IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v7y2014i4p83.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Relationship between Saudi English Major University Students’ Writing Performance and Their Learning Style and Strategy Use

Author

Listed:
  • Miriam A. Alkubaidi

Abstract

This study investigates the link between writing tasks, learners’ learning style preference, and writing strategy use. It also investigates if students with various proficiency levels stem from different learning style preference and use different writing strategies. This research attempts to answer the following research questions- what are the most common learning style preferences of Saudi undergraduate students majoring in English? what are the most common writing strategies used by Saudi students when writing an essay? Is the choice of writing strategy related to a learner’s learning style preference and writing task, and how might they be linked with one another? And finally does the use of writing strategies contribute to students’ writing performance? The sample of the study consisted of 74 Saudi female undergraduate students in their final year of their bachelor degree in King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia. Two questionnaires were used- (a) the Perceptual Learning Style Preference by Reid (1987), and (b) a writing strategy questionnaire by Petri and Czárl (2003). Moreover, students were asked to choose one of the two TOEFL writing prompts to write an essay. The data received from the returned questionnaires and writing tests were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics using SPSS19. Results indicated that Saudi female students were mostly auditory and group learners. As for the writing strategies, Saudi learners used more “before writing†strategies than “during writing†strategies and “reviewing writing†strategies. Results revealed that there was no correlation between the participants’ learning style preference and writing strategies, nor their use of writing strategies and their writing proficiency. As a whole, this study contributed to the ESL/EFL field by providing information on Saudi undergraduate female learners in terms of their preferred perceptual learning style, their level of writing proficiency, and indeed their use of writing strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Miriam A. Alkubaidi, 2014. "The Relationship between Saudi English Major University Students’ Writing Performance and Their Learning Style and Strategy Use," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 7(4), pages 1-83, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:7:y:2014:i:4:p:83
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/34933/19895
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/34933
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Khaled Nasser Ali Al-Mwzaiji & Ahmad Abdullah Salih Muhammad, 2023. "EFL Learning and Vision 2030 in Saudi Arabia: A Critical Perspective," World Journal of English Language, Sciedu Press, vol. 13(2), pages 435-435, March.
    2. repec:thr:techub:10024:y:2021:i:1:p:769-784 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Khalid Al-Seghayer, 2021. "Characteristics of Saudi EFL Learners’ Learning Styles," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(7), pages 1-82, July.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:7:y:2014:i:4:p:83. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.