IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orinte/v31y2001i3p66-75.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Modern Simulation Course for Business Students

Author

Listed:
  • H. Brian Hwarng

    (Department of Decision Sciences, National University of Singapore, FBA 1, 15 Law Link, Singapore 117591)

Abstract

Simulation was often neglected in undergraduate business curricula for two reasons: (1) simulation was traditionally taught and used in engineering disciplines, and (2) business students lacked training in computer programming and quantitative skills. Powerful microcomputers and user-friendly simulation software have brought about new prospects for simulation modeling. To meet the needs of the modern business world, business schools should widely teach simulation modeling and analysis. I developed an intermediate simulation course at the National University of Singapore for upper-level-undergraduate or graduate business students. Early in the course, migrating from general-purpose spreadsheet modeling to special-purpose simulation modeling is a key step. Modeling real-world problems through team projects is the climax of the course. My rigorous and practical approach proves that students with no simulation or computer-programming background can handle even an intermediate course.

Suggested Citation

  • H. Brian Hwarng, 2001. "A Modern Simulation Course for Business Students," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 31(3), pages 66-75, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:31:y:2001:i:3:p:66-75
    DOI: 10.1287/inte.31.3.66.9631
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.31.3.66.9631
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/inte.31.3.66.9631?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert R. Trippi, 1996. "The AIM Game: Learning Investment Management Principles through Monte Carlo Simulation," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(3), pages 66-76, June.
    2. Robert L. Carraway & Dana R. Clyman, 1997. "Managerial Relevance: The Key to Survival for OR/MS," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(6), pages 115-130, December.
    3. Wayne L. Winston, 1996. "The Teachers' Forum: Management Science with Spreadsheets for MBAs at Indiana University," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 105-111, April.
    4. Chiang Kao & Quey-Jen Yeh & Yao-Chuan Tsai, 1997. "Teaching Undergraduate Operations Research in Some of the Business Schools in Asia," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(5), pages 93-103, October.
    5. Stephen G. Powell, 1998. "The Teachers' Forum: Requiem for the Management Science Course?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 111-117, April.
    6. Gamini Gunawardane, 1991. "Trends in Teaching Management Science in Undergraduate Business Programs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 21(5), pages 16-21, October.
    7. Stephen G. Powell, 1997. "The Teachers' Forum: From Intelligent Consumer to Active Modeler, Two MBA Success Stories," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 27(3), pages 88-98, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ganesh, Gopala & Paswan, Audhesh K., 2010. "Teaching basic marketing accountability using spreadsheets: An exploratory perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 182-190, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter J. Regan, 2006. "Professional Decision Modeling: Practitioner as Professor," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 142-149, April.
    2. Stewart Robinson & Maureen Meadows & John Mingers & Frances A. O'Brien & Estelle A. Shale & Stephanie Stray, 2003. "Teaching OR/MS to MBAs at Warwick Business School: A Turnaround Story," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 67-76, April.
    3. Kala Chand Seal & Zbigniew H. Przasnyski, 2003. "Using Technology to Support Pedagogy in an OR/MS Course," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(4), pages 27-40, August.
    4. Stephen G. Powell, 1998. "The Teachers' Forum: Requiem for the Management Science Course?," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 111-117, April.
    5. Thomas A. Grossman, 2002. "Student Consulting Projects Benefit Faculty and Industry," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 32(2), pages 42-48, April.
    6. Suzanne de Treville & Ann van Ackere, 2006. "Equipping Students to Reduce Lead Times: The Role of Queuing-Theory-Based Modeling," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 165-173, April.
    7. Matthew J. Drake, 2019. "Teaching OR/MS with Cases: A Review and New Suggestions," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 57-66, January.
    8. M. David Albritton & Patrick R. McMullen & Lorraine R. Gardiner, 2003. "OR/MS Content and Visibility in AACSB-Accredited US Business Programs," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(5), pages 83-89, October.
    9. James Corner & Patricia Doyle Corner, 2003. "Teaching OR/MS Using Discussion Leadership," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 60-69, June.
    10. Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 1999. "The Teachers' Forum: Breaking the Mold—A New Approach to Teaching the First MBA Course in Management Science," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(4), pages 99-116, August.
    11. Allan W. Gray & Joshua D. Detre & Brian C. Briggeman, 2005. "Valuing Limited Information in Decision Making Under Uncertainty," Working Papers 05-02, Purdue University, College of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Economics.
    12. Calvin Sonntag & Thomas A. Grossman, 1999. "End-User Modeling Improves R&D Management at AgrEvo Canada, Inc," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 29(5), pages 132-142, October.
    13. Briggeman, Brian C. & Detre, Joshua D. & Gray, Allan W., 2004. "Compound Options: A Real Options Application To An Agricultural Business," 2004 Annual meeting, August 1-4, Denver, CO 19996, American Agricultural Economics Association (New Name 2008: Agricultural and Applied Economics Association).
    14. Valerie Belton & Helyn Thornbury Gould & John L. Scott, 2006. "Developing the Reflective Practitioner---Designing an Undergraduate Class," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(2), pages 150-164, April.
    15. Brian C. Briggeman & Allan W. Gray & Joshua D. Detre, 2008. "Using Limited Information to Support the Decision to Launch a New Product in the Fruit Juice Market: A Teaching Case Study," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 30(2), pages 370-378.
    16. Akash Dania & Bridget Anakwe & Bernadette Ruf, 2019. "Student Preference for Spreadsheet-Based Learning," Accounting and Finance Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 8(3), pages 1-16, August.
    17. John F. Raffensperger, 2003. "New Guidelines for Spreadsheets," International Journal of Business and Economics, School of Management Development, Feng Chia University, Taichung, Taiwan, vol. 2(2), pages 141-154, August.
    18. Jason R. W. Merrick & Jill R. Hardin & Russell Walker, 2006. "Partnerships in Training," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(4), pages 359-370, August.
    19. Anton Ovchinnikov & Joseph Milner, 2008. "Spreadsheet Model Helps to Assign Medical Residents at the University of Vermont's College of Medicine," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 38(4), pages 311-323, August.
    20. John Miltenburg, 2019. "Online Teaching in a Large, Required, Undergraduate Management Science Course," INFORMS Transactions on Education, INFORMS, vol. 19(2), pages 89-104, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    PROFESSIONAL—OR/MS EDUCATION; SIMULATION;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orinte:v:31:y:2001:i:3:p:66-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.