IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i6p2484-d1610422.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recycling Post-Consumed Polylactic Acid Waste Through Three-Dimensional Printing: Technical vs. Resource Efficiency Benefits

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Raquibul Hasan

    (Sustainable Engineering Group, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Ian J. Davies

    (School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Alokesh Pramanik

    (School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Michele John

    (Sustainable Engineering Group, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

  • Wahidul K. Biswas

    (Sustainable Engineering Group, School of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia)

Abstract

The linear “take–make–dispose” model of plastic consumption has led to significant environmental challenges and unplanned waste legacies, emphasising the need for more sustainable recycling practices. This study explored the integration of post-consumer recycled polylactic acid (rPLA) into 3D printing filaments as a step towards sustainable manufacturing. Using 100% virgin PLA (vPLA) as the baseline, filaments were produced with rPLA-to-vPLA ratios of 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% and evaluated for surface roughness, tensile strength, flexural properties, and hardness. The results revealed that increasing the rPLA content negatively affects the mechanical properties and surface quality. Surface roughness increased from 7.06 µm for pure vPLA to 10.50 µm for 100% rPLA, whilst the tensile and flexural strengths of 100% rPLA decreased by 48.4% and 49%, respectively, compared to vPLA. Hardness also declined, with 100% rPLA showing a 7.5% reduction relative to vPLA. Despite these reductions, the blends with up to 50% rPLA retained over 90% of the mechanical performance of pure vPLA, demonstrating a viable compromise between performance and sustainability. Morphological analysis highlighted poor interlayer adhesion and void formation as the primary causes of performance degradation in higher rPLA blends. Despite these challenges, this study demonstrated that rPLA-vPLA blends can extend the life cycle of PLA and promote sustainable manufacturing practices. By addressing polymer degradation challenges, this research supports the integration of recycled materials in 3D printing, contributing to the circular economy goals of recycling, resource efficiency, and sustainable manufacturing production outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Raquibul Hasan & Ian J. Davies & Alokesh Pramanik & Michele John & Wahidul K. Biswas, 2025. "Recycling Post-Consumed Polylactic Acid Waste Through Three-Dimensional Printing: Technical vs. Resource Efficiency Benefits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-26, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2484-:d:1610422
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2484/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/6/2484/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Geena Prasad & H. Arunav & S. Dwight & Madhav B. Ghosh & Ayona Jayadev & Deepa Indira Nair, 2024. "Advancing Sustainable Practices in Additive Manufacturing: A Comprehensive Review on Material Waste Recyclability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Daniel Maga & Markus Hiebel & Venkat Aryan, 2019. "A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Meat Trays Made of Various Packaging Materials," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-18, September.
    3. Antreas Kantaros & Evangelos Soulis & Elli Alysandratou, 2023. "Digitization of Ancient Artefacts and Fabrication of Sustainable 3D-Printed Replicas for Intended Use by Visitors with Disabilities: The Case of Piraeus Archaeological Museum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-18, August.
    4. Hamza Cheniti & Kaouther Kerboua & Omar Sekiou & Hani Amir Aouissi & Aissa Benselhoub & Rachida Mansouri & Ibtissem Zeriri & Karima Barbari & Jadranka Blazevska Gilev & Zihad Bouslama, 2024. "Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management within Open Dumping and Landfilling Contexts: A Strategic Analysis and Planning Responses Applicable to Algeria," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-21, August.
    5. Hyeong-Jin Choi & Donggun Hwang & Young-Sam Yoon & Tae-Wan Jeon & Seung-Whee Rhee, 2024. "Applying Material Flow Analysis for Sustainable Waste Management of Single-Use Plastics and Packaging Materials in the Republic of Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Hottle, Troy A. & Bilec, Melissa M. & Landis, Amy E., 2017. "Biopolymer production and end of life comparisons using life cycle assessment," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 295-306.
    7. Despeisse, M. & Baumers, M. & Brown, P. & Charnley, F. & Ford, S.J. & Garmulewicz, A. & Knowles, S. & Minshall, T.H.W. & Mortara, L. & Reed-Tsochas, F.P. & Rowley, J., 2017. "Unlocking value for a circular economy through 3D printing: A research agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 75-84.
    8. Damien Giurco & Anna Littleboy & Thomas Boyle & Julian Fyfe & Stuart White, 2014. "Circular Economy: Questions for Responsible Minerals, Additive Manufacturing and Recycling of Metals," Resources, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Fonseca & Edgar Ramalho & Ana Gouveia & Filipa Figueiredo & João Nunes, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of PLA Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Aslam, Javed & Saleem, Aqeela & Lai, Kee-hung & Kim, Yun Bae, 2025. "Critical successes factors for the adoption of additive manufacturing: Integrated impact for circular economy model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    3. Deniz Turkcu & Nina Tura & Ville Ojanen, 2022. "A Conceptual Framework of the Sustainability Challenges Experienced during the Life Cycle of Biobased Packaging Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-17, August.
    4. Sebastian Spierling & Venkateshwaran Venkatachalam & Marina Mudersbach & Nico Becker & Christoph Herrmann & Hans-Josef Endres, 2020. "End-of-Life Options for Bio-Based Plastics in a Circular Economy—Status Quo and Potential from a Life Cycle Assessment Perspective," Resources, MDPI, vol. 9(7), pages 1-20, July.
    5. Tan, Quanyin & Yang, Liyao & Wei, Fan & Chen, Yuan & Li, Jinhui, 2023. "Comparative life cycle assessment of polyethylene agricultural mulching film and alternative options including different end-of-life routes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Gianmarco Bressanelli & Federico Adrodegari & Daniela C. A. Pigosso & Vinit Parida, 2022. "Towards the Smart Circular Economy Paradigm: A Definition, Conceptualization, and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    7. Kajikawa, Yuya & Mejia, Cristian & Wu, Mengjia & Zhang, Yi, 2022. "Academic landscape of Technological Forecasting and Social Change through citation network and topic analyses," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Markéta Šerešová & Vladimír Kočí, 2020. "Proposal of Package-to-Product Indicator for Carbon Footprint Assessment with Focus on the Czech Republic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    9. Jaya Priyadarshini & Rajesh Kr Singh & Ruchi Mishra & Surajit Bag, 2022. "Investigating the interaction of factors for implementing additive manufacturing to build an antifragile supply chain: TISM-MICMAC approach," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(1), pages 567-588, June.
    10. Mónica Duque-Acevedo & Luis Jesús Belmonte-Ureña & Natalia Yakovleva & Francisco Camacho-Ferre, 2020. "Analysis of the Circular Economic Production Models and Their Approach in Agriculture and Agricultural Waste Biomass Management," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-32, December.
    11. T. E. Graedel & Barbara K. Reck & Luca Ciacci & Fabrizio Passarini, 2019. "On the Spatial Dimension of the Circular Economy," Resources, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, February.
    12. Beltagui, Ahmad & Sesis, Achilleas & Stylos, Nikolaos, 2021. "A bricolage perspective on democratising innovation: The case of 3D printing in makerspaces," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    13. Jim Hart & Francesco Pomponi, 2021. "A Circular Economy: Where Will It Take Us?," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(1), pages 127-141, June.
    14. Francesco Mercuri & Gaetano della Corte & Federica Ricci, 2021. "Blockchain Technology and Sustainable Business Models: A Case Study of Devoleum," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-14, May.
    15. Naghshineh, Bardia & Ribeiro, André & Jacinto, Celeste & Carvalho, Helena, 2021. "Social impacts of additive manufacturing: A stakeholder-driven framework," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    16. Yang Zhang & Changqi Dong, 2024. "Sustainable Development of Digital Cultural Heritage: A Hybrid Analysis of Crowdsourcing Projects Using fsQCA and System Dynamics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-27, September.
    17. Henner Gimpel & Valerie Graf-Drasch & Alexander Kammerer & Maximilian Keller & Xinyi Zheng, 2020. "When does it pay off to integrate sustainability in the business model? – A game-theoretic analysis," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(4), pages 699-716, December.
    18. Yadav, Dinesh & Garg, Ramesh Kumar & Ahlawat, Akash & Chhabra, Deepak, 2020. "3D printable biomaterials for orthopedic implants: Solution for sustainable and circular economy," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C).
    19. Anna Marciniuk-Kluska & Mariusz Kluska, 2025. "An Attempt to Assess the Implementation of the Circular Economy in the EU-27 as an Important Element of Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, May.
    20. Huynh Evertsen, Phuc & Rasmussen, Einar & Nenadic, Oleg, 2022. "Commercializing circular economy innovations: A taxonomy of academic spin-offs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:6:p:2484-:d:1610422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.