IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v28y2026i2p479-495.html

Batching and Greedy Policies: How Good Are They in Dynamic Matching?

Author

Listed:
  • Myungeun Eom

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

  • Alejandro Toriello

    (H. Milton Stewart School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332)

Abstract

Problem definition : We study a dynamic nonbipartite stochastic matching problem, where nodes appear following a type-specific independent distribution and wait in the system for a given sojourn time. This problem is motivated by applications in ride-sharing and freight transportation marketplaces and is related to other on-demand marketplaces. Methodology/results : We study the asymptotic properties of two widely used policies, batching and greedy, by analyzing a single-pair case and then converting to the general counterpart using a fluid relaxation and randomization. Finally, we present a computational study simulating freight transportation and ride-sharing marketplaces to assess the empirical effectiveness of the policies. We show that the batching policy is asymptotically optimal with respect to the sojourn time; similarly, although a straightforward greedy policy may not be optimal, a greedy policy with randomized modifications is asymptotically optimal. Perhaps more practically relevant, both policies converge exponentially fast to approximate optimality. We also extend our model to an impatient setting in which each unmatched node leaves at the end of each period with a type-dependent probability. We show that the results for the two policies still hold under different assumptions about the nodes’ patience; roughly speaking, the batching policy requires more patient nodes than the greedy policy to remain optimal. Managerial implications : Our results suggest that managers can achieve near-optimal performance by using simple greedy or batching policies, with only a reasonably small maximum waiting time guarantee, and even in the presence of potentially impatient nodes.

Suggested Citation

  • Myungeun Eom & Alejandro Toriello, 2026. "Batching and Greedy Policies: How Good Are They in Dynamic Matching?," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 479-495, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:28:y:2026:i:2:p:479-495
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2024.1074
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2024.1074
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2024.1074?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ilan Lobel & Sébastien Martin, 2025. "Detours in Shared Rides," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(2), pages 1716-1736, February.
    2. Patrick Jaillet & Xin Lu, 2014. "Online Stochastic Matching: New Algorithms with Better Bounds," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 39(3), pages 624-646, August.
    3. Chiwei Yan & Helin Zhu & Nikita Korolko & Dawn Woodard, 2020. "Dynamic pricing and matching in ride‐hailing platforms," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 67(8), pages 705-724, December.
    4. Jose H. Blanchet & Martin I. Reiman & Virag Shah & Lawrence M. Wein & Linjia Wu, 2022. "Asymptotically Optimal Control of a Centralized Dynamic Matching Market with General Utilities," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(6), pages 3355-3370, November.
    5. Francisco Castro & Hamid Nazerzadeh & Chiwei Yan, 2020. "Matching queues with reneging: a product form solution," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 96(3), pages 359-385, December.
    6. Ross Anderson & Itai Ashlagi & David Gamarnik & Yash Kanoria, 2017. "Efficient Dynamic Barter Exchange," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1446-1459, December.
    7. Süleyman Kerimov & Itai Ashlagi & Itai Gurvich, 2024. "Dynamic Matching: Characterizing and Achieving Constant Regret," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2799-2822, May.
    8. Süleyman Kerimov & Itai Ashlagi & Itai Gurvich, 2025. "On the Optimality of Greedy Policies in Dynamic Matching," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 560-582, January.
    9. Guiyun Feng & Guangwen Kong & Zizhuo Wang, 2021. "We Are on the Way: Analysis of On-Demand Ride-Hailing Systems," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(5), pages 1237-1256, September.
    10. Varun Gupta, 2024. "Technical Note—Greedy Algorithm for Multiway Matching with Bounded Regret," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 72(3), pages 1139-1155, May.
    11. Tomer Ezra & Michal Feldman & Nick Gravin & Zhihao Gavin Tang, 2022. "Prophet Matching with General Arrivals," Mathematics of Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(2), pages 878-898, May.
    12. Angelos Aveklouris & Amber L. Puha & Amy R. Ward, 2024. "A fluid approximation for a matching model with general reneging distributions," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 199-238, April.
    13. Mohammadreza Nazari & Alexander L. Stolyar, 2019. "Reward maximization in general dynamic matching systems," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 91(1), pages 143-170, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Süleyman Kerimov & Itai Ashlagi & Itai Gurvich, 2025. "On the Optimality of Greedy Policies in Dynamic Matching," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 560-582, January.
    2. Guodong Lyu & Wang Chi Cheung & Chung-Piaw Teo & Hai Wang, 2024. "Multiobjective Stochastic Optimization: A Case of Real-Time Matching in Ride-Sourcing Markets," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 500-518, March.
    3. Martin Zubeldia & Prakirt R. Jhunjhunwala & Siva Theja Maguluri, 2026. "Matching Queues with Abandonments in Quantum Switches: Stability and Throughput Analysis," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(1), pages 339-355, January.
    4. Shuzhen Chen & Opher Baron & Ningyuan Chen, 2025. "Optimal Dynamic Clearing for Interbank Payments," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 71(4), pages 2953-2974, April.
    5. Zihao Li & Hao Wang & Zhenzhen Yan, 2026. "Fully Online Matching with General Stochastic Arrivals and Departures," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(2), pages 752-769, March.
    6. Ausseil, Rosemonde & Ulmer, Marlin W. & Pazour, Jennifer A., 2024. "Online acceptance probability approximation in peer-to-peer transportation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 123(C).
    7. Dongling Rong & Xinyu Sun & Meilin Zhang & Shuangchi He, 2025. "Satisficing Approach to On-Demand Ride Matching," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 413-427, March.
    8. Danny Segev, 2025. "Near-Optimal Adaptive Policies for Serving Stochastically Departing Customers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(5), pages 2744-2760, September.
    9. Li, Yanni & Gao, Yinshi & He, Zhou, 2025. "Vertical and horizontal fairness concerns in the ride-hailing platform with solo and carpool ride services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    10. Zhang, Kenan & Alonso-Mora, Javier & Fielbaum, Andres, 2025. "What do walking and e-hailing bring to scale economies in on-demand mobility?," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Saeed Alaei & Ali Makhdoumi & Azarakhsh Malekian, 2025. "Revenue Maximization Under Unknown Private Values with Nonobligatory Inspection," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(3), pages 1307-1319, May.
    12. Jiayang Li & Guoyin Zhang & Debing Ni, 2025. "Drivers’ Welfare and Pollutant Emission Induced by Ride-Hailing Platforms’ Pricing Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-35, April.
    13. Mingwei Yang & Sophie H. Yu, 2026. "Online Metric Matching: Beyond the Worst Case," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(1), pages 130-140, January.
    14. Angelos Aveklouris & Levi DeValve & Maximiliano Stock & Amy Ward, 2025. "Matching Impatient and Heterogeneous Demand and Supply," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(3), pages 1637-1658, May.
    15. René Caldentey & Lisa Aoki Hillas & Varun Gupta, 2025. "Designing Service Menus for Bipartite Queueing Systems," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(3), pages 1496-1534, May.
    16. Bowen Xie, 2024. "Multi-component matching queues in heavy traffic," Queueing Systems: Theory and Applications, Springer, vol. 106(3), pages 285-331, April.
    17. Fan Gao & Jingjing Hao & Zhitao Li & Chunyang Han & Jinjun Tang & Chuyun Zhao, 2026. "Understanding inequality in ride-hailing service: an investigation of matching and pickup time," Transportation, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 229-256, February.
    18. Ali Aouad & Ömer Sarıtaç, 2022. "Dynamic Stochastic Matching Under Limited Time," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 70(4), pages 2349-2383, July.
    19. Süleyman Kerimov & Itai Ashlagi & Itai Gurvich, 2024. "Dynamic Matching: Characterizing and Achieving Constant Regret," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 70(5), pages 2799-2822, May.
    20. Zhu, Donghao & Minner, Stefan & Bichler, Martin, 2025. "Pricing policy and queue-length disclosure in on-demand service platforms," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:28:y:2026:i:2:p:479-495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.