IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3681-d1637807.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Analysis of e-methane in Japan and China

Author

Listed:
  • Ze Ran

    (Graduate School of Policy Science, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka 567-8570, Japan)

  • Weisheng Zhou

    (College of Policy Science, Ritsumeikan University, Osaka 567-8570, Japan)

Abstract

E-methane is considered the most important way to decarbonize the natural gas system in Japan. The advantage of e-methane is that it can use existing natural gas infrastructure and end-use facilities. There is a potential for China to produce e-methane and export it to Japan in the future. Therefore, the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and economic analysis of e-methane should be studied in both countries. The GHG emissions of e-methane are 0.927 kg-CO 2 e per kg e-methane if all processes are powered by solar energy. The largest portion of GHG emissions from e-methane comes from hydrogen, which comprises more than 85% if solar energy is used for all processes. When solar energy is used to produce hydrogen, but grid electricity is used for other processes, the GHG emissions exceed the Europe Union’s Renewable Liquid and Gaseous Transport Fuels of Non-Biological Origin (RFNBO) requirements, whether in Japan or in China. The levelized cost of e-methane produced in Japan is much higher than in China. The levelized cost of e-methane in Japan is 4489 USD/ton in the base case (2021), 2842 USD/ton in the 2030 case, and 1674 USD/ton in the 2050 case. In China, it is 2450 USD/ton, 1505 USD/ton, and 1082 USD/ton, respectively. The cost of hydrogen is the largest contributor to the levelized cost of e-methane, accounting for more than 60% in all cases. For China and Japan to cooperate in the value chain of e-methane, a carbon accounting mechanism and a carbon pricing mechanism mutually recognized by both Japan and China are necessary.

Suggested Citation

  • Ze Ran & Weisheng Zhou, 2025. "Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Economic Analysis of e-methane in Japan and China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-19, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3681-:d:1637807
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3681/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3681/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Viebahn & Alexander Scholz & Ole Zelt, 2019. "The Potential Role of Direct Air Capture in the German Energy Research Program—Results of a Multi-Dimensional Analysis," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-27, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Qian & Du, Caiyi & Zhang, Xueguang, 2024. "Direct air capture capacity configuration and cost allocation based on sharing mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    2. An, Keju & Farooqui, Azharuddin & McCoy, Sean T., 2022. "The impact of climate on solvent-based direct air capture systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    3. Thomas Deschamps & Mohamed Kanniche & Laurent Grandjean & Olivier Authier, 2022. "Modeling of Vacuum Temperature Swing Adsorption for Direct Air Capture Using Aspen Adsorption," Clean Technol., MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-18, April.
    4. Harrison, Nicholas & Herrera Jiménez, Juan & Krieger Merico, Luiz F. & Lorenzo, Santiago & Rondón Toro, Estefani & Rouse, Paul & Samaniego, Joseluis, 2023. "Nature-based solutions and carbon dioxide removal," Documentos de Proyectos 48691, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    5. Drechsler, Carsten & Agar, David W., 2020. "Intensified integrated direct air capture - power-to-gas process based on H2O and CO2 from ambient air," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    6. Balint Simon, 2023. "Material flows and embodied energy of direct air capture: A cradle‐to‐gate inventory of selected technologies," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 27(3), pages 646-661, June.
    7. Günther, Philipp & Ekardt, Felix, 2022. "Human Rights and Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal: Potential Limits to BECCS and DACCS Deployment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29.
    8. Matteo Micheli & Daniel Moore & Vanessa Bach & Matthias Finkbeiner, 2022. "Life-Cycle Assessment of Power-to-Liquid Kerosene Produced from Renewable Electricity and CO 2 from Direct Air Capture in Germany," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-21, August.
    9. Philipp Günther & Felix Ekardt, 2022. "Human Rights and Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal: Potential Limits to BECCS and DACCS Deployment," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29, November.
    10. Wahiba Yaïci & Evgueniy Entchev & Michela Longo, 2022. "Recent Advances in Small-Scale Carbon Capture Systems for Micro-Combined Heat and Power Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-30, April.
    11. Ikäheimo, Jussi & Weiss, Robert & Kiviluoma, Juha & Pursiheimo, Esa & Lindroos, Tomi J., 2022. "Impact of power-to-gas on the cost and design of the future low-carbon urban energy system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 305(C).
    12. Mukherjee, Agneev & Bruijnincx, Pieter & Junginger, Martin, 2023. "Techno-economic competitiveness of renewable fuel alternatives in the marine sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Enric Prats-Salvado & Nathalie Monnerie & Christian Sattler, 2021. "Synergies between Direct Air Capture Technologies and Solar Thermochemical Cycles in the Production of Methanol," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.
    14. Singh, Udayan & Colosi, Lisa M., 2021. "The case for estimating carbon return on investment (CROI) for CCUS platforms," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    15. Ikäheimo, Jussi & Lindroos, Tomi J. & Kiviluoma, Juha, 2023. "Impact of climate and geological storage potential on feasibility of hydrogen fuels," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3681-:d:1637807. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.