IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/gjhsjl/v13y2021i5p44.html

Self-Ear Cleaning Practices and the Associated Risks: A Systematic Review

Author

Listed:
  • Linda N Lukolo
  • Lukanga C Kimera
  • Gentz Pilbee

Abstract

BACKGROUND- Naturally the ear produces soft wax from the sebaceous and ceruminous gland. This is what is referred to as earwax. This wax is important for protection of the ear by trapping dust and other foreign particles that could damage the eardrum. It also has some antibacterial properties. Jaw movements, like during chewing, moves the old earwax from inside the ear canal to the outside and finally flakes off. Build-up of this wax in the ear causes hearing loss, pain in the ear, irritation, dizziness and ringing in the ears. Self-ear cleaning refers to self-insertion of objects into the ear canal, with an attempt to remove the wax to get rid of these symptoms. It is a common practice amongst many individuals. Potentially, this rids the ear of its protective defences in addition to posing a risk of ear related injuries. This review paper aims to determine the prevalence of self-ear cleaning, the common methods used and the complications associated with this practice. METHODS- Electronic retrieval of articles for review was done from PubMed, Google and Google scholar with key-ward – self-ear cleaning, ear-wax, cerumen. Many articles were retrieved but only a few were about self-ear cleaning and only seven could be included in this review. The inclusion criteria included- article published in English language; study carried between 2005 and 2020 inclusive; article discussing materials used and complications associated with self-ear cleaning. Articles older than 15 years or published in languages other than English were excluded. RESULTS- On average the prevalence of self-ear cleaning amongst all studies was 76.6%. The commonest method used for ear cleaning was cotton buds with an average of 69.6%. Wax/dirt removal was the commonest reason for engaging in this practice. Several complications arising from this practice included perforation of eardrum, retained foreign body and otitis externa. CONCLUSION- In addition to ridding the ear of its natural protection, self-ear cleaning is associated with a risk of injury to the ear drum and retention of foreign bodies. Community education to avoid this practice is therefore of paramount importance. Trained health care providers should be consulted whenever someone has a problem related to hearing or any other symptoms.

Suggested Citation

  • Linda N Lukolo & Lukanga C Kimera & Gentz Pilbee, 2021. "Self-Ear Cleaning Practices and the Associated Risks: A Systematic Review," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(5), pages 1-44, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:44
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/download/0/0/45017/47679
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://www.ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/gjhs/article/view/0/45017
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Antony Young, 2014. "1 + 1 = 3," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Brand Media Strategy, edition 0, chapter 0, pages 81-99, Palgrave Macmillan.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dwi Hapsari Tjandrarini & Puti Sari Hidayangsih & Rofingatul Mubasyiroh, 2020. "Barriers to Treatment-Seeking Behavior Among Adolescents With Anxiety in Indonesia," Global Journal of Health Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(8), pages 185-185, July.
    2. Jenny Saxton & Simone N Rodda & Natalia Booth & Stephanie S Merkouris & Nicki A Dowling, 2021. "The efficacy of Personalized Normative Feedback interventions across addictions: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(4), pages 1-31, April.
    3. Shikuo Chen & Chenhui Wei & Tianhong Yang & Wancheng Zhu & Honglei Liu & Pathegama Gamage Ranjith, 2018. "Three-Dimensional Numerical Investigation of Coupled Flow-Stress-Damage Failure Process in Heterogeneous Poroelastic Rocks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, July.
    4. Masahiro Kato & Masatoshi Uehara & Shota Yasui, 2020. "Off-Policy Evaluation and Learning for External Validity under a Covariate Shift," Papers 2002.11642, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2020.
    5. Siu-ming To & Cheong-wing Wong Victor & Dick-man Leung Daniel & Cheryl Danielle Lau & Xuebing Su, 2021. "Navigating Risk Discourses: a Narrative Analysis of Parental Experiences in the Career and Life Development of Youth not in Education, Employment, or Training," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 16(5), pages 2039-2058, October.
    6. Leila Meratian Esfahani & Lester W. Johnson, 2018. "Stakeholders’ Engagement and Strategic Management of Social Media," Journal of International Business Research and Marketing, Inovatus Services Ltd., vol. 3(6), pages 47-56, September.
    7. Blanco, Cristina Faraco & Kraußlach, Mariannne & Lange, Miguel Montero & Pfeffer-Hoffmann, Christian, 2015. "Die Auswirkungen der Wirtschaftskrise auf die innereuropäische Arbeitsmigration am Beispiel der neuen spanischen Migration nach Deutschland," Working Paper Forschungsförderung 002, Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, Düsseldorf.
    8. Ana-Maria GRIGORE & Sorin-George TOMA, 2014. "Perceptions Of Entrepreneurship As A Career Path," Proceedings of the INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 8(1), pages 153-165, November.
    9. Nadia Zrelli & Imene Berguiga & Ali Abdallah & Philippe Adair, 2017. "Risques spécifiques et profitabilité des banques islamiques en région MENA," Post-Print hal-01667423, HAL.
    10. Evelyn Balsells & Laurence Guillot & Harish Nair & Moe H Kyaw, 2017. "Serotype distribution of Streptococcus pneumoniae causing invasive disease in children in the post-PCV era: A systematic review and meta-analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Yehui Tong & Zelia Serrasqueiro, 2020. "The Influential Factors on Capital Structure: A Study on Portuguese High Technology and Medium-High Technology Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises," International Journal of Financial Research, International Journal of Financial Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 11(4), pages 23-35, July.
    12. Pelly, Diane & Daly, Michael & Delaney, Liam & Doyle, Orla, 2022. "Worker stress, burnout, and wellbeing before and during the COVID-19 restrictions in the United Kingdom," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 115098, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    13. Francine D. Blau & Anne E. Winkler, 2017. "Women, Work, and Family," NBER Working Papers 23644, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Mario Coccia, 2019. "Technological Parasitism," Papers 1901.09073, arXiv.org.
    15. Evgenia Anastasiou & Georgia Anagnostou & George Theodossiou & Vasileios Papamargaritis, 2020. "Physicians' Brain Drain: Investigating the Determinants to Emigrate Through Empirical Evidence," International Journal of Business and Economic Sciences Applied Research (IJBESAR), Democritus University of Thrace (DUTH), Kavala Campus, Greece, vol. 13(2), pages 83-92, September.
    16. Dirk Dohse & Rajeev K. Goel & Devrim Göktepe‐Hultén, 2021. "Paths academic scientists take to entrepreneurship: Disaggregating direct and indirect influences," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 42(7), pages 1740-1753, October.
    17. Song, Honghua & Zhao, Yixin & Elsworth, Derek & Jiang, Yaodong & Wang, Jiehao, 2020. "Anisotropy of acoustic emission in coal under the uniaxial loading condition," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    18. Marko Peric & Vanja Vitezic & Ana Peric Hadzic, 2020. "Firm Size €“ Firm Growth Relationship During Economic Crisis," Economic Thought and Practice, Department of Economics and Business, University of Dubrovnik, vol. 29(1), pages 29-53, june.
    19. Vladimir Davydenko & Jerzy Kaźmierczyk & Gulnara Fatykhovna Romashkina & Elżbieta Żelichowska, 2017. "Diversity of employee incentives from the perspective of banks employees in Poland - empirical approach," Post-Print hal-01766506, HAL.
    20. Irit Keynan & Alon Lazar, 2017. "Defining the Good Citizen: Online Conceptions of American Members of the Yahoo! Answers Community," International Journal of Social Science Studies, Redfame publishing, vol. 5(4), pages 6-13, April.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:gjhsjl:v:13:y:2021:i:5:p:44. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.