IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibn/assjnl/v22y2026i2p15.html

Passive Participation and Elite Capture in China’s State-Led Projects: A Case Study of Farmer Agency under the SLPS

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang Xujun
  • Azeem Fazwan Bin Ahmad Farouk

Abstract

China’s State-Led Project System (SLPS) has delivered significant rural infrastructure but generated a persistent governance dilemma. This paper analyzes a "dual dilemma"- the coexistence of passive farmer participation and elite capture of resources. Based on a case study of a rural tourism project in Village W, it finds the SLPS's top-down, target-driven logic renders farmer involvement merely symbolic. This disempowerment creates an institutional vacuum that enables local elites to exploit information asymmetries and patronage networks to appropriate project benefits. We argue these dynamics are mutually reinforcing, forming a vicious cycle that erodes farmer agency and subverts inclusive development goals. The study contributes to rural governance literature by conceptualizing farmers’ response as "negative agency"—a strategic disengagement distinct from overt resistance, which offers new insights into the complexities of authoritarian governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang Xujun & Azeem Fazwan Bin Ahmad Farouk, 2026. "Passive Participation and Elite Capture in China’s State-Led Projects: A Case Study of Farmer Agency under the SLPS," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 22(2), pages 1-15, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:22:y:2026:i:2:p:15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/download/0/0/53055/57851
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ccsenet.org/journal/index.php/ass/article/view/0/53055
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • R00 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - General - - - General
    • Z0 - Other Special Topics - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibn:assjnl:v:22:y:2026:i:2:p:15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Canadian Center of Science and Education (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cepflch.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.