IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v17y2025i2p792-d1571208.html

The Impact of Sustainability Certification Schemes and Labels on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Systematic Evidence Map

Author

Listed:
  • William J. Harvey

    (Oxford Systematic Reviews LLP, Oxford OX2 7DL, UK
    School of Archaeology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2PG, UK)

  • Naomi Black

    (ISEAL Alliance, London E2 9DA, UK)

  • Salma Essaouabi

    (ISEAL Alliance, London E2 9DA, UK
    Kings College London, London WC2R 2LS, UK)

  • Leo Petrokofsky

    (Oxford Systematic Reviews LLP, Oxford OX2 7DL, UK)

  • Vidya Rangan

    (ISEAL Alliance, London E2 9DA, UK)

  • Matt Stancliffe Bird

    (ISEAL Alliance, London E2 9DA, UK)

  • Daniel Villar

    (Hertford College, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3BW, UK)

  • Marxine Waite

    (Environmental Coalition on Standards (ECOS), Nairobi P.O. Box 283-00502, Kenya)

  • Gillian Petrokofsky

    (Oxford Systematic Reviews LLP, Oxford OX2 7DL, UK
    Department of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SZ, UK)

Abstract

This systematic map explores the role of sustainability certification schemes and labels in reducing greenhouse gas emissions across biobased value chains. With increasing global and EU interest in transitioning to a sustainable bioeconomy, these certification mechanisms are seen as critical tools for promoting low-emission practices. This review maps the available evidence regarding the effectiveness of certification schemes, examining sector-specific variations and identifying knowledge gaps. A comprehensive search strategy was employed across three major databases and grey literature sources, yielding 41 relevant articles. There are significant disparities in the evidence on the impact of sustainability certification schemes and labels on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions across biobased sectors. Agriculture has the most data, but studies are heavily focused on organic systems, limiting broader conclusions. Most research is concentrated in Southeast Asia and Europe, reducing generalizability to other regions. Additionally, most studies focus on the production stage, leaving value chain phases like processing and disposal under-represented. Knowledge gaps exist across sectors, certification schemes, and life cycle stages, highlighting the need for further research. While some schemes incorporate GHG management tools, evidence on their effectiveness remains insufficient and context-dependent, warranting more robust, targeted research. Though this research looked at all biobased feedstocks, it did not review schemes and labels specifically targeting biofuels, which presents an avenue for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • William J. Harvey & Naomi Black & Salma Essaouabi & Leo Petrokofsky & Vidya Rangan & Matt Stancliffe Bird & Daniel Villar & Marxine Waite & Gillian Petrokofsky, 2025. "The Impact of Sustainability Certification Schemes and Labels on Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Systematic Evidence Map," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-25, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:792-:d:1571208
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/792/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/17/2/792/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Julius McGee, 2015. "Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 32(2), pages 255-263, June.
    2. Christian Bux & Mariarosaria Lombardi & Erica Varese & Vera Amicarelli, 2022. "Economic and Environmental Assessment of Conventional versus Organic Durum Wheat Production in Southern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    3. Baydar, G. & Ciliz, N. & Mammadov, A., 2015. "Life cycle assessment of cotton textile products in Turkey," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 213-223.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zuzana Fuksová & Iveta Bošková & Jana Hlaváčková & Marek Novák, 2025. "The economic aspects of organic farms selling their products to organic or conventional market," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 71(4), pages 218-227.
    2. Agnė Jučienė & Inga Gurauskienė & Jolita Kruopienė, 2025. "Calculating the Environmental Impact Reduction Due to Extended Lifespan of Clothing Through Clothing Swaps," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Wen-Kuo Chen & Ching-Torng Lin, 2021. "Interrelationship among CE Adoption Obstacles of Supply Chain in the Textile Sector: Based on the DEMATEL-ISM Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-24, June.
    4. Shuang Chen & Fangli Chen & Lisha Zhu & Qizheng Li & Xiaopeng Wang & Laili Wang, 2023. "A Spatial Water Footprint Assessment of Recycled Cotton T-Shirts: Case of Local Impacts in Selected China Provinces," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    5. Rachel Soper, 2020. "How wage structure and crop size negatively impact farmworker livelihoods in monocrop organic production: interviews with strawberry harvesters in California," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 37(2), pages 325-336, June.
    6. Zouhair Rached & Ali Chebil & Chokri Thabet, 2022. "Effect of Farm Size on Sustainability Dimensions: Case of Durum Wheat in Northern Tunisia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    7. Roy, Vivek & Silvestre, Bruno S. & Singh, Shubham, 2020. "Reactive and proactive pathways to sustainable apparel supply chains: Manufacturer's perspective on stakeholder salience and organizational learning toward responsible management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Esteve-Turrillas, F.A. & de la Guardia, M., 2017. "Environmental impact of Recover cotton in textile industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 107-115.
    9. Rahul B. Hiremath & Yogesh Mahajan & Santanu Bhadra & Ravi Sharma & Ardhendu Shekhar Singh, 2025. "Fostering a Sustainability Transition Toward the Organic Farming Paradigm: A Policy Innovation Perspective," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 69(3), pages 649-661, July.
    10. Yekimov Sergiy, 2023. "Study of the problem of reducing greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural production Czech Republic," Papers 2305.13253, arXiv.org.
    11. Kosar Mousavi & Elaheh Kowsari & Seeram Ramakrishna & Amutha Chinnappan & Mohammad Gheibi, 2025. "A comprehensive review of greenwashing in the textile industry (life cycle assessment, life cycle cost, and eco-labeling)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(9), pages 21737-21777, September.
    12. Alice Bernini & Rike Becker & Odunayo David Adeniyi & Giorgio Pilla & Seyed Hamidreza Sadeghi & Michael Maerker, 2023. "Hydrological Implications of Recent Droughts (2004–2022): A SWAT-Based Study in an Ancient Lowland Irrigation Area in Lombardy, Northern Italy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-24, December.
    13. Julius Alexander McGee, 2016. "Does certified organic farming reduce greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural production? Reply to Muller et al," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 33(4), pages 949-952, December.
    14. Tian Xia & Romain Benkirane & Anne Perwuelz, 2025. "Optimizing Laundry for Sustainability: Balancing Washing Efficiency and Environmental Impact in the Clothing Use Phase," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-20, September.
    15. Maria Giordano & Spyridon A. Petropoulos & Youssef Rouphael, 2021. "The Fate of Nitrogen from Soil to Plants: Influence of Agricultural Practices in Modern Agriculture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    16. Techane Bosona, 2024. "Environmental Impact Assessment of Organic Wheat Cracker Value Chains with and without Nettle Powder as a Natural Additive: A Case of Sweden," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-12, April.
    17. Huang, Qiliang & Gong, Yingting & Dewi, Ratih Kemala & Li, Peiran & Wang, Xiaolong & Hashimi, Rahmatullah & Komatsuzaki, Masakazu, 2025. "Evaluating the sustainability of tillage and cover crop management practices in regenerative organic agriculture using life cycle assessment-based emergy analysis," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 229(C).
    18. Ning Sun & Sai Tang & Ju Zhang & Jiaxin Wu & Hongwei Wang, 2022. "Food Security: 3D Dynamic Display and Early Warning Platform Construction and Security Strategy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-16, September.
    19. Christodoulos Savva & Christos Koidis & Charisios Achillas & Christos Mertzanakis & Dimitrios-Aristotelis Koumpakis & Alexandra V. Michailidou & Christos Vlachokostas, 2025. "User-Friendly, Real-Time LCA Tool for Dynamic Sustainability Assessment and Support of EPD Schemes Towards Circular Bioenergy Pathways," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-23, September.
    20. Chen, Jiandong & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin, 2018. "Changes in energy-related carbon dioxide emissions of the agricultural sector in China from 2005 to 2013," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 748-761.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:17:y:2025:i:2:p:792-:d:1571208. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.