IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/igg/jitpm0/v14y2023i1p1-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Rationale of Management Principles of Providing Sustainable Development of Rural Territorial Communities

Author

Listed:
  • Yulia Bezdushna

    (National Scientific Centre “Institute of Agrarian Economics”, Ukraine)

  • Mykhailo Prodanchuk

    (National Scientific Centre “Institute of Agrarian Economics”, Ukraine)

  • Valeriy Zhuk

    (National Scientific Centre “Institute of Agrarian Economics”, Ukraine)

  • Evheniya Popko

    (National Scientific Centre “Institute of Agrarian Economics”, Ukraine)

Abstract

The motivation of the research is to find the answer to why the reform of decentralization of government in Ukraine does not contribute to the sustainable development of the countryside and the peasantry. The objective of the article is to substantiate the managerial principles used to ensure sustainable development of rural territories based on the establishment of a village preservation model of the agrarian system in Ukraine. The article identifies basic features of rural development policy and management using various agrarian system models, in particular, the agricultural holding model, which is currently being implemented in Ukraine, and the village preservation model, which is proposed for implementation in order to preserve and revive rural life in Ukraine. The main achieved results include managerial principles of sustainable rural development in the village preservation model of the agricultural system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yulia Bezdushna & Mykhailo Prodanchuk & Valeriy Zhuk & Evheniya Popko, 2023. "Rationale of Management Principles of Providing Sustainable Development of Rural Territorial Communities," International Journal of Information Technology Project Management (IJITPM), IGI Global Scientific Publishing, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:1-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://services.igi-global.com/resolvedoi/resolve.aspx?doi=10.4018/IJITPM.323209
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chitra Sriyani De Silva Lokuwaduge & Kumudini Heenetigala, 2017. "Integrating Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Disclosure for a Sustainable Development: An Australian Study," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(4), pages 438-450, May.
    2. Oleh Sokil, 2017. "Concept of Accounting for Sustainable Development," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 1, pages 85-92, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yuliia Bezdushna & Mykhailo Prodanchuk & Оlha Panchenko & Tetiana Storozhuk & Lesia Kucher, 2024. "Accounting as a tool for assessing indicators of achieving sustainable development goals," Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, Agricultural and Resource Economics: International Scientific E-Journal, vol. 10(4), December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ramona Zharfpeykan, 2021. "Representative account or greenwashing? Voluntary sustainability reports in Australia's mining/metals and financial services industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 2209-2223, May.
    2. Dara G. Schniederjans & Mehrnaz Khalajhedayati, 2021. "Competitive sustainability and stakeholder engagement: Exploring awareness, motivation, and capability," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 808-824, February.
    3. Satish Kumar & Dipasha Sharma & Sandeep Rao & Weng Marc Lim & Sachin Kumar Mangla, 2025. "Past, present, and future of sustainable finance: insights from big data analytics through machine learning of scholarly research," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 345(2), pages 1061-1104, February.
    4. Petridis, Konstantinos & Tampakoudis, Ioannis & Drogalas, George & Kiosses, Nikolaos, 2022. "A Support Vector Machine model for classification of efficiency: An application to M&A," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    5. Sisi Que & Yu Huang & Kwame Awuah-Offei & Liang Wang & Songlin Liu, 2023. "Discrete Choice Experiment Consideration: A Framework for Mining Community Consultation with Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-17, August.
    6. Marcia Sierdovski & Luiz Alberto Pilatti & Priscila Rubbo, 2022. "Organizational Competencies in the Development of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Criteria in the Industrial Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Haoming Ding & Zerui Wang, 2025. "The Influence of Institutional Pressures on Environmental, Social, and Governance Responsibility Fulfillment: Insights from Chinese Listed Firms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-13, April.
    8. Rui Coelho & Shital Jayantilal & Joao J. Ferreira, 2023. "The impact of social responsibility on corporate financial performance: A systematic literature review," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 30(4), pages 1535-1560, July.
    9. Darren D. Lee & John Hua Fan & Victor S. H. Wong, 2021. "No more excuses! Performance of ESG‐integrated portfolios in Australia," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(S1), pages 2407-2450, April.
    10. Ramiz ur Rehman & Muhammad Zain ul Abidin & Rizwan Ali & Safwan Mohd Nor & Muhammad Akram Naseem & Mudassar Hasan & Muhammad Ishfaq Ahmad, 2021. "The Integration of Conventional Equity Indices with Environmental, Social, and Governance Indices: Evidence from Emerging Economies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-27, January.
    11. Bo Wang & Yang Yang, 2025. "The Impact of Female Board Representation on Corporate Environmental, Social and Governance Performance: A Dual Perspective Based on Institutional Environment and Market Competition," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(3), pages 3802-3813, May.
    12. Yavuz GÜL & Ceren ALTUNTAŞ, 2024. "Do ESG Ratings Affect Stock Prices? The Case of Developed and Emerging Stock Markets," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 32(60).
    13. Gianna S. Himmelsbach & Hyacinthe R. Zabré & Andrea Leuenberger & Astrid M. Knoblauch & Fritz Brugger & Mirko S. Winkler, 2023. "Exploring the Impact of Mining on Community Health and Health Service Delivery: Perceptions of Key Informants Involved in Gold Mining Communities in Burkina Faso," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(24), pages 1-21, December.
    14. Mahdi Salehi & Grzegorz Zimon & Arash Arianpoor & Fatemeh Eidi Gholezoo, 2022. "The Impact of Investment Efficiency on Firm Value and Moderating Role of Institutional Ownership and Board Independence," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-13, April.
    15. Khan, Muhammad Arif, 2022. "ESG disclosure and Firm performance: A bibliometric and meta analysis," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 61(C).
    16. Mansi Jain & Gagan Deep Sharma & Mrinalini Srivastava, 2019. "Can Sustainable Investment Yield Better Financial Returns: A Comparative Study of ESG Indices and MSCI Indices," Risks, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, February.
    17. Ali Meftah Gerged, 2021. "Factors affecting corporate environmental disclosure in emerging markets: The role of corporate governance structures," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 609-629, January.
    18. Wang, Ren & Bian, Yuxiang & Xiong, Xiong, 2024. "Impact of ESG preferences on investments and emissions in a DSGE framework," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    19. Eskantar, Marianna & Zopounidis, Constantin & Doumpos, Michalis & Galariotis, Emilios & Guesmi, Khaled, 2024. "Navigating ESG complexity: An in-depth analysis of sustainability criteria, frameworks, and impact assessment," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 95(PA).
    20. Ali Meftah Gerged & Eshani Beddewela & Christopher J. Cowton, 2021. "Is corporate environmental disclosure associated with firm value? A multicountry study of Gulf Cooperation Council firms," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(1), pages 185-203, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:igg:jitpm0:v:14:y:2023:i:1:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Journal Editor (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.igi-global.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.