IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormnsc/v26y1980i1p1-17.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Worst-Case Analysis of Heuristic Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Marshall L. Fisher

    (University of Pennsylvania)

Abstract

The increased focus on heuristics for the approximate solution of integer programs has led to more sophisticated analysis methods for studying their performance. This paper is concerned with the worst-case approach to the analysis of heuristic performance. A worst-case study establishes the maximum deviation from optimality that can occur when a specified heuristic is applied within a given problem class. This is an important piece of information that can be combined with empirical testing and other analyses to provide a more complete evaluation of a heuristic. In this paper the basic ground rules of worst-case analysis of heuristics are reviewed, and a large variety of the existing types of worst-case results are described in terms of the knapsack problem. A selected sample of results for four other problems is given. The paper concludes with a discussion of possibilities for further research.

Suggested Citation

  • Marshall L. Fisher, 1980. "Worst-Case Analysis of Heuristic Algorithms," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(1), pages 1-17, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:26:y:1980:i:1:p:1-17
    DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.26.1.1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.26.1.1
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mnsc.26.1.1?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kwon, Roy H., 2005. "Data dependent worst case bounds for weighted set packing," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 68-76, November.
    2. Nicholas G. Hall, 1989. "The inventory packing problem," Naval Research Logistics (NRL), John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 399-418, August.
    3. Sharma, R.R.K. & Berry, V., 2007. "Developing new formulations and relaxations of single stage capacitated warehouse location problem (SSCWLP): Empirical investigation for assessing relative strengths and computational effort," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 803-812, March.
    4. Safer, Hershel M. & Orlin, James B., 1953-, 1995. "Fast approximation schemes for multi-criteria combinatorial optimization," Working papers 3756-95., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    5. Hauser, John R. & Urban, Glen L. & Weinberg, Bruce D., 1992. "Time flies when you're having fun : how consumers allocate their time when evaluating products," Working papers 3439-92., Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Sloan School of Management.
    6. Nicholas G. Hall & Marc E. Posner, 2001. "Generating Experimental Data for Computational Testing with Machine Scheduling Applications," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(6), pages 854-865, December.
    7. Freville, Arnaud, 2004. "The multidimensional 0-1 knapsack problem: An overview," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(1), pages 1-21, May.
    8. E A Silver, 2004. "An overview of heuristic solution methods," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(9), pages 936-956, September.
    9. Kohli, Rajeev & Krishnamurti, Ramesh & Mirchandani, Prakash, 2004. "Average performance of greedy heuristics for the integer knapsack problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 154(1), pages 36-45, April.
    10. Tzafestas, Spyros & Triantafyllakis, Alekos, 1993. "Deterministic scheduling in computing and manufacturing systems: a survey of models and algorithms," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 397-434.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:26:y:1980:i:1:p:1-17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.