IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/ormksc/v12y1993i3p270-279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testing Predicted Choices Against Observations in Probabilistic Discrete-Choice Models

Author

Listed:
  • Joel L. Horowitz

    (University of Iowa)

  • Jordan J. Louviere

    (University of Utah)

Abstract

Probabilistic discrete-choice models, such as multinomial logit models, are widely used to predict changes in market shares or total demand resulting from changes in policy variables under management control. These models often are evaluated in terms of their ability to predict choices in a holdout sample. This paper presents a new test for comparing predicted and observed choices. The results of a Monte Carlo experiment indicate that the new test has good finite-sample properties and high power in several circumstances likely to arise frequently in applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Joel L. Horowitz & Jordan J. Louviere, 1993. "Testing Predicted Choices Against Observations in Probabilistic Discrete-Choice Models," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 12(3), pages 270-279.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:12:y:1993:i:3:p:270-279
    DOI: 10.1287/mksc.12.3.270
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mksc.12.3.270
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/mksc.12.3.270?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Manrai, Ajay K., 1995. "Mathematical models of brand choice behavior," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(1), pages 1-17, April.
    2. Horowitz, Joel & Keane, Michael & Bolduc, Denis & Divakar, Suresh & Geweke, John & Gonul, Fosun & Hajivassiliou, Vassilis & Koppelman, Frank & Matzkin, Rosa & Rossi, Peter & Ruud, Paul, 1994. "Advances in Random Utility Models," MPRA Paper 53026, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Poudel, Rajendra & Collins, Alan & Gazal, Kathryn & Wang, Jingxin, 2020. "Benefit transfer estimation of willingness-to-pay for U.S. wetlands conservation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    4. Ram Shrestha & John Loomis, 2003. "Meta-Analytic Benefit Transfer of Outdoor Recreation Economic Values: Testing Out-of-Sample Convergent Validity," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 25(1), pages 79-100, May.
    5. Kamolthip, Sarun & Seenprachawong, Udomsak, 2016. "Validity of Internet-based Stated Preference Data in Modeling Waterfall Recreation Site Choice," Asian Journal of Applied Economics, Kasetsart University, Center for Applied Economics Research, vol. 23(2), December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:ormksc:v:12:y:1993:i:3:p:270-279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.