IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/eltjnl/v10y2017i9p69.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Major and Meta-cognitive Reading Strategy Use at Al-Balqa Applied University

Author

Listed:
  • Tamador Abu-Snoubar

Abstract

This quantitative study aimed to investigate and compare the use of metacognitive reading Strategies among English as a foreign language students at Al-Balqa Applied University based on their academic field of study. The Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) (Mokhtari & Sheory, 2002) was the instrument employed. This survey divides the strategies into three categories- global, problem solving and support strategies. The 86 participants are enrolled in different academic fields of study and were classified into two groups- students of the faculties of humanities (39=45.3%) and scientific faculties students (47=54.7%). The participants proved to be high users of the overall strategies (M=3.6023, S.D.=1.3189) and they employed the strategies in the following order- problem solving, support and global. No statistically significant changes were found between the two groups concerning at the significance level of 0.05. The most employed strategy by the humanities students was the support strategy “I go back and forth in the text to find relationships among ideas in it†(M=4.5385, S.D.=.83661). The scientific faculties students top ranked strategy was problem solving “I read slowly and carefully to make sure I understand what I am reading†(M=4.2128, S.D.=0.8831). The finding obtained would help EFL curricula planners and teachers to deepen their understanding of the learners’ reading procedures.

Suggested Citation

  • Tamador Abu-Snoubar, 2017. "English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Major and Meta-cognitive Reading Strategy Use at Al-Balqa Applied University," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 10(9), pages 1-69, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:10:y:2017:i:9:p:69
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/download/69891/38059
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/elt/article/view/69891
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Negmeldin O. Alsheikh & Kouider Mokhtari, 2011. "An Examination of the Metacognitive Reading Strategies Used by Native Speakers of Arabic When Reading in English and Arabic," English Language Teaching, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(2), pages 151-151, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Aigul Akhmetova & Gaysha Imambayeva & Benő Csapó, 2022. "Reading Strategies and Reading Achievement in Middle School: Kazakhstani Young Learners," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, July.
    2. Somayeh Nilforoushan & Mojgan Rashtchi & Gholam-Reza Abbasian, 2023. "Exploring the Perceived and Real Metacognitive Reading Strategies of Iranian EFL Learners: Different Text Types in Focus," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(1), pages 21582440231, March.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:eltjnl:v:10:y:2017:i:9:p:69. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.