IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jthi00/v18y2022i7p1-28.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Quantify the Behaviour Intention of Individuals to Control SC Performance by Exploring Cloud Storage Services: An Extended UTAUT2 Approach

Author

Listed:
  • K. A. Asraar Ahmed

    (VIT-AP School of Business, VIT-AP University, Amaravati Campus, Andhra Pradesh, India)

  • Anoop Kumar Sahu

    (Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (Central), Bilaspur, India)

  • Atul Kumar Sahu

    (Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (Central), Bilaspur, India)

  • Nitin Kumar Sahu

    (Guru Ghasidas Vishwavidyalaya (Central), Bilaspur, India)

Abstract

The Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) is explored as a theoretical background to build extended UTAUT2 model with relevant variables for examining the cloud storage services technology acceptance at individual level to respond the current and future SCM operations. The research employed purposive sampling method for data collection. The questionnaire is distributed in booklet format to participants who had experienced in using online cloud storage service platforms (e.g., Google Drive, Microsoft One Drive, etc.). The data are collected from participates dwelling at Chennai metropolitan in South India. The data is analysed by using structural equation modelling technique through Smart PLS 2 software. The performance expectancy, social influence, trust, and perceived speed of access are found to be the strong significant determinants affecting and changing the behavioural intention of individual (customers) towards using cloud storage service technology in managing own firm SCM networks and operations.

Suggested Citation

  • K. A. Asraar Ahmed & Anoop Kumar Sahu & Atul Kumar Sahu & Nitin Kumar Sahu, 2022. "Quantify the Behaviour Intention of Individuals to Control SC Performance by Exploring Cloud Storage Services: An Extended UTAUT2 Approach," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 18(7), pages 1-28, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:18:y:2022:i:7:p:1-28
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJTHI.306227
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Deborah R. Compeau & Christopher A. Higgins, 1995. "Application of Social Cognitive Theory to Training for Computer Skills," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 6(2), pages 118-143, June.
    2. Ho-Chang Chae & Chang E. Koh & Minjun Jeon, 2020. "Can Cognitive Style Predict Adoption of an Emerging Technology?: A Study of Cognitive Style and Its Influence on the Perception of a New Technology," International Journal of Technology and Human Interaction (IJTHI), IGI Global, vol. 16(1), pages 18-35, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gonzalez, George C. & Sharma, Pratyush N. & Galletta, Dennis F., 2012. "The antecedents of the use of continuous auditing in the internal auditing context," International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Elsevier, vol. 13(3), pages 248-262.
    2. Fatima Zahra Barrane & Gahima Egide Karuranga & Diane Poulin, 2018. "Technology Adoption and Diffusion: A New Application of the UTAUT Model," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 15(06), pages 1-19, December.
    3. Su-Chen(Cecilia) Lin & Mei-Chen Chuang & Chen-Yuan Huang & Chia-En Liu, 2023. "Nursing Staff’s Behavior Intention to Use Mobile Technology: An Exploratory Study Employing the UTAUT 2 Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, November.
    4. Sunyoung Hlee & Jimin Lee & Daeseop Moon & Changsok Yoo, 0. "The acceptance of ‘intelligent trade shows’: Visitors’ evaluations of IS innovation," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-13.
    5. Samir Mirdasse, 2024. "Fondements théoriques d'utilisation des technologies de l'information et des systèmes d'information. Proposition d’un cadre intégrateur de groupe de variables clés," Post-Print hal-04853813, HAL.
    6. Liu, Chuang-Chun, 2016. "Understanding player behavior in online games: The role of gender," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 265-274.
    7. Nripendra P. Rana & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Banita Lal & Michael D. Williams & Marc Clement, 2017. "Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 549-568, June.
    8. Ivan Ðula & Tabea Berberena & Ksenia Keplinger & Maria Wirzberger, 2024. "From challenges to opportunities: navigating the human response to automated agents in the workplace," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, December.
    9. Hee-Woong Kim & Hock Chuan Chan & Atreyi Kankanhalli, 2012. "What Motivates People to Purchase Digital Items on Virtual Community Websites? The Desire for Online Self-Presentation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 23(4), pages 1232-1245, December.
    10. Han Lv & Xueyan Cao & Shiqi Chen & Liqun Liu, 2022. "Public and Private Information Sharing under “New Normal” of COVID-19: Understanding the Roles of Habit and Outcome Expectation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-26, May.
    11. Lionel P. Robert Jr. & Tracy Ann Sykes, 2017. "Extending the Concept of Control Beliefs: Integrating the Role of Advice Networks," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 28(1), pages 84-96, March.
    12. Shaio Yan Huang & Chao-Hsiung Lee & An-An Chiu & David C. Yen, 2015. "How business process reengineering affects information technology investment and employee performance under different performance measurement," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 1133-1144, October.
    13. repec:dau:papers:123456789/13000 is not listed on IDEAS
    14. Arwa Mohammed Asiri & Sabah Abdullah Al-Somali & Rozan Omar Maghrabi, 2024. "The Integration of Sustainable Technology and Big Data Analytics in Saudi Arabian SMEs: A Path to Improved Business Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-28, April.
    15. Jozé Braz de Araújo & Silvia Novaes Zilber, 2016. "What Factors Lead Companies to Adopt Social Media in their processes: Proposal and Test of a Measurement Model," Brazilian Business Review, Fucape Business School, vol. 13(6), pages 260-290, November.
    16. Kwok-Kee Wei & Hock-Hai Teo & Hock Chuan Chan & Bernard C. Y. Tan, 2011. "Conceptualizing and Testing a Social Cognitive Model of the Digital Divide," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 170-187, March.
    17. Kaynak, Ramazan & Sert, Tuba & Sert, Gurkan & Akyuz, Bulent, 2015. "Supply chain unethical behaviors and continuity of relationship: Using the PLS approach for testing moderation effects of inter-organizational justice," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 83-91.
    18. Paul Juinn Bing Tan, 2019. "An Empirical Study of How the Learning Attitudes of College Students toward English E-Tutoring Websites Affect Site Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-19, March.
    19. Barbara L. Marcolin & Deborah R. Compeau & Malcolm C. Munro & Sid L. Huff, 2000. "Assessing User Competence: Conceptualization and Measurement," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 11(1), pages 37-60, March.
    20. Wang, Qingfeng & Sun, Xu, 2016. "Investigating gameplay intention of the elderly using an Extended Technology Acceptance Model (ETAM)," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 59-68.
    21. Jie Gao & Wenjing Jia & Jun Yin, 2024. "Exploring Smartphone User Interface Experience-Sharing Behavior: Design Perception and Motivation-Driven Mechanisms through the SOR Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-22, August.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jthi00:v:18:y:2022:i:7:p:1-28. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.