IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i8p3371-d1631608.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Characteristics of Ecosystem Services in Megacities Within the Yellow River Basin, Analyzed Through a Resilience Perspective: A Case Study of Xi’an and Jinan

Author

Listed:
  • Bowen Zhang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Xianglong Tang

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

  • Jiexin Cui

    (School of Architecture, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, Xi’an 710000, China)

  • Leshan Cai

    (School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou 730070, China)

Abstract

Megacities in developing countries are still undergoing rapid urbanization, with different cities exhibiting ecosystem services (ESs) heterogeneity. Evaluating ESs among various cities and analyzing the influencing factors from a resilience perspective can effectively enhance the ability of cities to deal with and react quickly to the risks of uncertainty. This approach is also crucial for optimizing ecological security patterns. This study focuses on Xi’an and Jinan, two important megacities along the Yellow River in China. First, we quantified four ecosystem services for both cities: carbon storage (CS), habitat quality (HQ), food production (FP), and soil conservation (SC). Second, we analyzed the synergies and trade-offs between these ESs using bivariate local spatial autocorrelation and Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Finally, we conducted a driver analysis using the Geographic Detector. Results: (1) The spatial and temporal distribution of the four ESs in Xi’an and Jinan is quite different, but both cities show lower ES levels in the urban core area. (2) ESs in Xi’an showed a strong synergistic effect. Among them, CS-HQ had the strongest synergy of 0.93. In terms of space, the north is dominated by low–low clustering, while the south is dominated by high–high clustering. The FP-SC in Jinan showed a trade-off effect of −0.35 in 2000, which gradually weakened over time and was mainly distributed in the northern area of the city where cropland and construction were concentrated. (3) Edge density, patch density, and NDVI have the greatest influence on CS in Xi’an and Jinan. DEM, slope, and patch density have the greatest influence on Xi’an HQ. Temperature, edge density, and patch density have the greatest impact on Jinan HQ. NDVI and temperature have the greatest influence on FP in the two cities. DEM, slope, and edge density have the greatest influence on SC. Landscape fragmentation has a great impact on CS, HQ, and SC in Xi’an and Jinan. Due to insufficient research data, this study focused on only four ESs in Xi’an and Jinan, the megacities in the middle and lower reaches of the Yellow River. However, the research results can provide a new perspective for solving the problem of regional sustainable development and new directions and ideas for follow-up research in this field.

Suggested Citation

  • Bowen Zhang & Xianglong Tang & Jiexin Cui & Leshan Cai, 2025. "Characteristics of Ecosystem Services in Megacities Within the Yellow River Basin, Analyzed Through a Resilience Perspective: A Case Study of Xi’an and Jinan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-23, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3371-:d:1631608
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3371/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/8/3371/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Yuchun Wang & Yufeng Ang & Yingying Zhang & Yunfeng Ruan & Bingyi Wang, 2025. "Identification of Ecological Functional Areas and Scenario Simulation Analysis of the Wanjiang Urban Belt from a Trade-Off/Synergy Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-28, February.
    2. Zhijun Luo & Xiaofang Yang, 2024. "Interrelationships between Urbanization and Ecosystem Services in the Urban Agglomeration around Poyang Lake and Its Zoning Management at an Integrated Multi-Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-23, June.
    3. Guo, Shan & Jiang, Li & Shen, Geoffrey Q.P., 2019. "Embodied pasture land use change in China 2000-2015: From the perspective of globalization," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 476-485.
    4. Wei-Ling Hsu & Zhicheng Zhuang & Cheng Li & Jie Zhao, 2025. "Optimization of Land Use Patterns in a Typical Coal Resource-Based City Based on the Ecosystem Service Relationships of ‘Food–Carbon–Recreation’," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-19, March.
    5. Wei Wen & Kangan Jiang & Xiaojing Shao, 2025. "The Impact of Big Data Pilot Zones on Urban Ecological Resilience: Evidence from a Machine Learning Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-22, March.
    6. Finisdore, John & Rhodes, Charles & Haines-Young, Roy & Maynard, Simone & Wielgus, Jeffrey & Dvarskas, Anthony & Houdet, Joel & Quétier, Fabien & Lamothe, Karl A. & Ding, Helen & Soulard, François & V, 2020. "The 18 benefits of using ecosystem services classification systems," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    7. Bin Yang & Dongqian Xue & Peipei Miao, 2024. "Spatiotemporal Evolution and Driving Factors of Ecosystem Supply and Demand Bundles: A Case Study in the Sichuan-Yunnan Ecological Buffer Area, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-17, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guan, Shihui & Han, Mengyao & Wu, Xiaofang & Guan, ChengHe & Zhang, Bo, 2019. "Exploring energy-water-land nexus in national supply chains: China 2012," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 1225-1234.
    2. Guo, Shan & Li, Yilin & Hu, Yunhao & Xue, Fan & Chen, Bin & Chen, Zhan-Ming, 2020. "Embodied energy in service industry in global cities: A study of six Asian cities," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Anna Jiang & Wanshun Zhang & Feng Zhou & Hong Peng & Xin Liu & Yue Wang & Xiao Zhang, 2023. "Quantitative Assessment of Spatial–Temporal Characteristics of Agricultural Development Level in China: A County-Level Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    4. Franco-Solís, Alberto & Montanía, Claudia V., 2021. "Dynamics of deforestation worldwide: A structural decomposition analysis of agricultural land use in South America," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    5. Cheng, Mengyao & Wu, Jialu & Li, Chaohui & Jia, Yuanxin & Xia, Xiaohua, 2023. "Tele-connection of global agricultural land network: Incorporating complex network approach with multi-regional input-output analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    6. Chuai, Xiaowei & Gao, Runyi & Huang, Xianjin & Lu, Qinli & Zhao, Rongqin, 2021. "The embodied flow of built-up land in China's interregional trade and its implications for regional carbon balance," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    7. Rachel E. Bitoun & Ewan Trégarot & Rodolphe Devillers, 2022. "Bridging theory and practice in ecosystem services mapping: a systematic review," Environment Systems and Decisions, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 103-116, March.
    8. Bayarmaa Byambaa & Walter T. de Vries, 2021. "The Production of Pastoral Space: Modeling Spatial Occupation of Grazing Land for Environmental Impact Assessment Using Structural Equation Modeling," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-18, February.
    9. Kan, Siyi & Chen, Bin & Han, Mengyao & Hayat, Tasawar & Alsulami, Hamed & Chen, Guoqian, 2021. "China’s forest land use change in the globalized world economy: Foreign trade and unequal household consumption," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    10. Bagstad, Kenneth J. & Ingram, Jane Carter & Shapiro, Carl D. & La Notte, Alessandra & Maes, Joachim & Vallecillo, Sara & Casey, C. Frank & Glynn, Pierre D. & Heris, Mehdi P. & Johnson, Justin A. & Lau, 2021. "Lessons learned from development of natural capital accounts in the United States and European Union," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    11. Chen, Weiming & Zhang, Zhenjun & Chen, Kaiyuan, 2023. "Inter-regional economic-environmental correlation effects of power sector in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    12. Pan, Quan & Wen, Zhi & Wu, Tong & Zheng, Tianchen & Yang, Yanzheng & Li, Ruonan & Zheng, Hua, 2022. "Trade-offs and synergies of forest ecosystem services from the perspective of plant functional traits: A systematic review," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 58(C).
    13. Broome, James David & Cook, David & Davíðsdóttir, Brynhildur, 2024. "Heavenly lights: An exploratory review of auroral ecosystem services and disservices," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    14. Kan, Siyi & Chen, Bin & Meng, Jing & Chen, Guoqian, 2020. "An extended overview of natural gas use embodied in world economy and supply chains: Policy implications from a time series analysis," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    15. Kan, Siyi & Chen, Bin & Chen, Guoqian, 2023. "Globalization of forest land use: Increasing threats on climate-vulnerable regions," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    16. Chao Bao & Mutian Xu & Siao Sun, 2019. "China’s Land Uses in the Multi-Region Input–Output Framework," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Fengtai Zhang & Aiyu Xie & Caixia Jiang & Jing Chen & Youzhi An & Peiran Yang & Dalai Ma, 2024. "Coupling coordination analysis and spatiotemporal heterogeneity between urban land green use efficiency and ecosystem services in Yangtze River Economic Belt, China," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-16, December.
    18. Matthew C. Harwell & Chloe A. Jackson, 2021. "Synthesis of Two Decades of US EPA’s Ecosystem Services Research to Inform Environmental, Community and Sustainability Decision Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-29, July.
    19. Xiaomei Fan & Hongguang Liu & Mengmeng Wang, 2022. "Study on the Agricultural Land Transfer Embodied in Inter-Provincial Trade in China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-15, April.
    20. Pengfei Wang & Hongbo Li & Zhenbin Huang, 2024. "Quantifying Inter‐regional Trade Inequality of China's Cities Based on Environmental‐economic Benefits in Virtual Built‐up Land Flow," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 32(5), pages 226-246, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:8:p:3371-:d:1631608. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.