IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3450-d1633512.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of Google Earth Engine and Aggregated Air Quality Index for Monitoring and Mapping the Spatio-Temporal Air Quality to Improve Environmental Sustainability in Arid Regions

Author

Listed:
  • Abdel-rahman A. Mustafa

    (Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Sohag University, Sohag 82524, Egypt)

  • Mohamed S. Shokr

    (Soil and Water Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Tanta University, Tanta 31527, Egypt)

  • Talal Alharbi

    (Geology and Geophysics Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Elsayed A. Abdelsamie

    (National Authority for Remote Sensing and Space Sciences, Cairo 1564, Egypt)

  • Abdelbaset S. El-Sorogy

    (Geology and Geophysics Department, College of Science, King Saud University, P.O. Box 2455, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia)

  • Jose Emilio Meroño de Larriva

    (Department of Graphic Engineering and Geomatics, Campus de Rabanales, University of Cordoba, 14071 Cordoba, Spain)

Abstract

Egypt must present a more thorough and accurate picture of the state of the air, as this can contribute to better environmental and public health results. Hence, the goal of the current study is to map and track the spatiotemporal air quality over Egypt’s Qena Governorate using remote sensing data. The current investigation is considered a pioneering study and the first attempt to map the air quality index in the studied area. Multisource remote sensing data sets from the Google Earth Engine (GEE) were used to achieve this. The first is Sentinel-5P’s average annual satellite image data, which were gathered for four important pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO 2 ), nitrogen dioxide (NO 2 ), and ozone (O 3 ) over a six year period from 2019 to 2024. The second is the MODIS aerosol optical density (AOD) product satellite image data from the GEE platform, which calculate the average annual particulate matter (PM 2.5 and PM 10 ). All mentioned pollutant images were used to calculate the air quality index (AQI) and aggregated air quality index (AAQI). Lastly, we used Landsat’s average yearly land surface temperature (LST) retrieval (OLI/TIRS). The aggregated air quality index (AAQI) was computed, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) air quality index (AQI) was created for each pollutant. According to the data, the AQI for CO, PM 2.5 , and PM 10 in the research region ranged from hazardous to unhealthy; at the same time, the AQI for NO 2 varied between harmful and unhealthy for sensitive groups, with values ranging from 135 to 165. The annual average of the AQI for SO 2 throughout the studied period ranged from 29 to 339, with the categories ranging from good to hazardous. The constant AQI for ozone in the study area indicates that the ozone doses in Qena are surprisingly stable. Lastly, with a minimum value of 265 and a maximum of 489, the AAQI ranged from very unhealthy to dangerous in the current study. According to the data, the area being studied has poor air quality, which impacts the environment and public health. The results of this study have significant implications for environmental sustainability and human health and could be used in other areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Abdel-rahman A. Mustafa & Mohamed S. Shokr & Talal Alharbi & Elsayed A. Abdelsamie & Abdelbaset S. El-Sorogy & Jose Emilio Meroño de Larriva, 2025. "Integration of Google Earth Engine and Aggregated Air Quality Index for Monitoring and Mapping the Spatio-Temporal Air Quality to Improve Environmental Sustainability in Arid Regions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-30, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3450-:d:1633512
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3450/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3450/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Awais Piracha & Muhammad Tariq Chaudhary, 2022. "Urban Air Pollution, Urban Heat Island and Human Health: A Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Int Panis, L. & Beckx, C. & Broekx, S. & De Vlieger, I. & Schrooten, L. & Degraeuwe, B. & Pelkmans, L., 2011. "PM, NOx and CO2 emission reductions from speed management policies in Europe," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(1), pages 32-37, January.
    3. Qing Liu & Dongdong Yang & Lei Cao, 2022. "Evolution and Prediction of the Coupling Coordination Degree of Production–Living–Ecological Space Based on Land Use Dynamics in the Daqing River Basin, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-25, August.
    4. Neha Shaw & A. K. Gorai, 2020. "Study of aerosol optical depth using satellite data (MODIS Aqua) over Indian Territory and its relation to particulate matter concentration," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 265-279, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tao Hong & Ningli Liang & Haomeng Li, 2023. "Study on the Spatial and Temporal Evolution Characteristics and Driving Factors of the “Production–Living–Ecological Space” in Changfeng County," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-15, July.
    2. Filipi Nikol & Karlínová Bára & Krčál Ondřej, 2022. "The disutility of driving below the speed limit on highways," Review of Economic Perspectives, Sciendo, vol. 22(4), pages 267-277, December.
    3. Fang Wang & Yaoyao Peng & Chunyan Jiang, 2017. "Influence of Road Patterns on PM 2.5 Concentrations and the Available Solutions: The Case of Beijing City, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-17, February.
    4. Diao, Liang & Song, Huiqian, 2024. "Does improved tenure security reduce fires? Evidence from the Greece land registry," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    5. Xin Lin & Chris M. J. Tampère & Stef Proost, 2020. "Optimizing Traffic System Performance with Environmental Constraints: Tolls and/or Additional Delays," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 137-177, March.
    6. Dadashpoor, Hashem & Sajadi, Afshin, 2024. "Principles of just urban land use planning," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    7. Yajie Shang & Yuanyuan Chen & Yalin Zhai & Lei Wang, 2025. "Spatiotemporal Relationship Between Carbon Metabolism and Ecosystem Service Value in the Rural Production–Living–Ecological Space of Northeast China’s Black Soil Region: A Case Study of Bin County," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-31, January.
    8. Stephen Kome Fondzenyuy & Blair Matthew Turner & Alina Florentina Burlacu & Chris Jurewicz & Davide Shingo Usami & Steffel Ludivin Tezong Feudjio & Luca Persia, 2024. "The Impact of Speed Limit Change on Emissions: A Systematic Review of Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, September.
    9. Luca Adami & Marco Schiavon, 2022. "A Quali-Quantitative Comparison between In Situ and Ex Situ Waste-to-Energy Processes in Terms of Local and Global Impacts," Resources, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, October.
    10. Nian Wang & Yingming Zhu, 2022. "The Integration of Traditional Transportation Infrastructure and Informatization Development: How Does It Affect Carbon Emissions?," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-23, October.
    11. Kaimeng Li & Shuang Gao & Yuantao Liao & Ke Luo & Shaojian Wang, 2022. "The Impact of Development Zones on China’s Urbanization from the Perspectives of the Population, Land, and the Economy," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-16, October.
    12. Mogno, Caterina & Fontaras, Georgios & Arcidiacono, Vincenzo & Komnos, Dimitrios & Pavlovic, Jelica & Ciuffo, Biagio & Makridis, Michail & Valverde, Victor, 2022. "The application of the CO2MPAS model for vehicle CO2 emissions estimation over real traffic conditions," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 152-159.
    13. Nitzsche, Eric & Tscharaktschiew, Stefan, 2013. "Efficiency of speed limits in cities: A spatial computable general equilibrium assessment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 23-48.
    14. Fiamma Perez-Prada & Andres Monzon & Cristina Valdes, 2017. "Managing Traffic Flows for Cleaner Cities: The Role of Green Navigation Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-18, June.
    15. Guangshun Zhang & Yi Su & Ziming Wang & Ying Chen & Jiangjun Wan & Haichao Bai, 2024. "Spatial–Temporal Evolution and Driving Force Analysis of Blue–Green Space in the Chengdu–Chongqing Economic Circle, China," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-22, October.
    16. Jiayi Tang & Aonghus McNabola & Bruce Misstear & Francesco Pilla & Md Saniul Alam, 2019. "Assessing the Impact of Vehicle Speed Limits and Fleet Composition on Air Quality Near a School," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-23, January.
    17. Victoria Miles & Igor Esau & Lasse Pettersson, 2024. "Using web GIS to promote stakeholder understanding of scientific results in sustainable urban development: A case study in Bergen, Norway," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 2517-2529, June.
    18. Wei Pan & Xiaolu Chen & Xiaojun Duan, 2022. "Energy dissipation and particulate emission at traffic bottleneck based on NaSch model," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 95(7), pages 1-13, July.
    19. Marco Guerrieri & Ferdinando Corriere & Gianfranco Rizzo & Barbara Lo Casto & Gianluca Scaccianoce, 2015. "Improving the Sustainability of Transportation: Environmental and Functional Benefits of Right Turn By-Pass Lanes at Roundabouts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(5), pages 1-19, May.
    20. Paolo Semenzato & Lucia Bortolini, 2023. "Urban Heat Island Mitigation and Urban Green Spaces: Testing a Model in the City of Padova (Italy)," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3450-:d:1633512. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.