IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/hit/ecorev/v22y1971i2p134-149.html

Towards the Theory of Endogenous Technological Progress

Author

Listed:
  • Kiyokawa, Yukihiko

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kiyokawa, Yukihiko, 1971. "Towards the Theory of Endogenous Technological Progress," Economic Review, Hitotsubashi University, vol. 22(2), pages 134-149, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:hit:ecorev:v:22:y:1971:i:2:p:134-149
    DOI: 10.15057/23936
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://hit-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2039955/files/keizaikenkyu02202134.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15057/23936?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacob Schmookler, 1962. "Changes in Industry and in the State of Knowledge as Determinants of Industrial Invention," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 195-232, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Fellner, William, 1970. "Trends in the Activities Generating Technological Progress," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 60(1), pages 1-29, March.
    3. Kenneth Arrow, 1962. "Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 609-626, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    4. Murray Brown, 1967. "The Theory and Empirical Analysis of Production," NBER Books, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc, number brow67-1, August.
    5. Nordhaus, William D, 1969. "An Economic Theory of Technological Change," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 18-28, May.
    6. Jora R. Minasian, 1962. "The Economics of Research and Development," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 93-142, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    7. Minasian, Jora R, 1969. "Research and Development, Production Functions, and Rates of Return," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 59(2), pages 80-85, May.
    8. Richard R. Nelson, 1959. "The Economics of Invention: A Survey of the Literature," The Journal of Business, University of Chicago Press, vol. 32, pages 101-101.
    9. E. S. Phelps, 1966. "Models of Technical Progress and the Golden Rule of Research," The Review of Economic Studies, Review of Economic Studies Ltd, vol. 33(2), pages 133-145.
    10. Burmeister, Edwin & Chang, Winston W & Dobell, Rodney, 1970. "The Role of Saving in a Growth Model with Induced Inventions: A Correction," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 52(4), pages 446-447, November.
    11. Conlisk, John, 1969. "A Neoclassical Growth Model with Endogenously Positioned Technical Change Frontier," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 79(314), pages 348-362, June.
    12. Kamien, Morton I & Schwartz, Nancy L, 1969. "Induced Factor Augmenting Technical Progress from a Microeconomic Viewpoint," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 37(4), pages 668-684, October.
    13. Burton Klein, 1962. "The Decision Making Problem in Development," NBER Chapters, in: The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, pages 477-508, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Karl Shell, 2010. "A Model of Inventive Activity and Capital Accumulation," Levine's Working Paper Archive 1409, David K. Levine.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jones, Charles I., 2005. "Growth and Ideas," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 16, pages 1063-1111, Elsevier.
    2. Schneider, Johannes & Ziesemer, Thomas, 1994. "What's New and What's Old in New Growth Theory: Endogenous Technology, Microfoundation, and Growth Rate Predictions," MPRA Paper 56132, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    3. Shah, Anwar & DEC, 1994. "The economics of research and development : how research and development capital affects production and markets and is affected by tax incentives," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1325, The World Bank.
    4. Charles I. Jones, "undated". "Population and Ideas: A Theory of Endogenous Growth," Working Papers 98014, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
    5. Gersbach, Hans & Schneider, Maik & Schneller, Olivier, 2010. "Optimal Mix of Applied and Basic Research, Distance to Frontier, and Openness," CEPR Discussion Papers 7795, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Taalbi, Josef, 2017. "What drives innovation? Evidence from economic history," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 46(8), pages 1437-1453.
    7. Francesco Crespi & Claudia Ghisetti & Francesco Quatraro, 2015. "Environmental and innovation policies for the evolution of green technologies: a survey and a test," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 5(2), pages 343-370, December.
    8. Esubalew Tiruneh, 2014. "Regional Economic Development in Italy: Applying the Creative Class Thesis to a Test," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 5(1), pages 19-36, March.
    9. Maria Rosaria Carillo & Erasmo Papagni, 2004. "Academic Research, Social Interactions And Economic Growth," Working Papers 10_2004, D.E.S. (Department of Economic Studies), University of Naples "Parthenope", Italy.
    10. Tunde Angela Siladi-Kinter, 2015. "Techological Creativity And Economic Development," Annals of Faculty of Economics, University of Oradea, Faculty of Economics, vol. 1(2), pages 758-765, December.
    11. Thirtle, Colin, 1986. "The Production Function Approach to the Relationship Between Productivity Growth and R & D," Manchester Working Papers in Agricultural Economics 232791, University of Manchester, School of Economics, Agricultural Economics Department.
    12. Steff De Visscher & Markus Eberhardt & Gerdie Everaert, 2017. "Measuring productivity and absorptive capacity evolution," Discussion Papers 2017-11, University of Nottingham, GEP.
    13. Hall, Bronwyn H. & Rosenberg, Nathan, 2010. "Introduction to the Handbook," Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, in: Bronwyn H. Hall & Nathan Rosenberg (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, edition 1, volume 1, chapter 0, pages 3-9, Elsevier.
    14. Daniele Archibugi & Roberto Simonetti, 1998. "Objects and Subjects in Technological Interdependence. Towards a Framework to Monitor Innovation," International Journal of the Economics of Business, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 5(3), pages 295-309.
    15. Sefa Awaworyi Churchill & Hoang M. Luong & Mehmet Ugur, 2022. "Does intellectual property protection deliver economic benefits? A multi‐outcome meta‐regression analysis of the evidence," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(5), pages 1477-1509, December.
    16. Rasmus Arler Bogetoft & Peter Bogetoft, 2022. "Market entrance, patents, and preliminary injunctions: a model of pharmaceutical patent litigation," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 53(3), pages 379-423, June.
    17. Bruton HJ., 1979. "On the production of appropriate technology," ILO Working Papers 991822923402676, International Labour Organization.
    18. Yang, Haodong & Zhang, Yumei & Wang, Gaofeng & Liu, Li, 2025. "Intellectual property governance and academic technology transfer," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    19. Gaoju Yang & Yilu Zhang & Xiao Yu, 2020. "Intellectual property rights and the upgrading of the global value chain status," Pacific Economic Review, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 25(2), pages 185-204, May.
    20. Guo, Di & Guo, Yan & Jiang, Kun, 2018. "Governance and effects of public R&D subsidies: Evidence from China," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 74, pages 18-31.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:hit:ecorev:v:22:y:1971:i:2:p:134-149. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Digital Resources Section, Hitotsubashi University Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iehitjp.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.