IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/inm/orijoc/v33y2021i3p915-930.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rapid Discrete Optimization via Simulation with Gaussian Markov Random Fields

Author

Listed:
  • Mark Semelhago

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

  • Barry L. Nelson

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

  • Eunhye Song

    (Department of Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802)

  • Andreas Wächter

    (Department of Industrial Engineering and Management Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois 60208)

Abstract

Inference-based optimization via simulation, which substitutes Gaussian process (GP) learning for the structural properties exploited in mathematical programming, is a powerful paradigm that has been shown to be remarkably effective in problems of modest feasible-region size and decision-variable dimension. The limitation to “modest” problems is a result of the computational overhead and numerical challenges encountered in computing the GP conditional (posterior) distribution on each iteration. In this paper, we substantially expand the size of discrete-decision-variable optimization-via-simulation problems that can be attacked in this way by exploiting a particular GP—discrete Gaussian Markov random fields—and carefully tailored computational methods. The result is the rapid Gaussian Markov Improvement Algorithm (rGMIA), an algorithm that delivers both a global convergence guarantee and finite-sample optimality-gap inference for significantly larger problems. Between infrequent evaluations of the global conditional distribution, rGMIA applies the full power of GP learning to rapidly search smaller sets of promising feasible solutions that need not be spatially close. We carefully document the computational savings via complexity analysis and an extensive empirical study. Summary of Contribution: The broad topic of the paper is optimization via simulation, which means optimizing some performance measure of a system that may only be estimated by executing a stochastic, discrete-event simulation. Stochastic simulation is a core topic and method of operations research. The focus of this paper is on significantly speeding-up the computations underlying an existing method that is based on Gaussian process learning, where the underlying Gaussian process is a discrete Gaussian Markov Random Field. This speed-up is accomplished by employing smart computational linear algebra, state-of-the-art algorithms, and a careful divide-and-conquer evaluation strategy. Problems of significantly greater size than any other existing algorithm with similar guarantees can solve are solved as illustrations.

Suggested Citation

  • Mark Semelhago & Barry L. Nelson & Eunhye Song & Andreas Wächter, 2021. "Rapid Discrete Optimization via Simulation with Gaussian Markov Random Fields," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 915-930, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:3:p:915-930
    DOI: 10.1287/ijoc.2020.0971
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/ijoc.2020.0971
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1287/ijoc.2020.0971?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jing Xie & Peter I. Frazier & Stephen E. Chick, 2016. "Bayesian Optimization via Simulation with Pairwise Sampling and Correlated Prior Beliefs," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 64(2), pages 542-559, April.
    2. Peter Salemi, 2019. "First-order intrinsic Gaussian Markov random fields for discrete optimisation via simulation," Journal of Simulation, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 13(4), pages 272-285, October.
    3. Lihua Sun & L. Jeff Hong & Zhaolin Hu, 2014. "Balancing Exploitation and Exploration in Discrete Optimization via Simulation Through a Gaussian Process-Based Search," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1416-1438, December.
    4. Peter Frazier & Warren Powell & Savas Dayanik, 2009. "The Knowledge-Gradient Policy for Correlated Normal Beliefs," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 21(4), pages 599-613, November.
    5. Peter L. Salemi & Eunhye Song & Barry L. Nelson & Jeremy Staum, 2019. "Gaussian Markov Random Fields for Discrete Optimization via Simulation: Framework and Algorithms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 250-266, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xuefei Lu & Alessandro Rudi & Emanuele Borgonovo & Lorenzo Rosasco, 2020. "Faster Kriging: Facing High-Dimensional Simulators," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(1), pages 233-249, January.
    2. David J. Eckman & Shane G. Henderson, 2022. "Posterior-Based Stopping Rules for Bayesian Ranking-and-Selection Procedures," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(3), pages 1711-1728, May.
    3. Stephen E. Chick & Noah Gans & Özge Yapar, 2022. "Bayesian Sequential Learning for Clinical Trials of Multiple Correlated Medical Interventions," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(7), pages 4919-4938, July.
    4. Jalali, Hamed & Van Nieuwenhuyse, Inneke & Picheny, Victor, 2017. "Comparison of Kriging-based algorithms for simulation optimization with heterogeneous noise," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(1), pages 279-301.
    5. Peter L. Salemi & Eunhye Song & Barry L. Nelson & Jeremy Staum, 2019. "Gaussian Markov Random Fields for Discrete Optimization via Simulation: Framework and Algorithms," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(1), pages 250-266, January.
    6. Tay, Timothy & Osorio, Carolina, 2022. "Bayesian optimization techniques for high-dimensional simulation-based transportation problems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 210-243.
    7. Deniz Preil & Michael Krapp, 2023. "Genetic multi-armed bandits: a reinforcement learning approach for discrete optimization via simulation," Papers 2302.07695, arXiv.org.
    8. Jialei Wang & Scott C. Clark & Eric Liu & Peter I. Frazier, 2020. "Parallel Bayesian Global Optimization of Expensive Functions," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 68(6), pages 1850-1865, November.
    9. Qun Meng & Songhao Wang & Szu Hui Ng, 2022. "Combined Global and Local Search for Optimization with Gaussian Process Models," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(1), pages 622-637, January.
    10. Ehsan Mehdad & Jack P. C. Kleijnen, 2018. "Efficient global optimisation for black-box simulation via sequential intrinsic Kriging," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(11), pages 1725-1737, November.
    11. Wei, Pengfei & Zheng, Yu & Fu, Jiangfeng & Xu, Yuannan & Gao, Weikai, 2023. "An expected integrated error reduction function for accelerating Bayesian active learning of failure probability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    12. Seokhyun Chung & Raed Al Kontar & Zhenke Wu, 2022. "Weakly Supervised Multi-output Regression via Correlated Gaussian Processes," INFORMS Joural on Data Science, INFORMS, vol. 1(2), pages 115-137, October.
    13. Donghun Lee, 2022. "Knowledge Gradient: Capturing Value of Information in Iterative Decisions under Uncertainty," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(23), pages 1-20, November.
    14. Weiwei Fan & L. Jeff Hong & Xiaowei Zhang, 2020. "Distributionally Robust Selection of the Best," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(1), pages 190-208, January.
    15. Jelena Erić Nielsen & Veljko Marinković & Jelena Nikolić, 2019. "A Strategic Approach To Organisational Entrepreneurship: Employees’ Awareness Of Entrepreneurial Strategy," Economic Annals, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Belgrade, vol. 64(222), pages 117-146, July – Se.
    16. Morales-Enciso, Sergio & Branke, Juergen, 2015. "Tracking global optima in dynamic environments with efficient global optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 242(3), pages 744-755.
    17. Emre Barut & Warren Powell, 2014. "Optimal learning for sequential sampling with non-parametric beliefs," Journal of Global Optimization, Springer, vol. 58(3), pages 517-543, March.
    18. J P C Kleijnen & W C M van Beers, 2013. "Monotonicity-preserving bootstrapped Kriging metamodels for expensive simulations," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 64(5), pages 708-717, May.
    19. Jeffrey W. Herrmann & Kunal Mehta, 2020. "Lookahead and Hybrid Sample Allocation Procedures for Multiple Attribute Selection Decisions," Papers 2007.16119, arXiv.org.
    20. Kamiński, Bogumił, 2015. "A method for the updating of stochastic kriging metamodels," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 859-866.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:inm:orijoc:v:33:y:2021:i:3:p:915-930. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Asher (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inforea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.