IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ijr/beejor/v3y2015i4p203-209.html

Are Fluctuations in Gas Consumption Per Capita Transitory? Evidence from LM Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Shahbaz

    (Energy Research Centre, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Lahore, Pakistan)

  • Sakiru Adebola Solarin

    (Room 5012, Faculty of Business, Multimedia University Malaysia, Melaka, Malaysia)

  • Hrushikesh Mallick

    (Centre for Development Studies (CDS), Prasanth Nagar, Ulloor, Trivandrum-695011, Kerala, India)

Abstract

With a view to determine the effectiveness of the policies aimed at boosting natural gas consumption, this paper examines the unit root properties of natural gas in 44 countries, for the period 1965 to 2010. Applying the LM unit root tests, which allow for a maximum of two structural breaks, we are able to reject the null hypothesis of unit root in the natural gas consumption series in 57% of the countries. A key policy implication of this finding is that initiatives designed to have permanent positive effects on natural gas, such as construction of large natural gas pipeline network, are likely to be effective in increasing the share of natural gas consumption in only 43% of the total sample.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Shahbaz & Sakiru Adebola Solarin & Hrushikesh Mallick, 2015. "Are Fluctuations in Gas Consumption Per Capita Transitory? Evidence from LM Unit Root Test with Two Structural Breaks," Bulletin of Energy Economics (BEE), The Economics and Social Development Organization (TESDO), vol. 3(4), pages 203-209, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:ijr:beejor:v:3:y:2015:i:4:p:203-209
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://tesdo.org/shared/upload/pdf/papers/BEE,%203_4_,%20203-209%20.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://tesdo.org/journal_detail.php?paper_id=165&expand_year=2015
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Solarin, Sakiru Adebola & Lean, Hooi Hooi, 2016. "Are fluctuations in oil consumption permanent or transitory? Evidence from linear and nonlinear unit root tests," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 262-270.
    2. Yifei Cai & Cosimo Magazzino, 2019. "Are shocks to natural gas consumption transitory or permanent? A more powerful panel unit root test on the G7 countries," Natural Resources Forum, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 43(2), pages 111-120, May.
    3. Schneider, Nicolas & Strielkowski, Wadim, 2023. "Modelling the unit root properties of electricity data—A general note on time-domain applications," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 618(C).
    4. Solarin, Sakiru Adebola & Ozturk, Ilhan, 2016. "The relationship between natural gas consumption and economic growth in OPEC members," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 1348-1356.
    5. Shahbaz, Muhammad & Omay, Tolga & Roubaud, David, 2019. "Sharp and Smooth Breaks in Unit Root Testing of Renewable Energy Consumption: The Way Forward," MPRA Paper 92176, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 11 Feb 2019.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q4 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Energy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ijr:beejor:v:3:y:2015:i:4:p:203-209. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dr. Muhammad Shahbaz (PhD Applied Economics) The email address of this maintainer does not seem to be valid anymore. Please ask Dr. Muhammad Shahbaz (PhD Applied Economics) to update the entry or send us the correct address (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tesdopk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.