IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v38y2008i2p112-122.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Setting Safety-Stock Targets at Intel in the Presence of Forecast Bias

Author

Listed:
  • Matthew P. Manary

    (Supply Chain Network Group, Intel Corporation, Hillsboro, Oregon 97124)

  • Sean P. Willems

    (School of Management, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215)

Abstract

Inventory target setting within Intel's embedded devices group historically consisted of management-determined inventory targets that were uniformly applied across product families. Achieving and maintaining these inventory targets at the individual product level proved to be a difficult task. To better align inventory resources and improve customer-service levels, Intel employed a multiechelon inventory optimization (MEIO) model to set inventory targets. However, the company could not implement the model's initial recommendations because of the presence of bias in the sales forecast data. Managing the forecast bias by directly modifying the raw sales forecast data was not an option because Sales and Marketing controlled and loaded the data into the manufacturing resource planning (MRP) system before the planning organization received it. Therefore, the average forecast demand, with its bias present, was already in the system; the only adjustment that the planning organization could make was to change the inventory target. This paper describes the inventory optimization problem in Intel's embedded devices group and the adjustment procedure that we developed to produce appropriate inventory targets in the presence of forecast bias.

Suggested Citation

  • Matthew P. Manary & Sean P. Willems, 2008. "Setting Safety-Stock Targets at Intel in the Presence of Forecast Bias," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 112-122, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:38:y:2008:i:2:p:112-122
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1070.0339
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1070.0339
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1070.0339?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Steffen T. Klosterhalfen & Stefan Minner & Sean P. Willems, 2014. "Strategic Safety Stock Placement in Supply Networks with Static Dual Supply," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 16(2), pages 204-219, May.
    2. Saoud, Patrick & Kourentzes, Nikolaos & Boylan, John E., 2022. "Approximations for the Lead Time Variance: a Forecasting and Inventory Evaluation," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    3. Matthew P. Manary & Brian Wieland & Sean P. Willems & Karl G. Kempf, 2019. "Analytics Makes Inventory Planning a Lights-Out Activity at Intel Corporation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 49(1), pages 52-63, January.
    4. Trapero, Juan R. & Cardós, Manuel & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2019. "Quantile forecast optimal combination to enhance safety stock estimation," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 239-250.
    5. Matthew P. Manary & Sean P. Willems & Alison F. Shihata, 2009. "Correcting Heterogeneous and Biased Forecast Error at Intel for Supply Chain Optimization," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(5), pages 415-427, October.
    6. Barros, Júlio & Cortez, Paulo & Carvalho, M. Sameiro, 2021. "A systematic literature review about dimensioning safety stock under uncertainties and risks in the procurement process," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 8(C).
    7. Trapero, Juan R. & Cardós, Manuel & Kourentzes, Nikolaos, 2019. "Empirical safety stock estimation based on kernel and GARCH models," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 199-211.
    8. Lee, Yun Shin, 2014. "A semi-parametric approach for estimating critical fractiles under autocorrelated demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(1), pages 163-173.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:38:y:2008:i:2:p:112-122. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.