IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/jpl123/v18y2025i2p1.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hume's Doubts About Politics: A Critique and Reimagining of Social Contract Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Li Gongqing
  • Muhammad Azizan Sabjan
  • Nur Izzaty Mohamad

Abstract

This paper examines and assesses Hume's skepticism regarding the social contract theories of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Consequently, Hume, in response to the assertions of contractarians who argued that political power is founded on a contract among rational individuals, contended that political authority originates from custom, use, and historical precedent. His critique consequently refutes the function of reason in establishing the legitimacy of political institutions, contending that they develop over time. Hume adopts a radical enlightenment perspective, asserting that every revolution always results in political instability. The paper seeks to elucidate the political theories of David Hume and articulate the relevance of this philosopher's ideas in analyzing contemporary politics and political systems, as well as in assessing which political frameworks should be considered legitimate today. This research analyses Hume's perspectives on custom, gradualism, and the emotional foundation of political authority, providing a comprehensive account of political legitimacy in historical and present contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Li Gongqing & Muhammad Azizan Sabjan & Nur Izzaty Mohamad, 2025. "Hume's Doubts About Politics: A Critique and Reimagining of Social Contract Theory," Journal of Politics and Law, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 18(2), pages 1-1, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:jpl123:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:1
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/download/0/0/51324/55736
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/jpl/article/view/0/51324
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:jpl123:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:1. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.