IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v9y2016i11p59.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Students’ Preferences and Attitude toward Oral Error Correction Techniques at Yanbu University College, Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Bushra Alamri
  • Hala Fawzi

Abstract

Error correction has been one of the core areas in the field of English language teaching. It is “seen as a form of feedback given to learners on their language use†(Amara, 2015). Many studies investigated the use of different techniques to correct students’ oral errors. However, only a few focused on students’ preferences and attitude toward oral error correction techniques, which determine students’ success in language learning. This quantitative research explored teachers’ and students’ preferences as well as students’ attitude toward the use of oral error correction techniques in the language classroom. The participants of the study were English language students and English language teachers at Yanbu University College (YUC) in Yanbu Industrial City, Saudi Arabia. A classroom observation checklist and questionnaires were used to collect the data. The study findings revealed that recast and explicit correction are the preferred techniques by the majority of the students and teachers. The findings also indicated that students have positive attitude toward oral error correction. As the classroom observation revealed that recast was highly used by teachers, it is recommended that teachers should also use other techniques to correct students’ oral errors. In addition, it is recommended that before correcting students’ oral errors teachers should always take into account the purpose of the activity and the proficiency level of students.

Suggested Citation

  • Bushra Alamri & Hala Fawzi, 2016. "Students’ Preferences and Attitude toward Oral Error Correction Techniques at Yanbu University College, Saudi Arabia," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 9(11), pages 1-59, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:9:y:2016:i:11:p:59
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/63777/34263
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/63777
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Siti Norliana Ghazali & Roszainora Setia & Chittra Muthusamy & Kamaruzaman Jusoff, 2009. "ESL Students’ Attitude towards Texts and Teaching Methods Used in Literature Classes," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 2(4), pages 1-51, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ghadah Al Murshidi, 2014. "UAE University Male Students’ Interests Impact on Reading and Writing Performance and Improvement," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(9), pages 1-57, September.
    2. Abdullah Alfauzan & Abduljabbar Hussain, 2017. "Attitude towards and Perception of Literature in EFL Setting: A Case Study on QU Male Undergraduate Students," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(1), pages 1-1, January.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:9:y:2016:i:11:p:59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.