Author
Listed:
- Francielle Rodrigues de Oliveira
(Department of Forest and Wood Sciences, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, Brazil)
- Roberto Avelino Cecílio
(Department of Forest and Wood Sciences, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, Brazil)
- Sidney Sara Zanetti
(Department of Forest and Wood Sciences, Federal University of Espírito Santo, Jerônimo Monteiro 29550-000, Brazil)
Abstract
This study adapted the Socioenvironmental Vulnerability Index (SEVI) for rural communities in Espírito Santo, Brazil, considering climatic, environmental and social factors. The analysis included using an integration of indices, such as the Environmental Vulnerability Index (EnVuIn) and the Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). The inclusion of variables, such as the Water Quality Index (WQI), the percentage of conflicting use of Permanent Preservation Areas (PPAs) and the existence of water reservoirs, presented new elements that directly influence environmental vulnerability. The results indicate significant human interference in PPAs with high rates of conflicting use, especially in the communities of Boa Esperança (85.8%) and José Marcos (85.4%). The absence of water reservoirs proved to be a critical factor for the water security of the communities. Communities such as Novo Sonho presented high poverty rates, reflecting a high SVI (0.61). The EnVuIn indicated high environmental vulnerability in the communities of Boa Esperança, Santa Clara, Ita, Novo Sonho and Monte Alegre. Integrating the indicators and adapting the methodology resulted in a high SEVI for most communities, with emphasis on Novo Sonho and Boa Esperança (0.54), classified as very high. The study reinforces the need for public policies to reduce socioenvironmental risks and promote sustainability in rural communities.
Suggested Citation
Francielle Rodrigues de Oliveira & Roberto Avelino Cecílio & Sidney Sara Zanetti, 2025.
"Socioenvironmental Vulnerability of Rural Communities in Espírito Santo, Brazil,"
Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-32, April.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4054-:d:1646781
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4054-:d:1646781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.