IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormsom/v23y2021i4p854-875.html

Do Customer Emotions Affect Agent Speed? An Empirical Study of Emotional Load in Online Customer Contact Centers

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Altman

    (The William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, 3200003 Haifa, Israel)

  • Galit B. Yom-Tov

    (The William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, 3200003 Haifa, Israel)

  • Marcelo Olivares

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Instituto Sistemas Complejos de Ingenieria, University of Chile, 58149 Santiago, Chile)

  • Shelly Ashtar

    (The William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, 3200003 Haifa, Israel)

  • Anat Rafaeli

    (The William Davidson Faculty of Industrial Engineering and Management, Technion—Israel Institute of Technology, 3200003 Haifa, Israel)

Abstract

Problem definition : Research in operations management has focused mainly on system-level load, ignoring the fact that service agents and customers express a variety of emotions that may impact service processes and outcomes. We introduce the concept of emotional load —the emotional demands that customer behaviors impose on service agents—to analyze how customer emotions affect service worker’s behavior. Academic/practical relevance : Most theories in organizational behavior literature predict that emotions expressed by customers reduce agent’s cognitive abilities and therefore, should reduce the agent’s speed (e.g., by increasing the service time required to serve an angry customer). We aim to shed light on the magnitude of that phenomenon while addressing important econometric challenges. We also investigate an important mechanism that drives this relation, namely agent effort. We discuss practical opportunities that arise from measuring emotional load and how it can be used to enhance productivity. Methodology : We measure the emotional load of agents using sentiment analysis tools that quantify positive/negative customer emotion expressions in an online chat-type contact center and link it to agent behavior: response time (RT) and the length and number of messages required to complete a service request. Identifying a causal effect of customer emotion on agent behavior using observational data is challenging because there are confounding factors associated with the complexity of service requests, which are related to both customer emotions and agent behavior. Our identification strategy uses panel data and exploits the variation across messages within a focal request using fixed effects to control for unobserved factors associated with case complexity. Instrumental variables are also used to address issues of measurement error and other endogeneity problems; the instruments are based on exogenous shocks to agent performance indicators that have been studied in the service operations literature. Results : Analyses show that emotional load created by negative customer emotions increases agent RT, the length of the agent messages (a measure of effort), and the required number of messages needed to complete a service request. Emotional load and agent RT reciprocally affect each other, with long agent RTs and a high number of messages producing more negative customer emotion. Managerial implications : We suggest that the emotional content in customer communications should be an important factor to consider when assigning workload to agents in a service system. Our study provides a rigorous methodology to measure the emotional content from customer text messages and objectively evaluate its associated workload. We discuss how this can be used to improve staffing decisions and dynamic workload routing through real-time monitoring of emotional load.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Altman & Galit B. Yom-Tov & Marcelo Olivares & Shelly Ashtar & Anat Rafaeli, 2021. "Do Customer Emotions Affect Agent Speed? An Empirical Study of Emotional Load in Online Customer Contact Centers," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 854-875, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:4:p:854-875
    DOI: 10.1287/msom.2020.0897
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/msom.2020.0897
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/msom.2020.0897?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paulo B. Goes & Noyan Ilk & Mingfeng Lin & J. Leon Zhao, 2018. "When More Is Less: Field Evidence on Unintended Consequences of Multitasking," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 64(7), pages 3033-3054, July.
    2. Yichuan Ding & Eric Park & Mahesh Nagarajan & Eric Grafstein, 2019. "Patient Prioritization in Emergency Department Triage Systems: An Empirical Study of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS)," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 723-741, October.
    3. Tom Fangyun Tan & Serguei Netessine, 2014. "When Does the Devil Make Work? An Empirical Study of the Impact of Workload on Worker Productivity," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(6), pages 1574-1593, June.
    4. Charles F. Manski, 1993. "Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 60(3), pages 531-542.
    5. Hummy Song & Anita L. Tucker & Karen L. Murrell, 2015. "The Diseconomies of Queue Pooling: An Empirical Investigation of Emergency Department Length of Stay," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(12), pages 3032-3053, December.
    6. Delasay, Mohammad & Ingolfsson, Armann & Kolfal, Bora & Schultz, Kenneth, 2019. "Load effect on service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 673-686.
    7. Richard C. Larson, 1987. "OR Forum—Perspectives on Queues: Social Justice and the Psychology of Queueing," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 895-905, December.
    8. Mohr, Lois A. & Bitner, Mary Jo, 1995. "The role of employee effort in satisfaction with service transactions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 32(3), pages 239-252, March.
    9. David D. Cho & Kurt M. Bretthauer & Kyle D. Cattani & Alex F. Mills, 2019. "Behavior Aware Service Staffing," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 28(5), pages 1285-1304, May.
    10. Avishai Mandelbaum & Petar Momčilović & Yulia Tseytlin, 2012. "On Fair Routing from Emergency Departments to Hospital Wards: QED Queues with Heterogeneous Servers," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 58(7), pages 1273-1291, July.
    11. Diwas S. Kc & Christian Terwiesch, 2009. "Impact of Workload on Service Time and Patient Safety: An Econometric Analysis of Hospital Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 55(9), pages 1486-1498, September.
    12. Krishnan S. Anand & M. Faz{i}l Paç & Senthil Veeraraghavan, 2011. "Quality-Speed Conundrum: Trade-offs in Customer-Intensive Services," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(1), pages 40-56, January.
    13. Tiedens, Larissa Z., 2001. "Anger and Advancement versus Sadness and Subjugation: The Effect of Negative Emotion Expressions on Social Status Conferral," Research Papers 1615, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Naumov, Sergey & Oliva, Rogelio, 2025. "Structural feedback and behavioral decision making in queuing systems: A hybrid simulation framework," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 324(3), pages 855-870.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhongbin Wang & Luyi Yang & Shiliang Cui & Sezer Ülkü & Yong-Pin Zhou, 2023. "Pooling Agents for Customer-Intensive Services," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 860-875, May.
    2. Tom F. Tan & Bradley R. Staats, 2020. "Behavioral Drivers of Routing Decisions: Evidence from Restaurant Table Assignment," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 29(4), pages 1050-1070, April.
    3. Sezer Ülkü & Chris Hydock & Shiliang Cui, 2022. "Social Queues (Cues): Impact of Others’ Waiting in Line on One’s Service Time," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(11), pages 7958-7976, November.
    4. Hao Ding & Sokol Tushe & Diwas Singh KC & Donald K. K. Lee, 2024. "Frontiers in Operations: Valuing Nursing Productivity in Emergency Departments," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 1323-1337, July.
    5. Shuai Hao & Zhankun Sun & Yuqian Xu, 2025. "Emergency Care Efficiency vs. Quality: Uncovering Hidden Consequences of Fast-Track Routing Decisions," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 75-93, January.
    6. Lesley Meng & Robert J. Batt & Christian Terwiesch, 2021. "The Impact of Facility Layout on Service Worker Behavior: An Empirical Study of Nurses in the Emergency Department," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 819-834, July.
    7. Robert J. Batt & Christian Terwiesch, 2017. "Early Task Initiation and Other Load-Adaptive Mechanisms in the Emergency Department," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(11), pages 3531-3551, November.
    8. Hummy Song & Mor Armony & Guillaume Roels, 2024. "Queue Configurations and Operational Performance: An Interplay Between Customer Ownership and Queue Length Awareness," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 2284-2304, November.
    9. Diwas S. KC & Bradley R. Staats & Maryam Kouchaki & Francesca Gino, 2020. "Task Selection and Workload: A Focus on Completing Easy Tasks Hurts Performance," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(10), pages 4397-4416, October.
    10. Jim G. Dai & Pengyi Shi, 2021. "Recent Modeling and Analytical Advances in Hospital Inpatient Flow Management," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 30(6), pages 1838-1862, June.
    11. Mohamad Soltani & Robert J. Batt & Hessam Bavafa & Brian W. Patterson, 2022. "Does What Happens in the ED Stay in the ED? The Effects of Emergency Department Physician Workload on Post-ED Care Use," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 24(6), pages 3079-3098, November.
    12. Ahmad M. Ashkanani & Benjamin B. Dunford & Kevin J. Mumford, 2022. "Impact of Motivation and Workload on Service Time Components: An Empirical Analysis of Call Center Operations," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(9), pages 6697-6715, September.
    13. Song-Hee Kim & Hummy Song & Melissa A. Valentine, 2023. "Learning in Temporary Teams: The Varying Effects of Partner Exposure by Team Member Role," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 433-455, January.
    14. Yueyang Zhong & Ragavendran Gopalakrishnan & Amy R. Ward, 2025. "Behavior-Aware Queueing: The Finite-Buffer Setting with Many Strategic Servers," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 73(1), pages 290-310, January.
    15. Ryan W. Buell & Michael I. Norton, 2011. "The Labor Illusion: How Operational Transparency Increases Perceived Value," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 57(9), pages 1564-1579, February.
    16. Delasay, Mohammad & Ingolfsson, Armann & Kolfal, Bora & Schultz, Kenneth, 2019. "Load effect on service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(3), pages 673-686.
    17. Smirnov, Dmitry & Huchzermeier, Arnd, 2020. "Analytics for labor planning in systems with load-dependent service times," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(2), pages 668-681.
    18. Robert J. Niewoehner & KC Diwas & Bradley Staats, 2023. "Physician Discretion and Patient Pick-up: How Familiarity Encourages Multitasking in the Emergency Department," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 71(3), pages 958-978, May.
    19. Büşra Ergün‐Şahin & Evrim Didem Güneş & Ayşe Kocabıyıkoğlu & Ahmet Keskin, 2022. "How does workload affect test ordering behavior of physicians? An empirical investigation," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 31(6), pages 2664-2680, June.
    20. Michael Freeman & Nicos Savva & Stefan Scholtes, 2017. "Gatekeepers at Work: An Empirical Analysis of a Maternity Unit," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(10), pages 3147-3167, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormsom:v:23:y:2021:i:4:p:854-875. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.