IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/iaf/journl/y2019i2p164-172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Metallurgical Enterprises Performance Indicators in the Context of the Corporate Social Responsibility Model Implementation

Author

Listed:
  • Hanna Yangol

    (Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman, Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

The performance of a separate metallurgical enterprise depends, on the one hand, from the industry-wide development and changes in the economic situation at both the state and global levels, and, secondly, from the correct management decisions on the development strategy to achieve the desired results. The management system to ensure the high performance of the metallurgical enterprise should be based on the principles of continuous improvement with the development of modern tools for measurement and ensuring the highest possible results. It should be the single integrated model that allows determine the key competitive advantages. In addition to the choice of such an optimal system, it is necessary to determine the trajectory of improvement with the phased design of its implementation and use. The purpose of the article is to determine the improvement direction of the system of the strategic management indicators of metallurgical enterprises based on the detailed description of the implementation of the integrated corporate social responsibility model. Based on the analysis of the full range of existing management systems and measurement models, the author proposed to consider the implementation of the integrated management system like SURE BPMS life cycle excellent (SBLCE) integrated strategy. The central element of this model is the design, implementation, use, review and re-evaluation of key strategic performance indicators based on the principles of corporate responsibility and sustainable development. The structure was formed and the directions of socially responsible performance management of the metallurgical enterprise were determined. The set of potential key indicators of strategic performance (KPI) of the industry was proposed. It was revealed that building a system of KPI is quite a creative process that requires an immediate response to the situation both inside the enterprise and in its relationship with the external environment. Each stage of SBLCE implementation was described in detail and graphically reflected.

Suggested Citation

  • Hanna Yangol, 2019. "Metallurgical Enterprises Performance Indicators in the Context of the Corporate Social Responsibility Model Implementation," Oblik i finansi, Institute of Accounting and Finance, issue 2, pages 164-172, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2019:i:2:p:164-172
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/pdf/670-indikatori-rezultativnosti-metalurgiynih-pidpriemstv-u-konteksti-vprovadzhennya-modeli-korporativnoi-socialnoi-vidpovidalnosti.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://www.afj.org.ua/en/article/670/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    strategic performance; KPI life cycle; sustainable development; performance measurement system; corporate responsibility; metallurgical enterprise;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D91 - Microeconomics - - Micro-Based Behavioral Economics - - - Role and Effects of Psychological, Emotional, Social, and Cognitive Factors on Decision Making
    • L21 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Business Objectives of the Firm
    • L61 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Manufacturing - - - Metals and Metal Products; Cement; Glass; Ceramics
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility
    • M21 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Economics - - - Business Economics
    • M41 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Accounting - - - Accounting

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:iaf:journl:y:2019:i:2:p:164-172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Serhiy Ostapchuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iafkvua.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.