IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jsd123/v10y2017i5p173.html

A Quantitative Nexus Approach to Analyze the Interlinkages across the Sustainable Development Goals

Author

Listed:
  • Ali Karnib

Abstract

The 2030 Agenda for sustainable development comprises 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that aimed at achieving universal access to basic needs and services for all. Moreover, the SDGs present a broad and comprehensive set of goals that cover social, economic and environmental aspects. The global SDGs are interlinked and they are either mutually supportive or conflicting. Informing about the interlinkages enables policy makers to harness synergies and manage any potential conflicts between policies engaged to achieve the SDGs. This paper introduces a framework to analyze interlinkages across the SDGs based on a bottom-up process which is supported by a quantitative nexus theoretical method to evaluate the direct and indirect quantitative interactions among SDG variables. Firstly, the general concept of analyzing interactions based on a bottom-up process is presented. Secondly, a quantitative nexus method based on input-output theory that permits the evaluation of the direct and indirect interaction effects among SDG variables is introduced. Lastly, a numerical experiment is presented and results are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali Karnib, 2017. "A Quantitative Nexus Approach to Analyze the Interlinkages across the Sustainable Development Goals," Journal of Sustainable Development, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(5), pages 173-173, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:10:y:2017:i:5:p:173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/download/69679/38716
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jsd/article/view/69679
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Pedercini, Matteo & Barney, Gerald O., 2010. "Dynamic analysis of interventions designed to achieve millennium development goals (MDG): The case of Ghana," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 44(2), pages 89-99, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Elisa Sicuri & Azucena Bardají & Betuel Sigauque & Maria Maixenchs & Ariel Nhacolo & Delino Nhalungo & Eusebio Macete & Pedro L Alonso & Clara Menéndez, 2011. "Costs Associated with Low Birth Weight in a Rural Area of Southern Mozambique," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(12), pages 1-9, December.
    2. Francesco Tonini & Francesco Davide Sanvito & Fabrizio Colombelli & Emanuela Colombo, 2022. "Improving Sustainable Access to Electricity in Rural Tanzania: A System Dynamics Approach to the Matembwe Village," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Jiawei Zhong & Xun Li, 2022. "Interlinkages among County-Level Construction Indicators and Related Sustainable Development Goals in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-22, November.
    4. Pedercini, Matteo & Arquitt, Steven & Collste, David & Herren, Hans, 2018. "Harvesting synergy from Sustainable Development Goal interactions," SocArXiv jt6r7, Center for Open Science.
    5. Matteo Pedercini & Santiago Movilla Blanco & Birgit Kopainsky, 2011. "Application of the Malaria Management Model to the Analysis of Costs and Benefits of DDT versus Non-DDT Malaria Control," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(11), pages 1-12, November.
    6. Mele, Antonio & Paglialunga, Elena & Sforna, Giorgia, 2021. "Climate cooperation from Kyoto to Paris: What can be learnt from the CDM experience?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    7. Omar A. Guerrero & Gonzalo Casta~neda, 2019. "Quantifying the Coherence of Development Policy Priorities," Papers 1902.00430, arXiv.org.
    8. Benjamin L. Turner & Hector M. Menendez & Roger Gates & Luis O. Tedeschi & Alberto S. Atzori, 2016. "System Dynamics Modeling for Agricultural and Natural Resource Management Issues: Review of Some Past Cases and Forecasting Future Roles," Resources, MDPI, vol. 5(4), pages 1-24, November.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jsd123:v:10:y:2017:i:5:p:173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.