IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ids/ijhrdm/v3y2003i3p191-202.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nepotism's effect on employee satisfaction and organisational commitment: an empirical study

Author

Listed:
  • Dennis R. Laker, Mary L. Williams

Abstract

Most of what we know about nepotism is anecdotal. The benefits mentioned have been: lower recruiting costs, training costs, turnover, dissatisfaction, and higher levels of loyalty, morale and trust. Negative aspects have included perceptions of favouritism, problems with discipline, potential fraud, and breached confidentiality. In all cases, the bases for these claims have been anecdotal. If we are to really understand the impact of nepotism on employees and organisations, we need to go beyond anecdote and measure nepotism empirically. Research has shown that employees routinely show dissatisfaction where they experience favouritism and inequity. The present study examined the effect of nepotism on employee satisfaction and organisational commitment. Nepotic relationships in this study included the following: between parents and children, siblings, extended family members and marriage. Employee's perceptions of equity, influenced by nepotism, are assumed to affect employee morale and commitment. Most work has assumed that nepotism will always lead to decreased employee satisfaction and commitment. Further research should explore both the positive and negative effects of nepotism, and the conditions under which each exists.

Suggested Citation

  • Dennis R. Laker, Mary L. Williams, 2003. "Nepotism's effect on employee satisfaction and organisational commitment: an empirical study," International Journal of Human Resources Development and Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 3(3), pages 191-202.
  • Handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:3:y:2003:i:3:p:191-202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=3660
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. V.A. Santhosh & K.V. Krishnan Kutty, 2012. "Impact of Co-working Couples on their Job Performance," Management and Labour Studies, XLRI Jamshedpur, School of Business Management & Human Resources, vol. 37(2), pages 125-141, May.
    2. Sarah Hudson & Helena V González-Gómez & Cyrlene Claasen, 2019. "Legitimacy, Particularism and Employee Commitment and Justice," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(3), pages 589-603, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ids:ijhrdm:v:3:y:2003:i:3:p:191-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sarah Parker (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.inderscience.com/browse/index.php?journalID=15 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.