IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v13y2020i9p72.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Enhancing Saudi Students’ Competence in Paragraph Writing

Author

Listed:
  • Omar Obaid Alrouji

Abstract

Blended learning approach has become an emerging trend in the field of education and has caught the attention and interest of many researchers as a new approach to encourage students in their learning process. The present study aimed at examining the effectiveness of blended learning in improving Saudi EFL students’ English paragraph writing at Shaqra University. The sample of the study consists of 70 EFL students at Shaqra University. The experiment was conducted for six weeks (2018). A pre-test and post-paragraph writing test was used to measure the effectiveness of the blended learning in enhancing paragraph writing skills. Results showed that there were significant differences in the mean scores of the control group (traditional teaching mode) and the experimental group (blended learning) in favor of the experimental group. This proved the effectiveness of blended learning approach in developing Saudi students’ competence in paragraph writing.

Suggested Citation

  • Omar Obaid Alrouji, 2020. "The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Enhancing Saudi Students’ Competence in Paragraph Writing," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(9), pages 1-72, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:72
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/0/0/43515/45802
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/0/43515
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nuha Abdullah Alsmari, 2019. "Fostering EFL Students’ Paragraph Writing Using Edmodo," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 12(10), pages 1-44, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      JEL classification:

      • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
      • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:13:y:2020:i:9:p:72. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.