IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2533-d1611768.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Surface Subsidence Response to Safety Pillar Width Between Reactor Cavities in the Underground Gasification of Thin Coal Seams

Author

Listed:
  • Ivan Sakhno

    (Department of Mining, Mining and Metallurgy Faculty, Technical University “Metinvest Polytechnic” LLC., Pivdenne Shose 80, 69008 Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine)

  • Svitlana Sakhno

    (Department of Mining, Mining and Metallurgy Faculty, Technical University “Metinvest Polytechnic” LLC., Pivdenne Shose 80, 69008 Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine)

  • Oleksandr Vovna

    (Department of Mining, Mining and Metallurgy Faculty, Technical University “Metinvest Polytechnic” LLC., Pivdenne Shose 80, 69008 Zaporizhzhia, Ukraine
    Department of Software Systems and Technologies, Faculty of Information Technology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Volodymyrska Str., 60, 01033 Kyiv, Ukraine)

Abstract

Underground coal gasification (UCG) is a clean and automated coal technological process that has great potential. Environmental hazards such as the risk of ground surface subsidence, flooding, and water pollution are among the problems that restrict the application of UCG. Overburden rock stability above UCG cavities plays a key role in the prevention of the mentioned environmental hazards. It is necessary to optimize the safety pillar width to maintain rock stability and ensure minimal coal losses. This study focused on the investigation of the influence of pillar parameters on surface subsidence, taking into account the non-rectangular shape of the pillar and the presence of voids above the UCG reactor in the immediate roof. The main research was carried out using the finite element method in ANSYS 17.2 software. The results of the first simulation stage demonstrated that during underground gasification of a thin coal seam using the Controlled Retraction Injection Points method, with reactor cavities measuring 30 m in length and pillars ranging from 3.75 to 15 m in width, the surface subsidence and rock movement above gasification cavities remain within the pre-peak limits, provided the safety pillar’s bearing capacity is maintained. The probability of crack initiation in the rock mass and subsequent environmental hazards is low. However, in the case of the safety pillars’ destruction, there is a high risk of crack evolution in the overburden rock. In the case of crack formation above the gasification panel, the destruction of aquiferous sandstones and water breakthroughs into the gasification cavities become possible. The surface infrastructure is therefore at risk of destruction. The assessment of the pillars’ stability was carried out at the second stage using numerical simulation. The study of the stress–strain state and temperature distribution in the surrounding rocks near a UCG reactor shows that the size of the heat-affected zone of the UCG reactor is less than the thickness of the coal seam. This shows that there is no significant direct influence of the gasification process on the stability of the surrounding rocks around previously excavated cavities. The coal seam failure in the side walls of the UCG reactor, which occurs during gasification, leads to a reduction in the useful width of the safety pillar. The algorithm applied in this study enables the optimization of pillar width under any mining and geological conditions. This makes it possible to increase the safety and reliability of the UCG process. For the conditions of this research, the failure of coal at the stage of gasification led to a decrease in the useful width of the safety pillar by 0.5 m. The optimal width of the pillar was 15 m.

Suggested Citation

  • Ivan Sakhno & Svitlana Sakhno & Oleksandr Vovna, 2025. "Surface Subsidence Response to Safety Pillar Width Between Reactor Cavities in the Underground Gasification of Thin Coal Seams," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2533-:d:1611768
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2533/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2533/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2015. "Thermo-Mechanical Simulations of Rock Behavior in Underground Coal Gasification Show Negligible Impact of Temperature-Dependent Parameters on Permeability Changes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 8(6), pages 1-28, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Christopher Otto & Thomas Kempka, 2017. "Prediction of Steam Jacket Dynamics and Water Balances in Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, May.
    2. Karol Kostúr & Marek Laciak & Milan Durdan, 2018. "Some Influences of Underground Coal Gasification on the Environment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-31, May.
    3. Krzysztof Skrzypkowski & Krzysztof Zagórski & Anna Zagórska, 2021. "Determination of the Extent of the Rock Destruction Zones around a Gasification Channel on the Basis of Strength Tests of Sandstone and Claystone Samples Heated at High Temperatures up to 1200 °C and ," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    4. Natalie Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2019. "Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(17), pages 1-28, August.
    5. Zhen Dong & Haiyang Yi & Yufeng Zhao & Xinggang Wang & Tingxiang Chu & Junjie Xue & Hanqi Wu & Shanshan Chen & Mengyuan Zhang & Hao Chen, 2022. "Investigation of the Evolution of Stratum Fracture during the Cavity Expansion of Underground Coal Gasification," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    6. Fa-qiang Su & Akihiro Hamanaka & Ken-ichi Itakura & Gota Deguchi & Wenyan Zhang & Hua Nan, 2018. "Evaluation of a Compact Coaxial Underground Coal Gasification System Inside an Artificial Coal Seam," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-11, April.
    7. Sheng-Qi Yang & Jin-Zhou Tang & Derek Elsworth, 2021. "Creep Rupture and Permeability Evolution in High Temperature Heat-Treated Sandstone Containing Pre-Existing Twin Flaws," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-19, October.
    8. Sheng-Qi Yang & Bo Hu & Pathegama G. Ranjith & Peng Xu, 2018. "Multi-Step Loading Creep Behavior of Red Sandstone after Thermal Treatments and a Creep Damage Model," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Natalie Christine Nakaten & Thomas Kempka, 2017. "RETRACTED: Techno-Economic Comparison of Onshore and Offshore Underground Coal Gasification End-Product Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2533-:d:1611768. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.