IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4201-d1650255.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pursuing Ecological and Social Co-Benefits: Public Hierarchical Willingness for Biodiversity Conservation in Urban Parks

Author

Listed:
  • Minli Jin

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

  • Lihui Hu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Guang Hu

    (School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China)

  • Jing Guo

    (College of Landscape Architecture, Zhejiang A & F University, Hangzhou 311300, China)

Abstract

Urban green spaces play a critical role in sustaining the urban park biodiversity. The relationship between biodiversity and city residents is complex. Understanding the cognitive preferences of residents toward biodiversity is vital for effective conservation. This study investigated the public willingness to protect the biodiversity in urban parks using questionnaire-based assessments and explored the underlying drivers. The study focused on the residents of Hangzhou, China, and analyzed the effects of respondent and visit characteristics as well as their interactions using ANOVA, PERMANOVA, GLM, and NMDS. The visitor age, education level, satisfaction with plant landscapes, and visit frequency significantly influenced their willingness to conserve. Based on a “cognitive-experience-investment” framework, we uncovered (1) positive synergistic effects between urban park biodiversity and the abundance of urban green space fauna; (2) threshold constraints linking volunteer time for biodiversity conservation and economic expenditures on biodiversity-friendly products; and (3) the complex interactions among these factors. The findings not only elucidate the driving mechanisms and model optimization pathways associated with public willingness for conserving urban biodiversity but also provide actionable strategies to promote both ecological conservation and societal wellbeing.

Suggested Citation

  • Minli Jin & Lihui Hu & Guang Hu & Jing Guo, 2025. "Pursuing Ecological and Social Co-Benefits: Public Hierarchical Willingness for Biodiversity Conservation in Urban Parks," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-19, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4201-:d:1650255
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4201/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4201/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Esbjörn Ohlsson, 2008. "Combining generalized linear models and credibility models in practice," Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 2008(4), pages 301-314.
    2. Chang Lu & Katsuya Tanaka & Qulin Shen, 2024. "Residents’ Preferences on Green Infrastructure in Wuhan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-19, November.
    3. Jacob Hörisch & Lars Petersen & Kathleen Jacobs, 2024. "The impact of biodiversity information on willingness to pay," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 28(6), pages 1641-1656, December.
    4. Sattout, E.J. & Talhouk, S.N. & Caligari, P.D.S., 2007. "Economic value of cedar relics in Lebanon: An application of contingent valuation method for conservation," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(2-3), pages 315-322, March.
    5. Christmas Uchiyama & Kaoru Ichikawa & Osamu Saito, 2024. "Exploring Landscape Values and Willingness to Pay for Perceived Ecosystem Services: The Case of Malampaya Sound, a Socio-Ecological Production Landscape and Seascape," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(8), pages 1-21, April.
    6. Luu Quoc Dat & Shuo-Yan Chou & Pham Minh Tam & Nguyen Thi Hue & Pham Thu Thuy, 2024. "Factors Influencing Residents’ Willingness to Pay for Mangrove Forest Environmental Services in Phu Long, Vietnam," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, August.
    7. Torres-Miralles, M. & Grammatikopoulou, I. & Rescia, A.J., 2017. "Employing contingent and inferred valuation methods to evaluate the conservation of olive groves and associated ecosystem services in Andalusia (Spain)," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 26(PA), pages 258-269.
    8. Nelder, J.A. & Verrall, R.J., 1997. "Credibility Theory and Generalized Linear Models," ASTIN Bulletin, Cambridge University Press, vol. 27(1), pages 71-82, May.
    9. Julia Bronnmann & Veronika Liebelt & Fabian Marder & Jasper Meya & Martin Quaas, 2023. "The Value of Naturalness of Urban Green Spaces: Evidence from a Discrete Choice Experiment," Land Economics, University of Wisconsin Press, vol. 99(4), pages 528-542.
    10. Sardana, Kavita, 2019. "Tourists' Willingness to Pay for Restoration of Traditional Agro-forest Ecosystems Providing Biodiversity: Evidence from India," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 362-372.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Otrachshenko, Vladimir & Tyurina, Elena & Nagapetyan, Artur, 2022. "The economic value of the Glass Beach: Contingent valuation and life satisfaction approaches," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    2. Furman, Edward & Landsman, Zinoviy, 2010. "Multivariate Tweedie distributions and some related capital-at-risk analyses," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 46(2), pages 351-361, April.
    3. Landsman, Zinoviy, 2002. "Credibility theory: a new view from the theory of second order optimal statistics," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 30(3), pages 351-362, June.
    4. Van Oijstaeijen, Wito & Van Passel, Steven & Back, Phil & Cools, Jan, 2022. "The politics of green infrastructure: A discrete choice experiment with Flemish local decision-makers," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    5. Nicholas Tyack & Milan Ščasný, 2018. "Social Valuation of Genebank Activities: Assessing Public Demand for Genetic Resource Conservation in the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-19, November.
    6. Anastasija Novikova & Lucia Rocchi & Bernardas Vaznonis, 2019. "Valuing Agricultural Landscape: Lithuanian Case Study Using a Contingent Valuation Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-13, May.
    7. Dani Aoun, 2015. "Who pays more to preserve a natural reserve, visitors or locals? A confidence analysis of a contingent valuation application," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 17(4), pages 471-486, October.
    8. Egor Selivanov & Petra Hlaváčková, 2021. "Methods for monetary valuation of ecosystem services: A scoping review," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 67(11), pages 499-511.
    9. Cheng-Te Lin & Yu-Sheng Huang & Lu-Wen Liao & Chung-Te Ting, 2020. "Measuring Consumer Willingness to Pay to Reduce Health Risks of Contracting Dengue Fever," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, March.
    10. Alamanos, Angelos & Koundouri, Phoebe, 2022. "Economics of Incorporating Ecosystem Services into Water Resource Planning and Management," MPRA Paper 122046, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Lo, Chi Ho & Fung, Wing Kam & Zhu, Zhong Yi, 2006. "Generalized estimating equations for variance and covariance parameters in regression credibility models," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 99-113, August.
    12. Halkos, George E & Aslanidis, Panagiotis-Stavros & Landis, Conrad & Papadaki, Lydia & Koundouri, Phoebe, 2024. "A review on primary and cascading hazards by exploring individuals’ willingness-to-pay for urban sustainability policies," MPRA Paper 122262, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Yu Gan & Tao Xu & NengRui Xu & JiLv Xu & Dan Qiao, 2021. "How Environmental Awareness and Knowledge Affect Urban Residents’ Willingness to Participate in Rubber Plantation Ecological Restoration Programs: Evidence from Hainan, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Antonio Alberto Rodríguez Sousa & Claudia Tribaldos-Anda & Sergio A. Prats & Clarisse Brígido & José Muñoz-Rojas & Alejandro J. Rescia, 2022. "Impacts of Fertilization on Environmental Quality across a Gradient of Olive Grove Management Systems in Alentejo (Portugal)," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-19, December.
    15. Hyun No Kim & Hwanhee Ryu, 2022. "Estimating the Economic Value of Change in Ecosystem Habitat Quality in South Korea Using an Integrated Environmental and Economic Analysis," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Alicja Wolny-Dominiak & Tomasz Żądło, 2021. "The Measures of Accuracy of Claim Frequency Credibility Predictor," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-13, October.
    17. Tadesse Tolera, 2022. "The economic valuation of Gedo Natural Forest conservation benefits, Ethiopia," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Xacur, Oscar Alberto Quijano & Garrido, José, 2018. "Bayesian credibility for GLMs," Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 180-189.
    19. Jonas Heckenhahn & Moritz A. Drupp, 2024. "Relative Price Changes of Ecosystem Services: Evidence from Germany," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 87(3), pages 833-880, March.
    20. Agus Purwoko & Dodik Ridho Nurrochmat & Meti Ekayani & Syamsu Rijal & Herlina Leontin Garura, 2022. "Examining the Economic Value of Tourism and Visitor Preferences: A Portrait of Sustainability Ecotourism in the Tangkahan Protection Area, Gunung Leuser National Park, North Sumatra, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-14, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4201-:d:1650255. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.