IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i9p3799-d1640540.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Occupancy Evaluation of a Passive Multi-Unit Residential Building and a Single-Family Passive House

Author

Listed:
  • Anthony Mach

    (Department of Building Science, Algonquin College Center for Construction Excellence, Ottawa, ON K2G 1V8, Canada)

  • Maria Parra

    (Faculty of Aviation, Trades, and Technology, Canadore College of Applied Arts and Technology, North Bay, ON P1B 8K9, Canada)

  • Hebatallah Teamah

    (Department of Building Science, Algonquin College Center for Construction Excellence, Ottawa, ON K2G 1V8, Canada)

Abstract

Passive buildings are increasing in popularity in Canada. This paper examines two passive buildings initially constructed in the past decade: the Peterborough passive multi-unit residential building (MURB) and the Wolfe Island single-family dwelling. A post-occupancy evaluation was performed on the buildings. The buildings were modelled in HOT2000 and the Passive House Planning Package (PHPP) to ensure the validity of the results. The energy bills were collected from the building owners to acquire the real-time consumption of the buildings. The models have shown a good agreement with the collected data. Furthermore, data loggers were installed in both buildings for indoor temperature monitoring to ensure that they adhere to the passive house explicit criteria. Internal gains, shading, and orientation were analyzed to assess their effect on heating and cooling loads. Peterborough MURB has shown more energy-saving potential compared to the Wolfe Island passive house. Heating load reduction has been compared, more than five times, to the cooling load reduction potential. The reduction in GHG emissions can be up to 39% when passive house parameters are applied to the Wolfe Island house. This paper has shown the potential of the passive house in relation to sustainable buildings in Northern climates.

Suggested Citation

  • Anthony Mach & Maria Parra & Hebatallah Teamah, 2025. "Post-Occupancy Evaluation of a Passive Multi-Unit Residential Building and a Single-Family Passive House," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-25, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3799-:d:1640540
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3799/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/9/3799/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rouleau, Jean & Gosselin, Louis & Blanchet, Pierre, 2018. "Understanding energy consumption in high-performance social housing buildings: A case study from Canada," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 677-690.
    2. Schnieders, Jurgen & Hermelink, Andreas, 2006. "CEPHEUS results: measurements and occupants' satisfaction provide evidence for Passive Houses being an option for sustainable building," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 151-171, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Molinari, Marco & Anund Vogel, Jonas & Rolando, Davide & Lundqvist, Per, 2023. "Using living labs to tackle innovation bottlenecks: the KTH Live-In Lab case study," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 338(C).
    2. Sirkka Koskela & Tuomas Mattila & Riina Antikainen & Ilmo Mäenpää, 2013. "Identifying Key Sectors and Measures for a Transition towards a Low Resource Economy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 2(3), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Wang, Ran & Lu, Shilei & Feng, Wei, 2020. "A three-stage optimization methodology for envelope design of passive house considering energy demand, thermal comfort and cost," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    4. Allard, I. & Olofsson, T. & Hassan, O.A.B., 2013. "Methods for energy analysis of residential buildings in Nordic countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 22(C), pages 306-318.
    5. Piccardo, C. & Dodoo, A. & Gustavsson, L. & Tettey, U.Y.A., 2020. "Retrofitting with different building materials: Life-cycle primary energy implications," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    6. Bai, Yefei & Yu, Cong & Pan, Wei, 2024. "Systematic examination of energy performance gap in low-energy buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    7. Forde, Joe & Hopfe, Christina J. & McLeod, Robert S. & Evins, Ralph, 2020. "Temporal optimization for affordable and resilient Passivhaus dwellings in the social housing sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    8. Shilei Lu & Minchao Fan & Yiqun Zhao, 2018. "A System to Pre-Evaluate the Suitability of Energy-Saving Technology for Green Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-19, October.
    9. Kylili, Angeliki & Ilic, Milos & Fokaides, Paris A., 2017. "Whole-building Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a passive house of the sub-tropical climatic zone," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 169-177.
    10. Maltais, Louis-Gabriel & Gosselin, Louis, 2021. "Predictability analysis of domestic hot water consumption with neural networks: From single units to large residential buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    11. Georges, L. & Massart, C. & Van Moeseke, G. & De Herde, A., 2012. "Environmental and economic performance of heating systems for energy-efficient dwellings: Case of passive and low-energy single-family houses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(C), pages 452-464.
    12. Soršak, Marko & Leskovar, Vesna Žegarac & Premrov, Miroslav & Goričanec, Darko & Pšunder, Igor, 2014. "Economical optimization of energy-efficient timber buildings: Case study for single family timber house in Slovenia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 57-65.
    13. Michaela Makešová & Michaela Valentová, 2021. "The Concept of Multiple Impacts of Renewable Energy Sources: A Critical Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, May.
    14. Ardeshir Mahdavi & Christiane Berger & Hadeer Amin & Eleni Ampatzi & Rune Korsholm Andersen & Elie Azar & Verena M. Barthelmes & Matteo Favero & Jakob Hahn & Dolaana Khovalyg & Henrik N. Knudsen & Ale, 2021. "The Role of Occupants in Buildings’ Energy Performance Gap: Myth or Reality?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-44, March.
    15. Audenaert, A. & De Cleyn, S.H. & Vankerckhove, B., 2008. "Economic analysis of passive houses and low-energy houses compared with standard houses," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(1), pages 47-55, January.
    16. Yvan Dutil & Daniel Rousse & Guillermo Quesada, 2011. "Sustainable Buildings: An Ever Evolving Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, February.
    17. Kyung-Yong Park & Deok-Oh Woo & Seung-Bok Leigh & Lars Junghans, 2022. "Impact of Hybrid Ventilation Strategies in Energy Savings of Buildings: In Regard to Mixed-Humid Climate Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, March.
    18. Razak Olu-Ajayi & Hafiz Alaka & Hakeem Owolabi & Lukman Akanbi & Sikiru Ganiyu, 2023. "Data-Driven Tools for Building Energy Consumption Prediction: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-20, March.
    19. Dodoo, Ambrose & Gustavsson, Leif & Sathre, Roger, 2010. "Life cycle primary energy implication of retrofitting a wood-framed apartment building to passive house standard," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(12), pages 1152-1160.
    20. Adrian Pitts, 2017. "Passive House and Low Energy Buildings: Barriers and Opportunities for Future Development within UK Practice," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-26, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:9:p:3799-:d:1640540. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.