IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v35y2005i2p154-163.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Elements of a Theory of the Practice of Operations Research: A Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Frederic H. Murphy

    (Fox School of Business and Management, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19122)

Abstract

The ultimate value of operations research (OR) is making real differences in organizations. Yet little has been written on how one becomes good at doing OR and successful in practice. I propose a framework for understanding what makes good practice and an expert practitioner that encompasses the technical skills required to do OR through the managerial and marketing skills necessary to run an OR enterprise. The potential for success with OR methods depends on the nature of the problem, whether the initial and goal states are well defined or ill defined. The tools of artificial intelligence are useful for organizing the expertise in being a successful practitioner.

Suggested Citation

  • Frederic H. Murphy, 2005. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Elements of a Theory of the Practice of Operations Research: A Framework," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 154-163, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:35:y:2005:i:2:p:154-163
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.1050.0126
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.1050.0126
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.1050.0126?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andrew P. Armacost & Cynthia Barnhart & Keith A. Ware & Alysia M. Wilson, 2004. "UPS Optimizes Its Air Network," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 15-25, February.
    2. Gerald F. Smith, 1989. "Defining Managerial Problems: A Framework for Prescriptive Theorizing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 963-981, August.
    3. Miser, Hugh J., 1993. "A foundational concept of science appropriate for validation in operational research," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 204-215, April.
    4. Scott Andrews & Frederic H. Murphy & Xiao Pei Wang & Steve Welch, 1996. "Modeling Crude Oil Lightering in Delaware Bay," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 68-78, December.
    5. R J Ormerod, 2002. "On the nature of OR: taking stock," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 53(5), pages 475-491, May.
    6. Frederic H. Murphy & Venkat Panchanadam, 1999. "Using Analogical Reasoning and Schema Formation to Improve the Success in Formulating Linear Programming Models," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 47(5), pages 663-674, October.
    7. Corbett, Charles J. & Overmeer, Willem J. A. M. & Van Wassenhove, Luk N., 1995. "Strands of practice in OR (the practitioner's dilemma)," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 87(3), pages 484-499, December.
    8. Robert E. D. Woolsey, 1998. "The Fifth Column: On Doing Well by Doing Good and an Offer of Free Education," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 99-103, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Patrick Hew, 2007. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Direct Advisors vs. Tool Developers---Implications for Practice," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(3), pages 279-284, June.
    2. Frederic H. Murphy, 2005. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Elements of a Theory of the Practice of Operations Research: Practice as a Business," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 524-530, December.
    3. R. John Milne & Amy K. Zander, 2012. "Operations Research Capstone Courses for Business Majors with Analytical Backgrounds," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 13(1), pages 2-9, September.
    4. Matthew J. Drake, 2019. "Teaching OR/MS with Cases: A Review and New Suggestions," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 57-66, January.
    5. Merrick, James H. & Weyant, John P., 2019. "On choosing the resolution of normative models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 279(2), pages 511-523.
    6. V J Mabin & J Davies & S Kim, 2009. "Rethinking tradeoffs and OR/MS methodology," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(10), pages 1384-1395, October.
    7. Franco, L. Alberto & Greiffenhagen, Christian, 2018. "Making OR practice visible: Using ethnomethodology to analyse facilitated modelling workshops," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 265(2), pages 673-684.
    8. Frederic H. Murphy, 2005. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Elements of a Theory of the Practice of Operations Research: Expertise in Practice," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 313-322, August.
    9. Paucar-Caceres, Alberto, 2010. "Mapping the changes in management science: A review of 'soft' OR/MS articles published in Omega (1973-2008)," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 46-56, February.
    10. S Robinson, 2007. "PSMs: looking in from the outside," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 58(5), pages 689-691, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Frederic H. Murphy, 2005. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Elements of a Theory of the Practice of Operations Research: Practice as a Business," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(6), pages 524-530, December.
    2. Frederic H. Murphy, 2005. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Elements of a Theory of the Practice of Operations Research: Expertise in Practice," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(4), pages 313-322, August.
    3. Jack R. Meredith, 2001. "Reconsidering the Philosophical Basis of OR/MS," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 49(3), pages 325-333, June.
    4. Ranyard, J.C. & Fildes, R. & Hu, Tun-I, 2015. "Reassessing the scope of OR practice: The Influences of Problem Structuring Methods and the Analytics Movement," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 245(1), pages 1-13.
    5. Phillips, Christina Jane & Nikolopoulos, Konstantinos, 2019. "Forecast quality improvement with Action Research: A success story at PharmaCo," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 129-143.
    6. Lane, David C., 1999. "Social theory and system dynamics practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 501-527, March.
    7. G. Guastaroba & M. G. Speranza & D. Vigo, 2016. "Intermediate Facilities in Freight Transportation Planning: A Survey," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(3), pages 763-789, August.
    8. Oliva, Rogelio, 2003. "Model calibration as a testing strategy for system dynamics models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(3), pages 552-568, December.
    9. Scott P. Stevens & Susan W. Palocsay, 2017. "Teaching Use of Binary Variables in Integer Linear Programs: Formulating Logical Conditions," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 18(1), pages 28-36, September.
    10. Sturm, Timo & Fecho, Mariska & Buxmann, Peter, 2021. "To Use or Not to Use Artificial Intelligence? A Framework for the Ideation and Evaluation of Problems to Be Solved with Artificial Intelligence," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 124702, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    11. C W Olphert & J M Wilson, 2004. "Validation of decision-aiding spreadsheets: the influence of contingency factors," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 55(1), pages 12-22, January.
    12. Ernesto A. Lagarda-Leyva & Alfredo Bueno-Solano & Luis F. Morales-Mendoza, 2022. "System Dynamics and Graphical Interface Modeling of a Fig-Derived Micro-Producer Factory," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-17, October.
    13. R Ormerod, 2005. "Putting soft OR methods to work: the case of IS strategy development for the UK Parliament," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 56(12), pages 1379-1398, December.
    14. Marc NIKITIN, 2013. "Can Aristotle Help Us Specify the Very Nature of Management problem?," LEO Working Papers / DR LEO 2253, Orleans Economics Laboratory / Laboratoire d'Economie d'Orleans (LEO), University of Orleans.
    15. Marc Nikitin, 2014. "Can Aristotle Help Us Specify the Very Nature of Management Problem?," Working Papers halshs-01015082, HAL.
    16. Julie Ann Stuart Williams & Randall Reid & Kristine Gallamore & Maxwell Rankin, 2018. "Introducing Troubleshooting for Model Formulation, Spreadsheet Development, and Memo Communication with Feedforward," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 18(2), pages 102-115, January.
    17. Quesada Pérez, José Miguel & Lange, Jean-Charles & Tancrez, Jean-Sébastien, 2018. "A multi-hub Express Shipment Service Network Design model with flexible hub assignment," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 116-131.
    18. Arnold Reisman & Muhittin Oral, 2005. "Soft Systems Methodology: A Context Within a 50-Year Retrospective of OR/MS," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(2), pages 164-178, April.
    19. Meuffels, W.J.M., 2015. "The design of road and air networks for express service providers," Other publications TiSEM d3266cb8-bc55-41be-adc7-4, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    20. Michael F. Gorman & John-Paul Clarke & Amir Hossein Gharehgozli & Michael Hewitt & René de Koster & Debjit Roy, 2014. "State of the Practice: A Review of the Application of OR/MS in Freight Transportation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 44(6), pages 535-554, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:35:y:2005:i:2:p:154-163. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.