IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v9y2017i2p243-d89866.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characterization of the Microbial Communities in Rumen Fluid Inoculated Reactors for the Biogas Digestion of Wheat Straw

Author

Listed:
  • Ke Li

    (College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China
    Water Affairs Research Institute, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China)

  • Haoran Zhu

    (College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China)

  • Yajie Zhang

    (College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China)

  • Hongxun Zhang

    (College of Resources and Environment, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 101408, China)

Abstract

The present study investigated the effect of rumen fluid (RF) concentration on the methane production through anaerobic digestion of wheat straw in batch mode, and compared the microbial communities in RF and RF inoculated reactors by 16S rRNA genes sequencing. Six levels of RF concentration including 1%, 5%, 10%, 15%, 20% and 25% ( v / v ) were used in reactors R1, R5, R10, R15, R20 and R25 respectively. The results revealed that lower than or equal to 5% RF concentrations resulted in reactor acidification and low methane production. The highest methane yield of 106 mL CH 4 g VS −1 was achieved in R10, whereas higher RF concentrations than 10% could not improve the methane production significantly. Methanosarcina barkeri was abundant in the well-working reactors, and Methanobacterium was dominant in the poor-working reactors, implying the archaeal communities in reactors had changed greatly from the Methanobrevibacter -dominated RF. Although the relative abundance of Clostridium and Ruminococcus were greatly different between RF and reactors, the Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes communities were dominant in all the tested samples. The results indicated that the in vitro anaerobic conditions had altered the rumen methanogenic communities significantly and the facultative acetoclastic Methanosarcina was important for the methane production in the RF seeded reactors.

Suggested Citation

  • Ke Li & Haoran Zhu & Yajie Zhang & Hongxun Zhang, 2017. "Characterization of the Microbial Communities in Rumen Fluid Inoculated Reactors for the Biogas Digestion of Wheat Straw," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-14, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:243-:d:89866
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/243/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/9/2/243/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Xiaohua & Zhang, YaLei & Gu, Yu & Liu, Zhanguang & Shen, Zheng & Chu, Huaqiang & Zhou, Xuefei, 2014. "Enhancing methane production from rice straw by extrusion pretreatment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 34-41.
    2. Merlin Christy, P. & Gopinath, L.R. & Divya, D., 2014. "A review on anaerobic decomposition and enhancement of biogas production through enzymes and microorganisms," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 167-173.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Elvira E. Ziganshina & Svetlana S. Bulynina & Ayrat M. Ziganshin, 2022. "Impact of Granular Activated Carbon on Anaerobic Process and Microbial Community Structure during Mesophilic and Thermophilic Anaerobic Digestion of Chicken Manure," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-20, January.
    2. Meng, Xingyao & Wang, Qingping & Zhao, Xixi & Cai, Yafan & Ma, Xuguang & Fu, Jingyi & Wang, Pan & Wang, Yongjing & Liu, Wei & Ren, Lianhai, 2023. "A review of the technologies used for preserving anaerobic digestion inoculum," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Abdeshahian, Peyman & Lim, Jeng Shiun & Ho, Wai Shin & Hashim, Haslenda & Lee, Chew Tin, 2016. "Potential of biogas production from farm animal waste in Malaysia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 714-723.
    2. Wang, Ping & Liu, Chaoqi & Chang, Juan & Yin, Qingqiang & Huang, Weiwei & Liu, Yang & Dang, Xiaowei & Gao, Tianzeng & Lu, Fushan, 2019. "Effect of physicochemical pretreatments plus enzymatic hydrolysis on the composition and morphologic structure of corn straw," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 502-508.
    3. Coimbra, Michelle Cardoso & Duque, Aleta & Saéz, Felicia & Manzanares, Paloma & Garcia-Cruz, Crispin Humberto & Ballesteros, Mercedes, 2016. "Sugar production from wheat straw biomass by alkaline extrusion and enzymatic hydrolysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1060-1068.
    4. Baruah, Debendra Chandra & Enweremadu, Christopher Chintua, 2019. "Prospects of decentralized renewable energy to improve energy access: A resource-inventory-based analysis of South Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 328-341.
    5. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    6. Granada, Camille E. & Hasan, Camila & Marder, Munique & Konrad, Odorico & Vargas, Luciano K. & Passaglia, Luciane M.P. & Giongo, Adriana & de Oliveira, Rafael R. & Pereira, Leandro de M. & de Jesus Tr, 2018. "Biogas from slaughterhouse wastewater anaerobic digestion is driven by the archaeal family Methanobacteriaceae and bacterial families Porphyromonadaceae and Tissierellaceae," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 840-846.
    7. Pérez-Rodríguez, N. & García-Bernet, D. & Domínguez, J.M., 2017. "Extrusion and enzymatic hydrolysis as pretreatments on corn cob for biogas production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 597-603.
    8. Tonanzi, B. & Gallipoli, A. & Gianico, A. & Montecchio, D. & Pagliaccia, P. & Rossetti, S. & Braguglia, C.M., 2021. "Elucidating the key factors in semicontinuous anaerobic digestion of urban biowaste: The crucial role of sludge addition in process stability, microbial community enrichment and methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 272-284.
    9. Shirkavand, Ehsan & Baroutian, Saeid & Gapes, Daniel J. & Young, Brent R., 2016. "Combination of fungal and physicochemical processes for lignocellulosic biomass pretreatment – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 217-234.
    10. Di Maria, Francesco & Sisani, Federico & Lasagni, Marzio & Borges, Marisa Soares & Gonzales, Thiago H., 2018. "Replacement of energy crops with bio-waste in existing anaerobic digestion plants: An energetic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 202-213.
    11. Ndayisenga, Fabrice & Yu, Zhisheng & Zheng, Jianzhong & Wang, Bobo & Liang, Hongxia & Phulpoto, Irfan Ali & Habiyakare, Telesphore & Zhou, Dandan, 2021. "Microbial electrohydrogenesis cell and dark fermentation integrated system enhances biohydrogen production from lignocellulosic agricultural wastes: Substrate pretreatment towards optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    12. Dell’Omo, Pier Paolo & Spena, Vincenzo Andrea, 2020. "Mechanical pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass to improve biogas production: Comparison of results for giant reed and wheat straw," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Budzianowski, Wojciech M., 2016. "A review of potential innovations for production, conditioning and utilization of biogas with multiple-criteria assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1148-1171.
    14. Trivedi, Abhinav & Verma, Amit Ranjan & Kaur, Supreet & Jha, Bhaskar & Vijay, Vandit & Chandra, Ram & Vijay, Virendra Kumar & Subbarao, P.M.V. & Tiwari, Ratnesh & Hariprasad, P. & Prasad, Rajendra, 2017. "Sustainable bio-energy production models for eradicating open field burning of paddy straw in Punjab, India," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 310-317.
    15. Tabatabaei, Meisam & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Valijanian, Elena & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Ghanavati, Hossein & Sulaiman, Alawi & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Karimi, Keikhosr, 2020. "A comprehensive review on recent biological innovations to improve biogas production, Part 1: Upstream strategies," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 1204-1220.
    16. Ao, Tianjie & Chen, Lin & Zhou, Pan & Liu, Xiaofeng & Li, Dong, 2021. "The role of oxidation-reduction potential as an early warning indicator, and a microbial instability mechanism in a pilot-scale anaerobic mesophilic digestion of chicken manure," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 223-232.
    17. Ganzoury, Mohamed A. & Allam, Nageh K., 2015. "Impact of nanotechnology on biogas production: A mini-review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 1392-1404.
    18. Giulia Grisolia & Debora Fino & Umberto Lucia, 2022. "Biomethanation of Rice Straw: A Sustainable Perspective for the Valorisation of a Field Residue in the Energy Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-22, May.
    19. Divya, D. & Gopinath, L.R. & Merlin Christy, P., 2015. "A review on current aspects and diverse prospects for enhancing biogas production in sustainable means," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 690-699.
    20. Zealand, A.M. & Roskilly, A.P. & Graham, D.W., 2017. "Effect of feeding frequency and organic loading rate on biomethane production in the anaerobic digestion of rice straw," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 156-165.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:9:y:2017:i:2:p:243-:d:89866. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.