IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/ibf/beaccr/v5y2013i1p41-51.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Applied Project Learning Outcomes: Differences Between United States And International Students

Author

Listed:
  • Robert D. Green
  • Farideh A. Farazmand

Abstract

The presence of international students on college campuses has been a significant source of cultural diversity and globalization of college campuses. Therefore, determining factors for successful learning experiences of international students on American campuses could result in better recruitment strategies. This paper investigates the learning experiences of students in applied project courses and compares learning outcomes of international and the U.S. students in applied courses. Results show positive impacts of applied project courses on students’ learning outcomes with better results for international students.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert D. Green & Farideh A. Farazmand, 2013. "Applied Project Learning Outcomes: Differences Between United States And International Students," Business Education and Accreditation, The Institute for Business and Finance Research, vol. 5(1), pages 41-51.
    • Handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:41-51
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/beaccr/bea-v5n1-2013/BEA-V5N1-2013-4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Applied Projects; Learning Outcomes; Global Business Education;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • I21 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Analysis of Education
    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • A22 - General Economics and Teaching - - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics - - - Undergraduate

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ibf:beaccr:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:41-51. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mercedes Jalbert (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.