IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p4028-d1646062.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Towards an Explicit Understanding of Network Governance in Urban Forestry Management: A Case Study of Portland (OR), USA

Author

Listed:
  • Quadri Olatunbosun Taiwo

    (Department of Geography, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201-0751, USA)

  • Vivek Shandas

    (Department of Geography, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201-0751, USA)

Abstract

As the climate continues to warm, and municipal leaders look for cost-effective and timely approaches to urban sustainability, one increasingly sought-out approach is the use of tree canopy to cool neighborhoods. Despite widespread efforts to expand tree canopy in cities, an overwhelming body of evidence suggests that urban green space is declining across the U.S., yet little is known about the factors that propel these changes. Understanding the institutional and governance systems can help identify the opportunities for slow consistent declines. Using social network analysis (SNA) metrics, we examined stakeholder roles in power structures and decision-making processes within Portland, Oregon’s urban forest management. Our results reveal a highly decentralized urban forestry network (density = 0.0079), with weak cohesion (5.4%) among 162 stakeholders. Moving forward, while network governance may face obstacles from conflicting interests among community and interagency groups, transforming governance models at all levels will require developing periodic, collaborative urban forestry management plans to address nature-based planning challenges. These planning documents should strongly emphasize not only the prioritization of tree equity-related ordinances but also the optimization of eco-literacy and awareness through virtual reality (VR) technology. As a novel approach, immersive simulations demonstrate practical potential for showcasing urban forestry benefits in network governance outreach and consensus-building.

Suggested Citation

  • Quadri Olatunbosun Taiwo & Vivek Shandas, 2025. "Towards an Explicit Understanding of Network Governance in Urban Forestry Management: A Case Study of Portland (OR), USA," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4028-:d:1646062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4028/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/4028/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Eleni Oikonomaki & Ilektra Papadaki & Christina Kakderi, 2024. "Promoting Green Transformations through Smart Engagement: An Assessment of 100 Citizen-Led Urban Greening Projects," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-20, April.
    2. YunJae Ock & Vivek Shandas & Fernanda Ribeiro & Noah Young, 2024. "Drivers of Tree Canopy Loss in a Mid-Sized Growing City: Case Study in Portland, OR (USA)," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, February.
    3. John T. Scholz & Cheng‐Lung Wang, 2006. "Cooptation or Transformation? Local Policy Networks and Federal Regulatory Enforcement," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(1), pages 81-97, January.
    4. Atefeh Tamaskani Esfehankalateh & Jack Ngarambe & Geun Young Yun, 2021. "Influence of Tree Canopy Coverage and Leaf Area Density on Urban Heat Island Mitigation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-14, July.
    5. Kim, Jooho & Hastak, Makarand, 2018. "Social network analysis: Characteristics of online social networks after a disaster," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 38(1), pages 86-96.
    6. Kukkonen, M.O. & Khamis, M. & Muhammad, M.J. & Käyhkö, N. & Luoto, M., 2022. "Modeling direct above-ground carbon loss due to urban expansion in Zanzibar City Region, Tanzania," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Brown, Philip & Roper, Simon, 2017. "Innovation and networks in New Zealand farming," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 61(3), July.
    2. Yonit Rusho & Daphne Ruth Raban & David Simantov & Gilad Ravid, 2025. "Knowledge Sharing in Security-Sensitive Communities," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, March.
    3. Cano-Marin, Enrique & Mora-Cantallops, Marçal & Sánchez-Alonso, Salvador, 2023. "Twitter as a predictive system: A systematic literature review," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    4. Li, Shuoshuo & Liu, Yaobin & Wei, Guoen & Bi, Mo & He, Bao-Jie, 2024. "Carbon surplus or carbon deficit under land use transformation in China?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    5. John T. Scholz & Cheng‐Lung Wang, 2009. "Learning to Cooperate: Learning Networks and the Problem of Altruism," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 53(3), pages 572-587, July.
    6. William D. Berry & Jacqueline H. R. DeMeritt & Justin Esarey, 2010. "Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential?," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 54(1), pages 248-266, January.
    7. Christopher Cvitanovic & Marie F Löf & Albert V Norström & Mark S Reed, 2018. "Building university-based boundary organisations that facilitate impacts on environmental policy and practice," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(9), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Dong Liu & Yu Peng Zhu, 2023. "Evolution of Knowledge Structure in an Emerging Field Based on a Triple Helix Model: the Case of Smart Factory," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(4), pages 4583-4607, December.
    9. Muhammad Ashraf Fauzi, 2023. "Social media in disaster management: review of the literature and future trends through bibliometric analysis," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 118(2), pages 953-975, September.
    10. Peng Liu & Liang Gui & Huirong Wang & Muhammad Riaz, 2022. "A Two-Stage Deep-Learning Model for Link Prediction Based on Network Structure and Node Attributes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-15, December.
    11. Yutian Zhuang & Dixiang Xie & Xijun Yu, 2023. "Urban Tree Canopy and Environmental Justice: Examining the Distributional Equity of Urban Tree Canopy in Guangzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-14, February.
    12. Chu Li & Wenjin Shen, 2024. "How to Perceive National Governance Networks in the Global Commons of the Earth’s Surface: A Case Study of the Antarctic," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Abhinav Kumar & Jyoti Prakash Singh & Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana, 2022. "A deep multi-modal neural network for informative Twitter content classification during emergencies," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 319(1), pages 791-822, December.
    14. Turgut Acikara & Bo Xia & Tan Yigitcanlar & Carol Hon, 2023. "Contribution of Social Media Analytics to Disaster Response Effectiveness: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-50, May.
    15. Sarah E. Anderson & Andrew J. Plantinga & Matthew Wibbenmeyer, 2022. "Unequal Treatments: Federal Wildfire Fuels Projects and Socioeconomic Status of Nearby Communities," NBER Chapters, in: Environmental and Energy Policy and the Economy, volume 4, pages 177-201, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    16. Feng, Xinhui & Wang, Sensen & Li, Yan & Yang, Jiayu & Lei, Kaige & Yuan, Weikang, 2024. "Spatial heterogeneity and driving mechanisms of carbon emissions in urban expansion areas: A research framework coupled with patterns and functions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    17. Michael Rudolph & Mashford Zenda, 2025. "The Contribution of Agroecology to Smart Cities and Different Settlement Contexts in South Africa—An Analytical Review," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-15, March.
    18. Zhe Gao & Jianming Ye & Xianwei Zhu & Miaomiao Li & Haijiang Wang & Mengmeng Zhu, 2024. "Characteristics of Spatial Correlation Network Structure and Carbon Balance Zoning of Land Use Carbon Emission in the Tarim River Basin," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, November.
    19. Zhou, Wei & Chen, Yan & Chen, Jin, 2022. "Risk spread in multiple energy markets: Extreme volatility spillover network analysis before and during the COVID-19 pandemic," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 256(C).
    20. Stergios Koutsanitis & Maria Sinou & Zoe Kanetaki & Evgenia Tousi & George Varelidis, 2025. "Thermal Performance Investigation in Historical Urban Neighborhoods Using ENVI-Met Simulation Software," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-33, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:4028-:d:1646062. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.