postmarket Drug Safety," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(12), pages 7493-7510, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Galit B. Yom-Tov & Anat Rafaeli, 2022. "Integrating emotional load into service operations," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 100(3), pages 565-567, April.
    2. Niyirora, Jerome & Zhuang, Jun, 2017. "Fluid approximations and control of queues in emergency departments," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1110-1124.
    3. Sophia Novitzky & Jamol Pender & Richard H. Rand & Elizabeth Wesson, 2020. "Limiting the oscillations in queues with delayed information through a novel type of delay announcement," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 95(3), pages 281-330, August.
    4. Cerqueti, Roy & Fenga, Livio & Ventura, Marco, 2018. "Does the U.S. exercise contagion on Italy? A theoretical model and empirical evidence," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 499(C), pages 436-442.
    5. D Worthington, 2009. "Reflections on queue modelling from the last 50 years," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(1), pages 83-92, May.
    6. Santiago R. Balseiro & Omar Besbes & Gabriel Y. Weintraub, 2015. "Repeated Auctions with Budgets in Ad Exchanges: Approximations and Design," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(4), pages 864-884, April.
    7. Li, Dongmin & Hu, Qingpei & Wang, Lujia & Yu, Dan, 2019. "Statistical inference for Mt/G/Infinity queueing systems under incomplete observations," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 882-901.
    8. Yong-Hong Kuo & Omar Rado & Benedetta Lupia & Janny M. Y. Leung & Colin A. Graham, 2016. "Improving the efficiency of a hospital emergency department: a simulation study with indirectly imputed service-time distributions," Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, Springer, vol. 28(1), pages 120-147, June.
    9. Jerome Niyirora & Jamol Pender, 2016. "Optimal staffing in nonstationary service centers with constraints," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 63(8), pages 615-630, December.
    10. Hongyuan Lu & Guodong Pang, 2016. "Gaussian Limits for a Fork-Join Network with Nonexchangeable Synchronization in Heavy Traffic," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 41(2), pages 560-595, May.
    11. Andrew M. Ross, 2009. "Distribution sensitivity in a highway flow model," Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(6), pages 769-786, November.
    12. Wang, Haiyan & Olsen, Tava Lennon & Liu, Guiqing, 2018. "Service capacity competition with peak arrivals and delay sensitive customers," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 80-95.
    13. William A. Massey & Jamol Pender, 2018. "Dynamic rate Erlang-A queues," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 89(1), pages 127-164, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:oropre:v:63:y:2015:i:6:p:1528-1546. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.