IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v27y1981i3p260-267.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparison among Certain Inspection Policies

Author

Listed:
  • A. G. Munford

    (University of Exeter, England)

Abstract

Certain continuous production processes and early warning systems must be inspected in order to detect failures that would otherwise not be apparent. An optimal inspection policy is a sequence of inspection times which minimizes the average cost per inspection cycle relative to some cost model. Under both an existing cost model, and a new cost model proposed in this paper, the computation of such policies is difficult. Three sub-optimal inspection policies are proposed, each, like the optimal policy, having decreasing times between successive inspections when the time to system failure has increasing hazard rate. Numerical comparisons are given for both cost models in the case of Weibull failure times.

Suggested Citation

  • A. G. Munford, 1981. "Comparison among Certain Inspection Policies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 260-267, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:27:y:1981:i:3:p:260-267
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.27.3.260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.27.3.260
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.27.3.260?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. M Hariga & N Azaiez, 2006. "Heuristic procedures for the single facility inspection problem with minimal repair and increasing failure rate," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 57(9), pages 1081-1088, September.
    2. Panagiotidou, S. & Tagaras, G., 2012. "Optimal integrated process control and maintenance under general deterioration," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 58-70.
    3. Chakraborty, Tulika & Giri, B.C. & Chaudhuri, K.S., 2009. "Production lot sizing with process deterioration and machine breakdown under inspection schedule," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 257-271, April.
    4. Anthony Rossiter & Susan M Hester, 2017. "Designing Biosecurity Inspection Regimes to Account for Stakeholder Incentives: An Inspection Game Approach," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 93(301), pages 277-301, June.
    5. Giri, B.C. & Dohi, T., 2007. "Inspection scheduling for imperfect production processes under free repair warranty contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 183(1), pages 238-252, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:27:y:1981:i:3:p:260-267. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.